Sentences with phrase «science talking about»

All that fancy atheist - humanist - science talk about how «logical» the «proper» morality is, is a bunch of bunk.

And all that fancy atheist - humanist - science talk about how «logical» the «proper» morality is, is a bunch of bunk.

Not exact matches

Gates writes on his blog about meeting with Camille Jones, Washington state's 2017 teacher of the year, to talk about Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math education.

«You've got statistics, accounting, management science, operational research, but you're not talking about humans,» says Burke.

As a passionate advocate for accessible computer science, she spoke at this year's March for Science in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about Eyeascience, she spoke at this year's March for Science in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about EyeaScience in Washington, DC and has presented a TEDx talk, which you can watch below to learn more about Eyeagnosis.

Dr. Zuckerberg talks about his son as having been «a good student» and having «a special affinity for math and sciences.»

Most of the successful women I have interviewed talked about the important role that their parents had played in encouraging them to pursue science and engineering and succeed in a male - dominated industry.

«This is a chance for the Democrats to talk in tough terms about safety and security and also to link that to the gun issue,» said Robert Spitzer, political science professor at State University of New York at Cortland.

The experts at Albany's College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering talk about the burgeoning field of nanotechnology.

They are talking about everyone who chooses to be self - employed — from a corner food vendor without a high school diploma to a high - tech founder with a PhD in Computer Science from Stanford.)

«I am one of the only students with a science background who also has significant startup experience, so I think that brings a very different view to our case discussions when we talk about making decisions using very little data,» she said.

Before we talk about how to get started, though, I wanted to let you know I researched and compiled science - backed ways to stick to good habits and stop procrastinating.

[1:20] How the kindness of a stranger changed Tony's life [3:35] Peter Diamandis talks about the origins of X Prize [6:30] Technology helping the agricultural industry [7:00] Sequencing genomes [8:55] Life - work integration [11:15] Finding your highest calling in life [12:00] Reframing what is «impossible» [14:00] Strategy vs. psychology [15:00] Changing your state [16:00] The science of achievement, the art of fulfillment [19:00] Living in a beautiful state [24:00] Thinking 10x bigger [28:00] Surrounding yourself with a «nothing is impossible» community [29:00] The news pollutes your mind [31:00] Tony's natural gifts and core beliefs [33:30] Overcoming failure and criticism [37:45] Defining your environment [40:00] Life happens for you, not to you [42:00] Rituals and practices to up your game [46:30] Tony's priming process

Cambridge Analytica, a data science company that worked for President Trump's campaign, announced Tuesday that it has suspended chief executive Alexander Nix after a British television station aired secretly recorded video that appeared to show him talking about entrapment as a way to win campaigns.

Rona and I talk about the science of gratitude, and why consciously practicing gratitude can boost our happiness so much.

Today we're talking with Durango, CO native Scott Stoltzman about data science, Fort Collins» best coworking space, his pastimes and his favorite places in Fort Collins.

This Friday I will be joining colleagues in international affairs, journalism, public policy and political science to talk about «Academics in the Media Landscape: The Role of Scholar - Columnist - Bloggers».

I don't know why more people don't talk about Google Scholar, but I love this tool for researching science - heavy articles and digging into emerging studies.

In this podcast Simon King talks to Peter about his journey to working in Venture Capital from a background in physical sciences and academia, via Africa.

We are talking about the system, and you are already starting to argue about something science can never prove or disprove.

The fact is there are already plenty of churches in America, arguably the majority of them in this country, that emphasize social justice, acceptance of LGBT, and «letting science to its thing» — I'm talking about the mainline liberal churches.

if we talk about science i can provide you with some evidence but religion is the opposite... you just believe.

There are more stories out of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.

I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the religious community.

I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide examples of lay persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

= > this is a negative confirmation as science can only observe the natural thus even with all the talk about someday we will know the evidence confirms the observation that day never has come.

Dalahast; you said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide examples of lay persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.»

We are all free to talk about science.

A christian shouldn't feel their religion is under attack if they can't wear something on their chest or if they work at a place devoted to science and can't talk about ID

Nobel Prize winner talking about Christian's contributions to science.

Of course your professors never talked about faith in your science classes.

Always amusing to see atheists talk about science and world history which is what most people believe ven Christians.

Because science has kind of proven or talked about all those things you were just asking... maybe pick up a book other than a work of fiction and learn something that's real and tangible.

For arguments sake let us talk about science, is every thing in this world explained by science?

Why are you talking about laws of science when the Bible says, in effect, that all of them are optional?

Imagine trying to talk to a person from 5 thousand years in the past about the science we now understand.

«Well when was the last time you talked about why you are inclusive, why you embrace science, why you care for the poor, and why you avoid aligning yourself with one political party?»

Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved» Now religion is USING the discoveries of science to CLAIM IT IS EVIDENCE to support their unevidenced claims... talk about fraud and hypocrisy.

Her credentials prove that she understands the science behind her feelings????? The science behind her feelings?????? What the hell are you talking about?

Yet when religions talk about alternate states of being and planes of existence, they are ridiculed by believers in «science.»

Science being laws acting on initial conditions, it can not explain the origin of the universe since the universe IS the laws and conditions we are talking about.

Science and God go hand in hand but people that descredit the bible miss out on the scientific facts it talks about.

That's sort of like saying, «you can't understand or talk about science if you haven't read this or that book».

I am not speaking to «attacking all views of God» I was actually talking about your assumed philosophy of science which you think doesn't provide enough evidence for God.

Now if we are talking about a Multi-Verse like science have speculated, it's the phases that each universe is created in and there end.

i wish those that bash evolution did the same research and science then maybe they would know what they are talking about.

We had an amazing sermon by a Chemist at my church last year talking about how science doesn't refute God's creation, nor does Creationism refute science.

This is what Bill is talking about with bad engineering and science.

De Grasse Tyson talks about the almost total absence of Nobel prizes in science awarded to Muslims, as a measure of contributions to modern science.