Sentences with phrase «science works just»

Given all of the information for a specific problem, science works just fine.

Not exact matches

There's science behind it, but it's too new to know if it «really works» or it's just a placebo effect.

The science is incontrovertible: exercise is just as good for your brain as it is for the rest of your body, and just like your heart and your lungs, your brain will work better if you regularly break a sweat.

Walsh's paper, published in Clinical Psychological Science in April, is just the first stage of the work.

Just clarifying your faith structure... matter, which can neither be created nor destroyed but only change forms (according to science), somehow just appeared in some form and worked its way to complex lJust clarifying your faith structure... matter, which can neither be created nor destroyed but only change forms (according to science), somehow just appeared in some form and worked its way to complex ljust appeared in some form and worked its way to complex life.

If they put in only what they could imagine or perceive with just their senses then the Bible doesn't impress as a source of information that trumps modern science, with our advanced instruments, computers and dedicated professionals all investigating how the universe actually works.

The fact that you just posted a comment on the internet is all the proof you need to know that science does, in fact, work.

Because science has kind of proven or talked about all those things you were just asking... maybe pick up a book other than a work of fiction and learn something that's real and tangible.

Just keep your mind open, and continue to evolve your thinking with the sciences that are out there and possibly you will come up with a «model» of a «higher power» that works for you.

Do nt you get it all the advanments in science have led me to my faith, in your case they have led you to yours and you just believe chance is at work...

The problem that most often resulted was that people could understand the small parts just fine, but like western science, lost sight of the whole and couldn't understand how it all was supposed to work together on the grand scale.

It would be like having your science teacher explain in detail what we have discovered in regards to evolution and been able to test and repeat but then ends with «Even though this is what we have observed time and again and has been peer reviewed and see no reason it should work in any other way, we just don't know how science worked 10,000 years ago.

If God was completly removed we would not have such an intellectual book to even believe in... God can speak through man and many predictions that were in the bible came true already... How can men that have no back grounds of science or physics and basic understand of the world and how it works be able to come up with half the stuff in the bible... Really hard to come up with the figures when your just a fisherman or even a king... Only explains God even more

Face it, you have no idea if there are any gods, or if satan inspired your book (a god would not have gotten so much wrong) You act just like those ridiculous crewationist sites caliming science but clearly do not understand how science works... you do not know how logic works.

Because science doesn't represent it's theories as truth, just as models that work.

You can be religious and work in science, just as long as you ignore science while in church and forget religion at work.

... yeah suzy and others... I just happen to realize that when monkey devolving didn't quite work out on paper it all changed to single cells and from the slime off of the worlds garbage can and so on... I just happen to know more than you think... In another ten or twenty years the science books will all have a new teaching... the Bible has been around and hasn't changed one word in over two thousnad years..

In the long run, however, science and medicine will properly be in charge of much of this work, and ministry will have to be conducted through staff cooperation just as in relation to physical and mental illness, alcoholism, and other health problems.

Science doesn't have to be true, it just has to work.

we'll just cook burgers at fast food joints and clean toilets while the «smart» people continue with «the hard work of science».

I'm just amazed at all the atheists here who act like the rest of us who believe have never read a modern book, don't believe in Science, and all work on a dairy farm without electricity.

Flying needs two wings, just as finding the really important truths of existence needs both faith and science — working in harmony.

If Alan Guth's work is empirically verified, a large question will remain — a question that takes Guth's science to just such a boundary: Where did that primordial something, that «patch of material packed with... repulsive gravity» that contained «the ingredients of what would become our entire observable universe,» come from?

We'll just all forget about the people actually in that field working on this constantly and listen to some random anti-science hypocrite on the internet on what is reliable science.

I like the idea of experience not words without knowledge and one more thing these here don't even know science they just speak someone else s work.

Science and religion are not mutually exclusive... all Christians do not believe just what they are told and some actually think «work out their faith», and we all don't just blindly believe in a «sky fairy» blah, blah, blah, God is like believing in the Easter bunny, religion is just here to control you... STUPID... do you know how much wisdom is in the bible?

Brand also asked about the seeming divide between science and religion, to which McGrath replied: «For me, science is great but it doesn't help us find that extra dimension - there's something special about human beings, we don't want to just know how things work but what they mean».

C.H. Waddington believes that scientific thought is «just about now beginning to catch up with the first phase of Whitehead's thought,» and that science will proceed in the general direction Whitehead moved in his later work.

Science just likes to explain how it works, while religion just likes to say «God did this, don't question it.»

Interesting discussion — Totally agree about the «punching above their weight» problem with the current spate of «popular» atheists and junk writers, as well as the «Hollywood» treatment of Pullman, but you don't need to wade through Pullman's trilogy to get a useful insight into institutionalism vs genuine spirituality — just pick up the excellent «The Dragon in the Sea» by Dune author Frank Herbert or «The Moon is a Harsh Mistress» by Robert Heinlien — great works from the Golden Age of Science Fiction literature.

Again, science just explains how it works.

Science and religion are really not at odds with each other anymore, there was a wonderful article in Discovery magazine, 1 to 2 years ago, that spoke of the possibility of how a larger force could be at work within the physical world, and that scientist is just one of many finding evidence of God in what they are learning from physics.

Science just doesn't work that way.

Science is by far the best method man has found to investigate and understand how the world works, but it is still just a method not a thing to be trusted or not.

just because a naturalistic explanation does not exist presently for many of the questions which anyone can ask — that doesn't give license to ignorant, infantile, delusional suboid humans to answer those questions by skipping all the requisite hard work science demands only to jump directly to «god did it».

I can't say that I have delved to much into the science of how best this works — asides from using the worm deposits and a little Seasol, my gardening technique more runs along the lines of «let's just chuck it in the ground and hope for the best!»

«But effective environmental water management is not just about the best available science, it also relies on the insights and experiences of people living and working in the Murray - Darling Basin.

These aren't rocket science, and you can adjust them to a schedule that fits your needs; I'm just including them as an example of worked for me as my baby got older.

I have worked with children nd adults of all ages starting at 5 months of age and have professionally tutored and taught Math, Science, Social Studies, English, Creative Writing, Reading and specialize in working with kids with special needs, learning disabilities, or those who may just need a little extra patience.

Don't ask me the science or magic or logic behind them, I just know that they work.

Potty - training a child in just one day might sound too good to be true, but according to «Parenting Science,» the technique often works if the child is ready for potty - training and if the parent follows the instructions properly.

«We have just sent some of our science teachers to a work shop in Gombe State to keep abreast of the modern laboratory equipment being used in Biology, Physics and Chemistry; this was paid for by the state government.

At Clarkson University, the highly regarded science and engineering school in St. Lawrence County, a professor working on smart energy grid systems was just awarded a grant by IBM.

Having worked on yeast genetics during his academic career, when Mark West decided that he just wasn't happy in research any more, he realised that perhaps he could apply his skills in California's wine industry — an industry that is part art, part science.

She wants to ensure her work «fills the gaps between existing science and stakeholders» needs,» and isn't just «scientists speaking to scientists.»

It just so happened that a nearby lab housed Mildred Dresselhaus, known as the «queen of carbon science» for her work on exotic forms of the stuff.

This starts with engagement — not just disseminating my science, but listening to people from across the spectrum and working together to develop scientific solutions.

Ruth Müller, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Research Policy Institute at Lund University in Sweden, who focused her Ph.D. on studying how the academic landscape influences the working practices of postdocs in the life sciences, notes that while the study acknowledges the diversity of the European system, it uses just one European country — Germany — in its quantitative survey.

Among those already using the program with his students is Gerald Smith, who teaches conceptual physics and advanced chemistry at Bishop McNamara High School in Washington and plans to attend the march.Students who completed the print - out activity sheet illustrated how headphones work through physics — among the examples Smith intends to post to Twitter after spring break, the week after the March for Science «The kids definitely like to probe their brains a lot in terms of seeing science in real life, not just something far - reaching for geniuses to dobut as something that we exist in every day,» saidScience «The kids definitely like to probe their brains a lot in terms of seeing science in real life, not just something far - reaching for geniuses to dobut as something that we exist in every day,» saidscience in real life, not just something far - reaching for geniuses to dobut as something that we exist in every day,» said Smith.

He and Just plan on continuing their work with other sciences our ancestors knew little about, including genetics and computer science.