Sentences with phrase «scientific and other reasons»

Not exact matches

Without pretending to be scientific about it, the world may be imagined to be a vast collection of existences — things and substances of various compositions and kinds — each of which is what it is, and moves, changes, grows, or decays as it does by reason of its relation to other things: things existing in various ways by, and in some cases, at the expense of, or on, other things.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

Above in addition to many other scientific discoveries that have been stated in the Quran that was revealed 1400 years ago are one strong reason any logical person would believe in its authenticity and trust that this book is from God and that God exists!

To others, his analysis of how metaphysical reasoning, qua metaphysical (his doctrine of the separatio), is distinct from yet allied to scientific and mathematical thought still endures.

Heliocentrism, on the other hand, created a world where matter clumped randomly around the universe, which defied all reason, observation and scientific knowledge.

For like Whitehead and Dewey, Kadushin understood that the concept of organic thinking offered an approach to logic and the foundations of knowledge that was an alternative to the perversions of the sort of blind faith in natural science that had come to dominate the intellectual cultures of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; an alternative that did not attempt to devalue science or replace it with a nonrational mysticism, but which did attempt to place scientific thought into a broader cultural context in which other forms of cultural expression such as religious and legal reasoning could play important and non-subservient roles.

There are many reasons why this has happened; this is no place to discuss them, but among others we may mention scientific constructions, psychological discoveries, awareness of sociological conditions, and all that Bonhoeffer summed up in saying that man has «come of age» (by which he did not mean that man is an entirely mature and adult creature who now can take the place of God, in a fashion not unlike the claim made by the Provost of King's in his recent utterances; but he did mean that we now know our own responsibility and that God treats us, not like slaves nor like little children, but like sons to whom He entrusts such responsibility).

And my reason for thinking this includes, among other things, the fact that my scientific friends in a great college of a great university (among them many agnostics and self - identified «atheists») are the very people who often seem to me most aware of mystery in the world, even in the scientific research that they carry on with such devotion and yet with such humiliAnd my reason for thinking this includes, among other things, the fact that my scientific friends in a great college of a great university (among them many agnostics and self - identified «atheists») are the very people who often seem to me most aware of mystery in the world, even in the scientific research that they carry on with such devotion and yet with such humiliand self - identified «atheists») are the very people who often seem to me most aware of mystery in the world, even in the scientific research that they carry on with such devotion and yet with such humiliand yet with such humility.

Knowledge of the existence of a vital third (organic) tradition — the others being Aristotelianism and mechanism — in the seventeenth century, of its early success in promoting scientific discoveries, and of the dubious reasons for its defeat, may help embolden some theologians to revive this tradition, in purified form, in a way that would be beneficial both to the religious life of humanity and its «scientific» understanding of the reality in which it finds itself (p. 41)

Our editorial argues, among other things, that the object of modern science is not a radically delimited subset of the physical realm, and thus that scientific methodology, properly understood, is just a part of that exercise of human reason which is ultimately in profound synthetic harmony with faith.

Im not saying the CIO would teach that or should be use to teach that, but I am saying by your «all mighty» and «superior» testaments to your parenting skills, you should rethink some of the attacks you have towards other people and realize there are just as many «scientific» and purely opinionated reasons your methods may screw your children up as well.

You are clearly unhappy in graduate school and you are spreading propaganda on your website to bring down other graduate students who might be genuinely interested in doing scientific research, which again is the main reason why you should be in grad school in the first place.

A lot of people, both inside and outside the scientific community, are viscerally opposed to the idea of other universes, for the simple reason that we can't observe them — at least as far as we know.

COPENHAGEN — Surely, one reason women scientists are relatively rare on university faculties — in academic leadership posts such as department chairs and deans, on the programs of scientific meetings, as experts interviewed by the media, on boards, and in other prominent positions — is that women are less visible than men.

Writing today in Public Health Reviews, the researchers say that there is now no scientific reason for an upper limit and call on the United Kingdom and other countries to fortify flour with folic acid to reduce the incidence of spina bifida and related disorders.

WASHINGTON — An expert panel has found no scientific reason to believe that electromagnetic fields from power lines, appliances, and other everyday sources cause cancer or other health effects.

It also leads to practices called by such names as «p - hacking» and «data dredging» that emphasize the search for small p - values over other statistical and scientific reasoning.»

Is there a scientific reason for this, and are there other plastics which may be identified by their distinctive sounds?

While I endorse this article's opinions and am opposed to the death penalty, I must disagree with the editors» statement that «scientific protocols for executions can not be established, because killing animal subjects for no reason other than to see what kills them best would clearly be unethical.»

By tracing the development of what we now call the «scientific method» — an approach, developed over centuries, that emphasizes experiments and observations rather than reasoning from first principles — he makes the argument that science, unlike other ways of interpreting the world around us, can offer true progress.

A new study of science PhDs who embarked on careers between 2004 and 2014 showed that while nearly two - thirds chose employment outside academic science, their reasons for doing so had little to do with the advice they received from faculty advisors, other scientific mentors, family, or even graduate school peers.

Phillip Clapham, a cetacean biologist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Mammal Laboratory who has worked extensively with Monnett, says that he and others «never had any reason to question his scientific judgment as anything other than excellent.

Meanwhile, many other countries are attempting to intensify their astronomy and space - sciences capabilities for reasons as diverse as knowledge and technology development, the attracting of students into STEM fields, mastery of crucial satellite data, prestige through participation in major scientific discoveries, and broader international engagement in the sciences.

For that reason, Aliaga and others worry that the expected cuts will spark an exodus of young scientific talent.

«It is well - established that Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases progress from the buildup of multiple misfolded proteins, a key reason why these diseases have proven so challenging to treat,» said Richard Fisher, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Proclara.

In pursuit of that environment, the AAS is committed to the philosophy of equality of opportunity and treatment for all members, regardless of gender, gender identity or expression, race, color, national or ethnic origin, religion or religious belief, age, marital status, sexual orientation, disabilities, veteran status, or any other reason not related to scientific merit.

On the other hand, some scientific evidence hints that higher levels of estrogen lead to an increased activity of the alpha - adrenergic receptors in the lower part of the body, which slow fat release and are the reason why many women have a pear shape fat distribution.

With this thought in mind, the sometimes overwhelming feelings of guilt when saying «no» to something or someone, the selfishness we critically experience when we seemingly put our own needs and wants first before those around us and the insufficiency we are compelled to endure when we are torn between the two, are triumphantly replaced with logic, reason and scientific evidence: I have to give to myself in order to continue to give to others.

While some of these explications may have a basis in legitimate scientific studies, others feel suspiciously vague and circular in their reasoning, using terms like «dopamine» and «pheromones» as hand - waving «proof» that women are hard - wired to do things like gossip and fall in love at first sight.

Power Center focuses on the basics of reading and math, but not to the detriment of other key real - life learning such as financial literacy, persuasive reasoning, or scientific exploration.

Students need a chance to experience the joy of investigating rich concepts in depth and applying innovative mathematical reasoning and justification to a variety of scientific, engineering, and other problems.

If these authors are wrong please use the scientific method — evidence, reasoning, and yes climate models (if predictions vary) to convince others.

It is basically the same reason that denialists inaccurately predicted McCain / Palin would win the presidential election, and put an end to all this AGW carbon cap and trade soc - ialist scientific conspiracy nonsense — noise generated by Limbaugh, Beck, WUWT, and various other political butterflies swirled chaotically throughout the dittosphere, preventing accurate rational assessment of the intermediate term political climate.

Re «acidification» here and some comments in other strings, if this is really about the science, then let's say exactly what we mean so as not to give any reason for contrarians to distract folks from the main, coldly scientific conclusion.)

Indeed, throughout the Science Bulletin paper on Why models run hot, it is self - evident not only that I and my co-authors, including Dr Soon, accept that our returning some CO2 to the atmosphere from which it originally came will cause some global warming, but also that we are thoroughly familiar with the scientific reasons why — all other things being equal — more CO2 in the atmosphere will cause some warming.

I understand the reason for such a «line» on the issue, however i think we're deceiving ourselves AND others if we think it's a scientific basis for action.

In a climate case, more so than any other policy - related case, courts need to inform themselves of the range of scientific opinions, the specific points of agreement and disagreements, the assumptions made by scientists, their theories and reasoning, the validity and accuracy of the models used, the unknowns, uncertainties, and gradations, etc..

Folks on the Al Gore side, in other words, have the situation preposterously backwards: they first should shoot down what skeptics say with superior scientific reasoning and analysis, and then nail the coffin shut by proving precisely how skeptics put out fabricated material bought by «big coal & oil».

Lisbon conference, discussions of scientific method, other reasons for limiting emissions and so on, its all total waste of time, its nothing to do with the key issue.

This is the reason why the scientific method has been so successful: instead of very clever men convincing their less clever fellow - men that they should be in charge of things and dictate policy, it requires those very clever men to design an experiment, make a falsifiable claim as to the outcome of the experiment, measure the actual results of the experiment and then publish their results so that other very clever men can check their claims, verify that the results are reproducible and then refine and test the hypothesis with other experiments.

There is no reference in Eisenhower's speech to ignoring the advice of the National Academy of Sciences (which was established for a reason) and every other serious scientific society in the world in favor of libertarian think tanks and online aggregators of pseudo-scientific nonsense.

Yes, they were interesting (and educational) times, before Climategate I didn't think much about the reasons for the great big new taxes but when Climategate occurred I took an interest and since then have become a skeptic or denialist or whatever the current word is Perhaps what Politicisation has done in the name of science is demonstrate that there are inquiring and courageous scientific and other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sand educational) times, before Climategate I didn't think much about the reasons for the great big new taxes but when Climategate occurred I took an interest and since then have become a skeptic or denialist or whatever the current word is Perhaps what Politicisation has done in the name of science is demonstrate that there are inquiring and courageous scientific and other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sand since then have become a skeptic or denialist or whatever the current word is Perhaps what Politicisation has done in the name of science is demonstrate that there are inquiring and courageous scientific and other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sand courageous scientific and other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sand other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sAnd where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful sand the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful site

From my experience, observation, analysis of documentation, and personal communications with others in the program, I believe it is clear that the reasons for this were essentially political, and not based on scientific considerations.

The claim that rising levels of carbon dioxide are responsible for a global warming that is not happening is entirely without scientific merit and, if for no other reason, should not be the basis for implementing EPA regulation of so - called «greenhouse gas» emissions under the Clean Air Act.

personally, as I have mentioned before I have some issues with this type of reasoning, however, Oreskes and others argue that this is an acceptable form of scientific reasoning, I enjoy seeing where that leads.

The only reason this the cosmic ray effect is included in the report at all was so that it could acknowledge and then disprove all other theories — it's standard scientific procedure.

Would it be out of order to expect that should that communication indicate there were time «pressures» and / or other «less than scientific reasons» for a rush to publication that the reputations of the scientists and certainly NOAA won't be tarnished.

Whereas your evidence from the UEA says very clearly that this is part of the published scientific record that you were doing it and the reasons you were doing that, and that can be criticised or agreed with by other scientists.

She believes that «there is no reason to believe that the politically charged arena of climate science is exempt from» the problems found in other scientific research, «or that it doesn't share the alarming rates of irreproducibility observed in medicine, economics and psychology.»

I have great faith in a higher purpose behind what reveals itself in the physical universe and I see no reason for any of it to conflict with my belief in evolution or any other well - vetted «scientific» theories.