Sentences with phrase «scientific claims supporting»

Medical Affairs executives, particularly Vice Presidents, combine commercial - side business meetings with a charter to supervise research strategy, manage clinical studies, and validate scientific claims supporting specific products.

(UCS, 2007) The front groups working on environmental issues main mission is often to create doubt about the scientific claims supporting environmental concern.

Not exact matches

The FDA has applied the same kind of scrutiny to claims that marijuana - derived products can help prevent, treat, or cure cancer (claims which aren't supported by any existing scientific evidence).

Although that's hardly a massive sample size, the viewers» complaint that these claims were unscientific was rejected; the ASA said it «did not expect skin «toning» claims to be supported by independent scientific evidence.»

I want the citations to the peer - reviewed scientific resesrch, published in scientific refereed journals that support what you claim.

You aren't possibly saying that any scientific finding that supports the theistic claim that the universe had a beginning, be rejected, simply because it supports the theistic claim?

Then by all means, post the names of these many scientists, their qualifications, the research centers where they work, the age ranges they propose along with the scientific research that supports their claims.

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Although the paper employs some materials from contemporary economics, they are used to buttress its theological contentions in the way that creationists use bits of science to support their claim that the Bible is a scientific textbook.

I have to use logic and reason due to the utter lack of empirical scientific evidence to support the god claim.

You can't claim science supports some aspect of Christianity if the results of scientific expirementation can not be trusted.

Islam mentioned this for the longest time and as you can imagine, at a time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him), from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.

«disengenuous»: a Christian citing a atheist scientist to support any scientific claim

The claim is I believe the bible and its account of creation, but I also admit there is scientific evidence to support that the earth is very old.

But Topher, keep in mind that if God can bend scientific laws as He chooses, there is no point in using ANY science, including science you claim supports the Bible.

There seems to be a consensus among the evolutionary creationists that the intelligent design folks have not provided sufficient data to support their claims and are therefore not taken seriously by the scientific community.

Well, it's been several hours since I last requested that one of the fundiots who keep claiming that gays choose to be gay, post the citations to the peer - reviewed scientific research supporting that contention.

Since you, like other fundiots claim that gays choose to gay, why don't you go ahead and post the citations to the peer - reviewed scientific research that supports this idea?

They have no scientific evidence to support their claims yet they have taken children out of school to proclaim their «message» and now they're traipsing about telling others to do the same!

However, there is currently no scientific evidence supporting these claims.

All health claims are required to be supported by scientific evidence.

All health claims are required to be supported by scientific evidence, and each proposed relationship between an ingredient and a claim must meet the same level of certainty, whether they are pre-approved by the Food Standards of Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), or they are self - substantiated by food businesses.

Standard 1.2.7 ensures consumers and health professionals can have confidence that health claims are well supported by scientific evidence, and it helps consumers make informed food choices.

Did you know that there is little scientific evidence to support its weight loss claims?

Unfortunately, such claims must be relegated to the domain of gardening lore because of the lack of scientific evidence to support them.

Scientific research has yet to support such claims, but there's no denying that goji berries are rich in plant - based antioxidants and compounds.

For years, it seems, MomsTEAM has been getting e-mails from mouth guard manufacturers touting their products as reducing the risk of concussion, despite the lack of any peer - reviewed scientific studies to support their claims.

There's absolutely no scientific evidence to support this claim, and it doesn't make any sense.

When new parents see this kind of marketing for infant formula, they're likely to believe such claims are based on rigorous scientific support, or maybe even actual testing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

- we need an experiment when we claim that SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH supports our claims of a casual link between formula and SIDS.

They also found that «most health claims about supplementation of omega - 3 long - chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in various diseases in children and adolescents are not supported by convincing scientific data.»

This breastfeeding position involves your baby lying on his back, while you crouch over him on all fours and dangle your nipple in his mouth.4 Some mums say doing this for short periods helps if they have conditions like mastitis and don't want their breasts to be squashed or touched; others claim that gravity helps unplug blocked milk ducts, although there's no scientific evidence to support this yet.

Fourth, you keep referring to the research that you have done, yet you cite no scientific papers in support of your claims, which suggests to me that you have done nothing more than read the propaganda written by other homebirth advocates.

OK, I haven't read any scientific data to support my claim, but it's a thing, you guys.

Coaches, consumers and parents should be aware that while the STAR rating system suggests the purchase of specific football helmets, scientific evidence does not support the claim that a particular helmet brand or model is more effective in reducing the occurrence of concussive events.

There is no scientific evidence to support this claim, and yet massive advertising campaigns have been launched to convince Canadian mothers that Nestlé's formula contains the same vital ingredients as breastmilk.

Coaches, consumers and parents should be aware that while the STAR rating system suggests the purchase of specific football helmets, scientific evidence does not support the claim that a particular helmet brand or model is mor

He thinks that 6 months would be more appropriate (from a medical perspective), but I could not find any scientific article to support this claim.

Despite the lack of scientific support, his claims remain popular with climate deniers.

Thatcher could support the reforms, Agar argues, because she «had lived the life of the working research scientist, as a final - year chemistry student in Dorothy Hodgkin's x-ray crystallography laboratory, as an investigator of glues for BX [plastics company] and as a food chemist for Lyons & Co.... [I] t was precisely because Thatcher knew what scientific research was like that made her impervious to claims that science was a special case, with special features and incapable of being understood by outsiders, and therefore that science policy should be left in the hands of scientists.

Exposing them inevitably undermined the case for the practices, and often the wider credibility of the scientific institutions supporting the exaggerated claims of safety.

That paper, which appeared in the journal Critical Reviews in Toxicology, reviewed the IARC findings and concluded the scientific research didn't support claims that glyphosate posed a risk of genetic toxicity.

Although green skies have been observed during thunderstorms, there is little scientific evidence to support claims that hail and tornadoes are sure to follow.

In magazines, books and newsletters, smart drug enthusiasts cite an impressive string of scientific papers to support their claims.

That said, the most outspoken creationists have a long history of ignoring, selectively citing, or simply distorting the evidence in order to support their conclusions — which is to say that they are not following the procedures of the scientific method, and their claims should be viewed accordingly.

Paul Leventhal, who heads the Nuclear Control Institute, a lobby group in Washington DC, says the German claims that MOX fuel would not disperse after an aircraft crash are not supported by scientific evidence.

While research has shown that nearly one quarter of the global burden of disease can be attributed to poor environmental quality, very little scientific evidence supports the claim that the conservation of ecosystems benefits human health.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

On the other hand, these results support the scientific status of the social sciences against claims that they are completely subjective, by showing that, when they adopt a scientific approach to discovery, they differ from the natural sciences only by a matter of degree.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 percent over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.