Not exact matches
In these questions there is doubtless at work in Aristotle's mind a concept of bodies that is pragmatically oriented to the world of things, a concept that Whitehead, from the higher vantage point afforded by modem scientific knowledge, is able to dismis
In these
questions there is doubtless at work
in Aristotle's mind a concept of bodies that is pragmatically oriented to the world of things, a concept that Whitehead, from the higher vantage point afforded by modem scientific knowledge, is able to dismis
in Aristotle's mind a
concept of bodies that is pragmatically oriented to the world of things, a
concept that Whitehead, from the higher vantage point afforded by modem
scientific knowledge, is able to dismiss.
Like Wittgenstein, Whitehead is not, of course, opposed to the
concept of a «philosophical illness;» the difference lies
in the seriousness with which the two thinkers approach traditional philosophical issues: Wittgenstein seems to see no legitimacy
in questions that science or common sense can not answer, while Whitehead struggles with classical metaphysical problems, stepping beyond the strict boundaries of the
scientific method.
I don't always explain the full
scientific principles to my children, but watching and taking part
in activities like these really does encourage children start to
question why things happen, and the
concepts we introduce will become start to make more sense to them as time goes on.
I try to reproduce that distance
in my works, juxtaposing everyday objects and
scientific concepts,
in order to produce
questions about how we perceive the world.»
I asked Rob a
question posed
in comments here a couple of months ago by Steven Earl Salmony, a psychologist who is an impassioned champion of reining
in population growth: Does the
concept of the demographic transition, which takes societies from high birth and death rates
in deep poverty to aging and stable populations as they advance, have the weight of
scientific theory or is it far less established?
As Mike noted, we should stay focused on the suite of (very interesting and) important
scientific questions raised by this post — especially those related to the idea of spatial / temporal patterns of climate data
in relation to
concepts and models of their likely physical causes.
Robin McKie and Nell Boase are
in the studio to discuss this year's Edge
Question: What
scientific concept would improve everybody's cognitive toolkit?