This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading
scientific consensus report produced in 2008 by the Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO): «Forests and Energy, Key Issues» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading
scientific consensus report produced in 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO): «World Malaria Report» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading
scientific consensus report produced in 2010 by The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP):» Proceedings of the GESAMP International Workshop on micro - plastic particles as a vector in transporting persistent, bio - accumulating and toxic substances in the oceans» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading
scientific consensus report produced in 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO):» Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance in the World» Learn more...
Sifting through some half a million studies, nine independent research teams from around the globe created a landmark
scientific consensus report reviewed by 21 of the top cancer researchers in the world.
This Digest is a faithful summary of two leading
scientific consensus reports produced in 2003 and 2004 by the World Health Organization (WHO):» Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide» and» Answer to follow - up questions from CAFE (2004)» Learn more...
Not exact matches
The overwhelming
consensus and the unanimous
Scientific Advisory Committee's
report indicate that television violence, indeed, does have an adverse effect on certain members of our society.
Scientific consensus that humans cause climate change is akin to the scientific consensus that smoking causes cancer, says a report released today by the American Association for the Advancement o
Scientific consensus that humans cause climate change is akin to the
scientific consensus that smoking causes cancer, says a report released today by the American Association for the Advancement o
scientific consensus that smoking causes cancer, says a
report released today by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
The results affirm the strong and growing
scientific consensus developing from the understanding of the physical origins and consequences of climate change, as outlined in the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Working Group 1
report last September.
«Given the
scientific consensus that climate change represents a real threat, we might expect the IPCC
report to exhibit a more assertive style, yet they don't,» said Medimorec.
The Soon and Baliunas paper produced political results in one respect: it seems to have emboldened the Bush administration to edit a June Environmental Protection Agency
report so that it no longer represented a
scientific consensus about climate change.
The
report defines «very likely» as a greater than 90 % probability and represents the
consensus of the
scientific community.
IWC's
Scientific Committee examined the new program but last June
reported that it could not reach
consensus on the overall program.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these
scientific findings on climate change, even as the global
consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the
scientific community, including the
reports commissioned by the skeptical Bush White House.
If the
scientific consensus disagrees with that opinion, political appointees rewrite the
reports, and dissenters are left off of science advisory boards.»
An IWC statement accompanying the
report says: «It was not possible for the
Scientific Committee to reach a
consensus view of the overall program.»
A new paper published just this month
reported that respondents across the political spectrum responded positively to information about the
scientific consensus on climate change.
«There is a growing
consensus in the
scientific community that small doses of pesticides and other chemicals can have adverse effects on health, especially during vulnerable periods such as fetal development and childhood,»
reports author and physician Andrew Weil, a leading voice for so - called integrative medicine combining conventional and alternative medical practices.
According to Evanega, the high quality of the
report could help improve the policy environment for GE crop use and to convince more people that there is
scientific consensus about the safety of GE technology and that biotechnology can help the country respond to climate change.
The IPCC, the United Nations institution that compiles the
scientific consensus on global warming, has issued a series of
reports since 1990 based on those models.
Reports and
scientific consensus statements inform the policy debate but can not resolve it.
Fact check: Actual
scientific consensus on global warming (from real scientists that research and publish scrutinized
reports) is getting stronger.
Government funding may remain one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the
report, despite the
consensus among astronomers and astrophysicists about their
scientific priorities.
By distilling and organizing the existing research on cognitive science and educational psychology, the
reports offer teacher candidates concise summaries of high - impact practices grounded in
scientific evidence and professional
consensus around PK - 12 learning.
The cognitive principles of learning are based on
reports from (a) the National Academy of Sciences, 1 (b) a practice guide for teachers by the Institute of Education Sciences in the U.S. Department of Education on Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning, 2 (c) and a joint initiative between the Association of Psychological Sciences and the American Psychological Association on Lifelong Learning at Work and at Home.3 The recommendations here reflect the wisdom of these
reports, which are based on
scientific evidence, rather than being
consensus opinions of experts.
The
report provides transportation professionals with an overview of the
scientific consensus on current and future climate changes of particular relevance to U.S. transportation, including the limitations of present
scientific understanding as to their precise timing, magnitude, and geographic location; identifies potential impacts on U.S. transportation and adaptation options; and, offers recommendations for both research and actions that can be taken to prepare for climate change.
If someone heard what Trump said, and they wanted to check it against «authoritative / credible orgs like NASA, NOAA and the IPCC
reports, they'd find that «current
scientific consensus there» is that ASI may not be anywhere near summer ice free until the 2090s......
But for those of us who follow Hansen, Spratt, Monbiot, and many others in the tail of a much more serious climate change story: non-linear, with positive feedbacks, tipping points, time lags and thresholds, we need a much more robust and focused
scientific consensus now, without waiting years for the next IPCC
reports, in time to win the crucial 08 election because the solution must be now, global and America must be a leader.
«Over the past several years a clear
scientific consensus has emerged,» Cohen wrote in September 1982,
reporting on Exxon's own analysis of climate models.
After reading your post, Kerry Emanuel's website I feel strongly that there is a strong
consensus on hurricanes and global warming in the
scientific community (in spite of media
reports and advocacy statements to the contrary).
The
reports largely tracked the
scientific consensus at the time, according to the study, forthcoming in Environmental Research Letters.
When an economist at the Environmental Protection Agency rejected the Obama administration's stance on global warming by writing an unsolicited
report challenging the
scientific consensus on greenhouse dangers, groups fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases hailed him as a courageous maverick.
Some researchers do not feel that their pet theories and ideas have been given enough emphasis in the IPCC
reports and in other expressions of
scientific consensus.
Necessarily, then, it can't explain why one and the same set of informational influences (e.g., stories
reporting «
scientific consensus» on climate change) provoke different reactions in identifiable subcommunities.
The «
Report» says: «The
scientific consensus is clear: Global «warming» is real, and it is already happening.
A front - page article and headline on April 24
reported that the Global Climate Coalition, a group that throughout the 1990s represented industries with profits tied to fossil fuels, knew about the
scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions could cause global warming but ignored it in a lobbying and public relations campaign against efforts to curb emissions.
In a 2012 paper, «The pivotal role of perceived
scientific consensus in acceptance of science,» Lewandowsky and his co-authors
reported on two studies.
quote: «Despite the 97 % expert
consensus on human - caused global warming supported by peer - reviewed research, expert opinion, the IPCC
reports, and National Academies of Science and other
scientific organizations from around the world, a large segment of the population remains unconvinced on the issue.»
a new
consensus will form for the next U.N. climate change
report... but... lurking beneath it will remain, as always, the churning theories and rivalries, the questions, the grist of
scientific life.
The
scientific consensus over the reality and causes of global warming has grown stronger over the past decade, as reflected in the widely publicized
reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
23 Sept: Live Science: Becky Oskin: Climate Scientists: IPCC
Report Must Communicate Consensus Climate experts also told LiveScience they would like to see the new report stress the scientific consensus on climate change, and emphasize the link between human activities and global wa
Report Must Communicate
Consensus Climate experts also told LiveScience they would like to see the new
report stress the scientific consensus on climate change, and emphasize the link between human activities and global wa
report stress the
scientific consensus on climate change, and emphasize the link between human activities and global warming.
The thing which is routinely mistaken as evidence of a
scientific consensus — the IPCC
reports — is not a product of a
consensus.
«If he'd cared to read the
report [Sarcasm, lowest form of wit — Ed], he would find pages of [alarmist]
scientific references in it [and none that challenged the
consensus],» Professor Steffen said.
By editing CNN and PBS news stories so that some saw a skeptic included in the
report, others saw a story in which the skeptic was edited out and another group saw no video, Krosnick found that adding 45 seconds of a skeptic to one news story caused 11 % of Americans to shift their opinions about the
scientific consensus.
On the contrary, even as confidence in the mainstream
scientific consensus was solidified be the released of the IPPP Fourth Assessment
Report in 2007, the rightwing opponents of science were buoyed by the La Nina event of early 2008, which produced a sharp, but temporary drop in temperatures, particularly in the Pacific.
For example, the widely touted «
consensus» of 2,500 scientists on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an illusion: Most of the panelists have no
scientific qualifications, and many of the others object to some part of the IPCC's
report.
«Claims of the existence of a
scientific consensus as reflected in IPCC
reports fail to recognise that the IPCC itself undertakes no
scientific research.
The New York Times
reported on August 19 that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will soon issue its 5th assessment
report that will state that the
scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change has increased from a 90 % probability in 2007 to a 95 % probability in the new
report.
By 1988, the EPI
report said, the Electric Power Research Institute, supported by the industry, acknowledged «a growing
consensus in the
scientific community that the greenhouse effect is real.»
As a matter of law, the IPCC
reports can not be assumed to be either representative of a
scientific consensus, or free from political influence and value judgments; this would need to be established independently for each specific statement.