The memo does not mention postdocs, but it opens the way for those making major
scientific contributions to projects to receive the official acknowledgement as full - fledged independent researchers that has traditionally been the exclusive prerogative of faculty members.
Not exact matches
As associate professor and first - author Johan Bollen writes in an e-mail
to Science Careers, they wanted their new system
to «enable scientists
to set their own priorities, fund scientists... not
projects, avoid proposal writing and reviewing, avoid administrative burdens, encourage all scientists
to participate collectively in the definition of
scientific priorities, encourage innovation, reward scientists that make significant
contributions to data, software, methods, and systems, avoid funding death spirals (no funding - > no research - > no funding) but still reward high levels of productivity, create the proper incentives for scholarly communication (publishing
to communicate, not
to improve bibliometrics), enable funding of daring and risky research, and so on.»
My job has been
to be the spider in the web — collecting information from the 24 partners, everything from administrative data
to their
scientific contributions, their expertise, and their expectations of the
project, while making sure we meet the Commission's deadlines.
The massive
projects needed now — such as devising a model of climate change detailed enough
to be truly predictive or batteries efficient enough
to compete with gasoline — can not wait or depend on chancy funding, he believes.He added that a strong national commitment
to goal - centered basic science could help solve other important problems by drawing America's talented young people into
scientific work and providing them with better opportunities for aspiring researchers
to build careers with a realistic chance of making both a significant
scientific contribution and a decent living.
(2) that prior
to the submission of an application for PHS support for a research
project on which the Respondent's participation is proposed and prior
to Respondent's participation in any capacity on PHS - supported research, Respondent shall ensure that a plan for supervision of Respondent's duties is submitted
to ORI for approval; the supervision plan must be designed
to ensure the
scientific integrity of Respondent's research
contribution; Respondent agreed that he shall not participate in any PHS - supported research until such a supervision plan is submitted
to and approved by ORI; Respondent agreed
to maintain responsibility for compliance with the agreed upon supervision plan;
Since joining the Laboratory in 2000, Michael Heffner has made exceptional
scientific and technical
contributions to a number
projects, and in so doing has established two high - visibility programs.
Péter Ábrahám, research advisor at Konkoly Observatory and the leader of the Hungarian MATISSE
project emphasizes that «the successful Hungarian
contribution to MATISSE shows a good example for a synergy between high - tech instrument development and world - class
scientific research using the most powerful astronomical instruments.
This work is a
contribution to the European
Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA), a joint European Science Foundation / European Commission
scientific program, funded by the European Commission and by national
contributions from Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.