Sentences with phrase «scientific conversations about»

Recommended for good long scientific conversations about genomics, origins of species, and DNA.»

Anyway, the scientific conversation about ocean cooling went on.

---- Indeed, she did not, and having any legitimate scientific conversation about record warm years without discussing ENSO is an error of omission that should not be coming from a scientific authority.

Not exact matches

It doesn't take a carefully designed scientific study to prove that bland, repetitive conversations about the weather or your local sports team can bore you silly.

I always get in a conversation about how it takes more faith to pursue science than religion and how many scientific universities were created by early monks.

Studies about the lasting importance of a child's experiences in the first three years of life, once relegated to scientific or academic journals, are now fueling a broad national conversation about what this growing body of research means for families and communities across the country.

Fearnley expressed hope that the resources will spark conversations about science outside the scientific community.

National scientific organizations should attend a SACNAS conference to determine what could be incorporated into their own national meetings in order to help their membership have meaningful conversations about diversity.

By giving personal testimony about our paths through our studies and our profession, we hope to engage students in conversations about scientific careers.

Scientific American was the conference media partner and our executive editor, Fred Guterl, joined them for a conversation about the future of the technological world that we're building today.

Sullivan urged scientists to contribute constructively to conversations about the role of scientific enterprise, calling for a buildup of the «stores of scientific knowledge» rather than investment only in what we think may yield immediate benefits.

When I saw this position advertised, it really resonated with me as an opportunity to provide leadership in a national conversation about where the scientific workforce is headed.

By focusing on a specific set of case studies to which genomic techniques might be applied we will be able to drill down on these scientific challenges but also open the larger conversation about the rights and responsibilities of these new technologies.

Thus far, much of the conversation about postdocs and their roles in the scientific workforce has been enmeshed in wider discussions of biomedical research policy [9,10].

As I travel around the country, facilitating community conversations about the topics in my book Mind Over Medicine: Scientific Proof That You Can Heal Yourself, many patients have expressed frustration with their doctors, claiming that they feel unheard.

As I travel around the country, facilitating community conversations about the topics in my book Mind Over Medicine: Scientific Proof That You Can...

There really is no excuse for hawking a diet pill without credible scientific evidence to back it, but is this misstep worth bringing down a whole empire that has sprouted conversations about health and wellness that may have otherwise never taken place?

Across the United States and around the world, in both public and private sectors, the work of the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child has helped change the conversation about providing young children with a healthy, safe, and nurturing start in life.»

The artist employs a variety of techniques to explore technological, scientific, and biological systems of perception and representation, instigating constructive conversations about the ways people see their bodies and minds, and construct their identities.

Ben Lillie and Virginia Hughes began a TEDxNewYork conversation about science and culture at Untitled Space in Tribeca by taking a look at why this kind of headline whiplash happens in the press: because science journalism has been structured around reporting on single studies as they are published in scientific journals.

The op - ed favorably cited by Mike Mann says this explcitly, «That means we need to clearly say there is no scientific debate about climate change — and instead shift the conversation to next steps... Those of us who write opinion need to press for public - policy action, steps that move us as a planet forward.

It's understandable how, if a person had never once consulted a scientific paper or sat down for a serious, ideology - free conversation about climate change with one of the overwhelming majority of scientists who agree that man - made climate change is a real, observable phenomenon, he could be confused into thinking that the greatest challenge of our time is comparable to the medieval superstitious that arose in the absence of scientific understanding.

In conversations about climate change, two different worlds tend to emerge: the scientific community and public opinion.

The President has reportedly told U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt during several conversations that he supports Pruitt's plan for a «red - team, blue - team» debate aimed at challenging the prevailing scientific consensus about humans» impact on climate change, a senior administration official reportedly told E&E News.

I call it normal in that I have heard such discussions, criticisms, and conversations for decades about scientific research by scientists themselves.

We submitted our paper to an open - access «Discussion» journal (ACPD) in hopes of engaging the scientific and policy - making communities in an important conversation about the urgency of reducing fossil fuel emissions and the adequacy of current and proposed policies.

The project, funded through a grant from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, includes original research into how Jacksonville residents currently think and talk about children's issues, and how the public conversation might be reframed to include a more scientific understanding of the social determinants of child wellbeing.

Studies about the lasting importance of a child's experiences in the first three years of life, once relegated to scientific or academic journals, are now fueling a broad national conversation about what this growing body of research means for families and communities across the country.