«This is an amazing opportunity to change
the scientific culture of a country and connect the community closely... to the world of science and technology,» he adds.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, a whole
culture has arisen in this
country that denies basic
scientific facts at the behest
of misguided religious and political groups for both idealogical and economic reasons.
Former Washington Post Beijing bureau chief, Philip Pan, author
of Out
of Mao's Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul
of a New China, discusses the science, technology, environment and
culture of China with
Scientific American's David Biello, who recently spent almost a month reporting from the
country.
Aspects
of China's
scientific culture make many «first - rate academics reluctant to return home to participate in the
country's expected rise to superpower status.»
We need more
scientific idols that exemplify that there are no borders in science, neither between
countries nor between
cultures or schools
of thoughts.
His idea was to create a new way
of stimulating
scientific innovation in Spain such that it steered clear
of the civil servant
culture that plagued the
country.
The
countries in question undertake to improve fisheries governance in the region by upgrading data collection and
scientific evaluation, establishing an ecosystem - based fisheries management framework and developing a
culture of compliance to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.
The reasons for that are many: the timid language
of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «
scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the
country is dominated by a group
of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing
culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed
of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now
of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million)
of the numbers; the discomfort
of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale
of that problem, which amounts to the prospect
of our own annihilation; simple fear.