This is an amazingly eloquent and insightful essay that provides some important insights into
the scientific debate on climate change, and addresses the concerns raised by Jeb Bush.
Take a look at the jump to article on Twitter: «Polarization in
the scientific debate on the health effects of salt washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2…» now, 6 hours ago.
«Mounting evidence has forced an end to any serious
scientific debate on whether humans are causing global warming.
The second example is
the scientific debate on climate change.
In an October 2005 op - ed article Dr Kurt M. Cuffey stated «Mounting evidence has forced an end to any serious
scientific debate on whether humans are causing global warming».
That being said, can you really say that there is no legitimate
scientific debate on paleoclimate and climate sensitivity?
We are told that global warming is increasing the intensity of hurricanes, but not provided information on the great amount of uncertainty and vigorous
scientific debate on this issue.
«He has no patience with people who persist in believing there is still
scientific debate on climate change.
Dr Curry said the sensitivity of climate to increasing concentrations of CO2 was at the heart of
the scientific debate on anthropogenic climate change, and also the public debate on the appropriate policy response to increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
As it presumes such a value judgement, the oft - used term «catastrophe» has no place within
the scientific debate on climate change.
Climate Change Reconsidered is an immensely important contribution to genuine
scientific debate on issues where unscientific fear - mongering has thus far triumphed.
However, readers of my column will know that I give contrarians, or sceptics, or deniers (call them what you will) short shrift, and as a close follower of
the scientific debate on this subject I can state without doubt that there is no dispute whatsoever within the expert community as to the reality or causes of manmade global warming.
With the likes of Al Gore running around in a near panic, pushing his awful Chicken Little film, honest
scientific debate on the subject has become all but impossible.
But this representation of a survey of over 2,200 peer - reviewed scientific articles on climate change published from November 12, 2012 through December 31, 2013 — which originally ran in Desmog Blog — adds another dimension, exposing the myth of
scientific debate on the issue with a single (almost entirely) blue dot.
Significant
scientific debate on this paper took place on the INTERNET (Ref.
The author is concerned that unscientific attempts have been made — urged on by sensationalized media reports — to deem CO2 / Global Warming as a fait accompli, and to marginalize, if not completely stifle
any scientific debate on the topic.
I'm not aware of any vigorous
scientific debate on this — indeed there seems to be a clear consensus on the point.
This is where
the scientific debate on global warming comes in.
However, the real place for
the scientific debate on AGW is in the scientific literature — where, so far as the basics point are concerned — that greenhouse gases are responsible for most 20th century warming, and curbing emissions is urgent — it's long been settled.
If you've followed
the scientific debate on global warming and hurricanes, you will recognize many of the characters in Mooney's tale (yours truly even gets mentioned a few times:)-RRB-.
For example, who has worked to stop sensible progress restraining carbon emissions and oil demand, muzzled an open
scientific debate on on these issues, kept secret the participants in high level meetings to develop energy policy, vetoed one measure after another that would have advanced his country ever so little in a direction towards climate restraint.
In addition, in the Introduction, we discussed the basis for
the scientific debate on the variation in Au.
Reflecting
the scientific debate on the action of cannabinoids, there are numerous disputes regarding the legal status of marijuana.
Blom therefore calls for
the scientific debate on this group of synmptoms to be conducted in a way that will do justice both to the complexity of the issue and its seriousness.
As dramatic and natural changes in the environment and the arrival of people to the continent roughly coincide in time,
a scientific debate on what caused the demise of this fauna continues.
The authors of this study welcome the continued public and
scientific debate on this important subject.
The reason that educated people are «uncurious» about this is the simple fact that there is
NO scientific debate on this issue whatsoever.
I'm not in, or an apologist for, the industry; I'm just interested in a reasonable
scientific debate on an activity that seems to have the potential to add a great deal of value (including in disadvantaged indigenous communities if the resources are on Native Title lands) and enhance Australian energy security.
The current ethical, political, and
scientific debates on stem cells pitch the benefits and limitations of 2 cell types against each other, adult vs embryonic stem cells.
My favorite line reflects on the importance of placing
scientific debates on the edges of understanding in the context of established knowledge: «Disagreement about how to model the flight of a Frisbee correctly doesn't imply that basic aerodynamics are wrong.»
Not exact matches
The State Department's long - awaited environmental report
on the Keystone XL pipeline leaves President Barack Obama with no real
scientific reason to reject the nation's most fiercely
debated energy project.
Scientific evidence
on the origins of ho - mose - xuality is considered relevant to theological and social
debate because it undermines suggestions that se - xual orientation is a choice.»
What the ancient
debates on the question of the embryo have in common is a
scientific adherence to what is empirically known about the embryo.
Scientific evidence
on the origins of homosexuality is considered relevant to theological and social
debate because it undermines suggestions that sexual orientation is a choice.»
There is NO serious
debate within the
scientific community about whether or not evolution is real, just differing opinions
on how it works.
His father, an Episcopal clergyman, had as a young man paid careful attention to the
debate between Thomas Huxley and William Gladstone
on the
scientific reliability of Genesis.
Harrison also unfolds Augustine's insightful contribution to the science — religion
debate, drawing out a number of valuable principles — not least, recommending restraint where issues are not clear, and avoiding bringing Christianity into contempt by arguing for false
scientific opinions
on the supposed grounds of scriptural warrant.
The manner in which this
debate has been carried
on, if it is truly indicative of the thinking of the participants in it, should trouble — even alarm — those who are concerned for the continued success of the
scientific enterprise.
Throughout the ongoing
debate over the definition of marriage, Right Wing bigots have cited the damage caused by hom.ose.xuality and hom.os.exual relationships in an attempt to justify legal discrimination against gays.The
scientific evidence
on the matter is out there.
Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting
on head injuries rests with some members of the
scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth
debates at large academic conferences.
She obviously thinks she know enough science to write a book promoting the safety of homebirth, run a website promoting the safety of homebirth, write articles in magazines and
on websites like The Daily Beast promoting the safety of homebirth, but she doesn't think you know enough to
debate the
scientific evidence about the safety of homebirth?
In a recent book by Dr. Peter Cook (Mothering Denied) describes better than most others the difficulties that Dr. Jay Belsky has had convincing his fellow scientists that social ideology is passing for, if not dictating,
scientific interpretations of studies
on this issue (as is true for the bedsharing
debate), in favor of dismissing the serious concerns and negative developmental correlates of infants and children being placed for long hours, early in their lives, in daycare centers.
It is false to claim that there is still a «
debate» going
on over the origins of the Giant's Causeway, because the creationist viewpoint has no
scientific evidence to back it up, and it is completely wrong to portray it
on an equal footing with the genuine
scientific account.
For years our endless war
on drugs has been driven more by tabloid headlines then
scientific evidence, with newspapers getting to define the terms of the
debate.
«In choosing to plough ahead with the barbaric cull in our countryside, the coalition government has shown complete contempt for
scientific evidence
on bovine TB,» Green MP Caroline Lucas, one of the five sponsors of the
debate, commented.
According to Avella, Cuomo's office has not shed enough light
on the medical and
scientific sides of the hydrofracking
debate, with opponents arguing that water supplies might become contaminated or ruined due to harmful chemicals used in the process.
Bruce Beutler, 2011 Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine, «lost his HHMI funding and did the work shortly after that,» said Carl Rhodes, HHMI's senior
scientific officer, during a
debate on transformative research in Barcelona last May.
The letter, which included a statement
on climate science by the leaders of 18
scientific societies, stated, «Although
debate about policy options exists, climate change is not a scientifically - controversial topic.»
Science sought to shed light
on the issues and future of GM food crops in India by bringing together two prominent voices in the
scientific community in a
debate.
The findings shed light
on the effectiveness of whooping cough vaccines in the U.S. — a subject of intense
scientific debate — and may help guide future vaccination campaigns and public health strategies.