Sentences with phrase «scientific debate on the topic»

The author is concerned that unscientific attempts have been made — urged on by sensationalized media reports — to deem CO2 / Global Warming as a fait accompli, and to marginalize, if not completely stifle any scientific debate on the topic.

Not exact matches

The letter, which included a statement on climate science by the leaders of 18 scientific societies, stated, «Although debate about policy options exists, climate change is not a scientifically - controversial topic.»

This is a forum for these researchers and physicians to debate and discuss new theories and data on topics selected by the Scientific Committee.

These seminars provide a unique opportunity for the local scientific community to debate with world - class experts on hot topics such as Molecular Oncology, Genomics and Proteomics, Bioinformatics etc..

Debates are interesting, but often what's more interesting — especially on topics such as nutrition science, which depend on many scientific papers — is what people can compose when the time constraints of a live debate aren't imposed on them.

While several benefits of HGH have been clinically proven, the «effect» on penis size can be a topic of huge debate mainly because there are no scientific studies done on it except a few like this one which was done on young boys with growth hormone deficiency.

Dr. Wilson was recently on the New Zealand current affairs program Close - Up explaining the concept of adrenal fatigue to New Zealand, but was told in a live debate with Associate Professor of Medicine at the Dunedin School of Medicine, Dr Patrick Manning, that in his opinion (inspite of over 3000 scientific papers published on the topic) that adrenal fatigue «simply does not exist» and that Addison's Disease is the only medically recognised form of adrenal insufficiency.

Drawing on a lifetime of scientific study and religious practice, he explores many of the great debates and makes astonishing connections between seemingly disparate topics — such as evolution and karma — that will change the way we look at our world... Only one other book — the New York Times bestselling Ethics for the New Millennium — has been published with such intense personal involvement from the Dalai Lama himself.

You said: «Like i've said 10 times before, this topic is not my expertise, it is an immature field with many uncertainties, so I am not motivated to dig into any scientific nuances here and debate them publicly in a forum like RC that has a great deal of hostility on this topic owing to pent up frustration, battle scars, whatever.»

Goal of ClimateDialogue.org ClimateDialogue.org offers a platform for discussions between invited climate scientists on important climate topics that have been subject to quite intense scientific and public debate.

Though scientific consensus must always be open to responsible skepticism given: (a) the strength of the consensus on this topic, (b) the enormity of the harms predicted by the consensus view, (c) an approximately 30 year delay in taking action that has transpired since a serious climate change debate began in the United States in the early 1980s, (d) a delay that has made the problem worse while making it more difficult to achieve ghg emissions reductions necessary to prevent dangerous climate change because of the steepness of reductions now needed, no politician can ethically justify his or her refusal to support action on climate change based upon a personal opinion that is not supported by strong scientific evidence that has been reviewed by scientific organizations with a wide breadth of interdisciplinary scientific expertise.

I can respect his journal publications on the topic, that is what scientific debate is about, his other comments tend to be a bit more silly but at least he is for real.

The whole essence of a great university is to embrace differences in opinion on topics and encourage the debate to hash out the scientific truth (even if it may be politically difficult to swallow).

In an exceptional move, the ethics committee of the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) last week decried the public - relations offensive as inappropriate for a high - quality and objective scientific debate, and reminded researchers working on controversial topics of the need to report results responsibly to tScientific Research (CNRS) last week decried the public - relations offensive as inappropriate for a high - quality and objective scientific debate, and reminded researchers working on controversial topics of the need to report results responsibly to tscientific debate, and reminded researchers working on controversial topics of the need to report results responsibly to the public.