Sentences with phrase «scientific evidence of the impacts»

Compiled by 80 scientists from 12 countries, it highlights detectable scientific evidence of impacts on marine life, from microorganisms to mammals, which are likely to increase significantly even under a low emissions scenario.

Not exact matches

APPPAH educates professionals and the public worldwide, as shown through scientific discoveries and continually emerging evidence, that prenatal and perinatal experiences have a profound impact on the subsequent quality of health and human behavior and that life is a continuum which starts before conception, not after birth.

«According to the US Food and Drug Administration, the scientific evidence is «mixed» over the benefits of adding ARA and DHA to baby formula, with no currently available published studies on the long - term impact.

The small studies that chiropractors refer to as evidence have been criticised for having poor scientific design that may have impacted the results, for example there was room for unconscious biases and one study did not record the number of dropouts and reasons for dropping out.

A photograph of an insect, plant or animal, tagged with the date and location where it was taken, can provide valuable scientific data, e.g., on how urban sprawl impacts local ecosystems or evidence of local, regional or global climactic shifts.

But it's the science pointing to possible human health impacts that has Schulz convinced that there's more than enough scientific evidence to begin a phase - out of lead ammunition.

Olson said the giant impact argument for the formation of the moon is the most prevalent scientific hypothesis on how Earth satellite was formed, but it is still considered unproven because there's been no «smoking gun» evidence.

The Chancellor should appoint a Chief Scientific Adviser to develop the evidence - base and lead a debate about the future direction of the government's economic impact agenda prior to the next spending review.»

Faced with evidence of the complex impact of biomedicine on late 20th - century life, some bioethicists seem to prefer to celebrate scientific advances.

«Scientific evidence on the impacts of early childhood education has progressed well beyond exclusive reliance on the evaluations of the Perry Preschool and Abecedarian programs,» says Yoshikawa, the Courtney Sale Ross University Professor in NYU Steinhardt's Department of Applied Psychology and lead author of the brief.

«Although the impact of long - term use of e-cigarettes on health is still unknown,» the study stated, «the available scientific evidence indicates that e-cigarettes are less harmful than combustible cigarettes, and that smokers switching to e-cigarettes could benefit from a decrease in health risks related to smoking combustible cigarettes.»

Michael Mann added that «Donald Trump and his campaign still firmly reject the scientific evidence that climate change is human - caused, opposing the only action (a reduction of fossil fuel burning) that can save us from ever - more dangerous climate change impacts,» according to EcoWatch.

For instance, scientific evidence now indicates that optimal levels of folic acid, vitamin D, and even omega 3 fatty acids found in fish oil in you, the pre-pregnant woman, has impact on the health of your future kids.

Scientific evidence shows that moderate caffeine intake does not affect athletic performance (and can in fact slightly improve it), but alcohol consumption can interfere with muscle recovery from exercise, and negatively impact a number of other performance variables.

Scientific evidence shows that moderate caffeine intake does not affect athletic performance (and can in fact slightly improve it) or hydration status, but alcohol consumption can interfere with muscle recovery from exercise, and negatively impact a number of other performance variables.

Jack Shonkoff, director of the Center on the Developing Child and a professor at Harvard University, constantly explores the research and scientific evidence on children's «toxic stress response» and the impact this neurobiological system has on brain development and the development of disease years and decades later.

As students comb the Atlantic Coast for evidence of toxins in phytoplankton that poison clams, mussels, and oysters, their counterparts along the Pacific Coast count bottom fish such as halibut, sand dabs, and sole to help the scientific community determine whether pollution has a negative impact on these sea creatures» breeding habits.

Consider an education program so effective that its impact can be measured 19 years later, so well - studied that it can be backed up with decades of scientific evidence on children's improved skills in math and reading, and so impressive to policymakers that it continues to be championed around the country 40 years after its launch.

By distilling and organizing the existing research on cognitive science and educational psychology, the reports offer teacher candidates concise summaries of high - impact practices grounded in scientific evidence and professional consensus around PK - 12 learning.

It's no secret that pets make us happier and now a growing body of scientific evidence is revealing that pet ownership (or even just petting an animal for an extended period of time) has a significant impact on physical and mental health.

As the UK's Royal Society for the Protection of Birds notes, in refreshingly straightforward language: «Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK - wide... It is likely that most of the birds killed by cats would have died anyway from other causes before the next breeding season, so cats are unlikely to have a major impact on populations.»

«Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK - wide,» explains an article on the RSPB website.

How Obesity Impacts Animal Welfare Presented by Ernie Ward, DVM, Association for Pet Obesity Prevention Dr. Ward presents the latest scientific evidence on how obesity negatively affects quality - of - life in companion animals, discuss attitudes about pet nutrition, diet and weight loss, and offer strategies for weight loss and client communication tactics for a variety of commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

India About Blog MarksMan Healthcare Communications is a HEOR, Medical Writing, Scientific Outsourcing and Research Consulting committed in providing the highest level scientific evidence to optimise the value and health impact of medicines and health tecScientific Outsourcing and Research Consulting committed in providing the highest level scientific evidence to optimise the value and health impact of medicines and health tecscientific evidence to optimise the value and health impact of medicines and health technologies.

«We are excited to announce this upcoming funding for research surrounding our seven key topics, which to date have seen the most promising scientific evidence in terms of positive impacts of the bond, but could still benefit from a greater understanding,» Bob Vetere, president of HABRI, said.

While I appreciate your position and concerns, given the longevity of loot boxes as an in - game mechanic, there does not appear to be any concrete evidence of «gaming disorders» stemming from loot boxes nor am I aware of any scientific evidence indicating that unlocking loot boxes has any psychological impact on children more specifically.

Scientific evidence is springing up everywhere that indicates the massive and pernicious impacts of the human species on the finite resources of Earth, its frangible ecosystems and life as we know it.

Responding to the unequivocal scientific evidence that preventing the worst impacts of climate change will require Parties included in the Annex I to the Convention as a group to reduce emissions in a range of 25 ---- 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 and that global emissions of greenhouse gases need to peak in the next 10 to 15 years and be reduced to very low levels, well below half of levels in 2000 by 2050,

A group of scientists have called for the Obama Administration to place a moratorium on infamous mountain top mining due to «growing scientific evidence» of severe environmental degradation and serious impacts on human health, including cancer.

«The scientific evidence of the severe environmental and human impacts from mountaintop mining is strong and irrefutable,» lead author Dr. Margaret Palmer of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science says in a press release.

As EPA nears the release of its finalized hydraulic fracturing / water report, the weight of scientific study and analysis backs the agency's preliminary conclusion that there's no evidence that fracking has led to «widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States.»

All the case studies draw on observations of impacts that are consistent with, or attibutable to, human - induced climate change based on multiple lines of scientific evidence.

BBD - With all due respect, the study does nothing to explain how the scientific community has failed to come to grips with the fact that there is now pretty good evidence that we do not understand how the climate system works well enough to accurately determine the impact of additional atmospheric CO2.

Willfully disregarding scientific evidence about the impact of climate change undermines scientific authority and polarises public understandings.

To be clear, Donald Trump and his campaign still firmly rejects the scientific evidence that climate change is human - caused, opposing the only action (a reduction of fossil fuel burning) that can save us from ever - more dangerous climate change impacts.

More Scientific Evidence For CO2's Dubious Climate Impact Emerges Image Source: Robertson and Chilingar, 2017 According to the most basic precepts of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), variations in CO2 concentrations exert significant control on sea surface temperatures, glaciers, sea levels, and generalized climate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patterns).

NIPCC's conclusion, drawn from its extensive review of the scientific evidence, is that any human global climate impact is within the background variability of the natural climate system and is not dangerous.

The filmmaker looked for the scientific evidence behind the arguments of the climate sceptics, and compared these findings with the theories from scientists who have examined the impact of man on global warming.

With overwhelming scientific evidence of the increased rate and impact of climate change, it is [continue reading...]

However, I am rationally skeptical that AGW has had or will have any major impact on our climate (and, hence, of the CAGW premise as outlined by IPCC in its AR4 report), until empirical scientific evidence can be presented to show that this is, indeed, the case.

This impasse raises the prospect that in a year's time — even as the scientific evidence mounts that human impact on the climate system is veering out of control — there will be no internationally agreed legally binding commitments regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

They provide scientific evidence to support the call by vulnerable countries, such as the Least Developed Countries and Small Island Developing States, that a 1.5 C warming limit would substantially reduce the impacts of climate change.»

According to Jim Cripwell and others (whose scientific qualifications I am unqualified to evaluate) there is no empirical evidence that shows that the impact of anthropogenic CO2 is other than zero.

My problem is that I apparently can not distinguish how my paraphrase: «According to Jim Cripwell and others (whose scientific qualifications I am unqualified to evaluate) there is no empirical evidence that shows that the impact of anthropogenic CO2 is other than zero.»

In combination, these two research efforts add to the massive amount of scientific evidence that climate change is always occurring; and, most definitely does not require human consumer / industrial greenhouse gases to produce significant impacts on planetary environments and those associated civilizations.

With the scientific evidence growing ever more incontrovertible, and the impacts of warming becoming increasingly visible, it's possible that more and more Americans will slosh towards «concerned» — and stay there.

As a candidate and as President, Donald Trump has rejected clear scientific evidence that climate change poses a serious global threat, and has populated his cabinet with those who deny that fossil fuel emissions currently are the primary driver of climate change, and reject imperatives to cut carbon emissions and prepare for dangerous climate change impacts happening now.

Scientific groups have issued numerous statements supporting the consensus, and numerous surveys (including one released this week) continue to show that over 95 percent of those working in the field see evidence of an anthropogenic impact on climate.

(01/07/2010) A group of scientists have called for the Obama Administration to place a moratorium on infamous mountain top mining due to «growing scientific evidence» of severe environmental degradation and serious impacts on human health, including cancer.

The evidence for this is in precisely what happens in venues like E&E that have effectively dispensed with substantive peer review for any papers that follow the editor's political line — you end up with a backwater of poorly presented and incoherent contributions that make no impact on the mainstream scientific literature or conversation.