The scientific focus of our group is at the crossroads of Immunology, Inflammation, Vascular Medicine and Metabolism; we try to merge Basic Science and Translational Medicine by engaging preclinical translational animal models.
Not exact matches
Prior to Sucampo, he served as Chief
Scientific Officer
of Ambrx Inc., a clinical - stage biopharmaceutical company
focused on the development
of antibody - drug conjugates (ADCs) that was acquired by a consortium led by Fosun Pharmaceutical
Group in 2015.
At New Legacy, language arts and social studies are combined into integrated theme - based humanities courses; math is taught in a blended environment that enables teachers to effectively support and challenge a diverse
group of learners; and science is taught in six - week modules that
focus on
scientific inquiry and the
scientific process.
Article 15
Focus Groups and Analysis A body
of knowledge on the meaning
of the right to benefit from
scientific progress across disciplines.
Over the course
of 18 months, the Coalition conducted 17
focus groups, involving 145 participants from a diversity
of scientific and engineering disciplines (Protocol: Appendix C).
An initial
focus group study that engaged U.S. - based scientists added clarity regarding the broad benefits
of scientific progress relevant to the right and gave rise to a new conceptual framework for considering «access to science» in the context
of Article 15.
Moreover, as the various S&E constituencies — disciplinary societies, government agencies, industry
groups, and general
scientific societies — develop training plans and programs
of their own, they tend to
focus on narrowly defined interests.
And even if Dominique had gotten a position in a different work
group because
of her different
scientific focus, people would have said in secret that it was only to support me.
Scientific American worked with several proprietary research companies, in addition to leveraging its own 16,000 + audience panel, and conducted
focus groups of readers and potential readers.
Until recently, Zerhouni has emphasized
scientific «stars» — but in this latest desk - to - desk letter, he
focused on the lower tier
of emerging biomedical scientists, beyond the elite
group whose success is inevitable.
AAAS has held 17
focus groups since 2010 involving 145 U.S. participants representing a broad range
of scientific disciplines.
In a recent study appearing in Nature Publishing
Group's
Scientific Reports, the researchers
focused on the properties
of schreibersite and conducted experiments with the mineral to better understand how — in a chemical reaction with the corrosive effects
of water called «phosphorylation» — schreibersite could have provided the phosphate important to the emergence
of early biological life.
Within the work
groups focusing on different types
of disorders, members have faced
scientific dilemmas and — in some cases — pressure from patient
groups.
If making molecular movies comes across as ambitious, so will the aims
of the
Scientific Databases and Visualization group, headed by Dr. Isabel Rojas, which focuses on building scientific databases to organise biolog
Scientific Databases and Visualization
group, headed by Dr. Isabel Rojas, which
focuses on building
scientific databases to organise biolog
scientific databases to organise biological data.
To gain deeper insight into how Americans develop perspectives on the morality
of scientific breakthroughs, Pew conducted a series
of focus groups that drew from the same nationally representative sample as the survey.
The subjects
of this presentation are Working
Groups, which are assemblages
of 10 - 14 researchers who
focus on major well - defined
scientific questions at the interface between biology and mathematics.
Work in this Working
Group is conducted in close collaboration with other
scientific bodies (IRDiRC, ICORD) and institutions (RD at NCATS, UDP at NIH, ISS) active in the field
of Rare Diseases and
focuses on:
One
of the most promising fields
of early stage cancer research, still only undertaken by a few
scientific groups, is
focused on interfering in telomere lengthening.
Her fourth project is conducting a series
of focus groups titled «The Right to Enjoy the Benefits
of Scientific Progress» and is based on the «Universal Declaration
of Human Rights» drafted by Eleanor Roosevelt and adopted by the United Nations in 1948.
He was one
of three co-chairs
of the National Cancer Institute's Translational Research Working
Group, which worked to reengineer translational cancer science across the nation, and has been a member
of the
scientific advisory boards of several companies focused on the development of new technologies and treatments for human cancer, a member of the American Association of Cancer Research's Board of Directors, President of the National Coalition for Cancer Research, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Prostate Cancer F
scientific advisory boards
of several companies
focused on the development
of new technologies and treatments for human cancer, a member
of the American Association
of Cancer Research's Board
of Directors, President
of the National Coalition for Cancer Research, and a member
of the
Scientific Advisory Board of the Prostate Cancer F
Scientific Advisory Board
of the Prostate Cancer Foundation.
Year in Review: Calico and the Buck Institute Are Collaborating on Research into Aging and Potential Therapeutics for Age - related Diseases Top Grant from the NIH Faculty Awards Published Research Buck Faculty Share Their Expertise Worldwide Buck Labs
Focus on mTOR Pathway Live Longer, Live Well — New Donor
Groups Get Behind the Buck's Mission Full STEAM Ahead: Unique Partnership Helps Marin and Sonoma Schools Meet New Science Standards Energy and Climate Change Visionary Jostein Eikeland Pledges $ 5 Million to the Buck
Scientific Advisory Board Board
of Trustees Financial Summary Buck Advisory Council Cumulative Donors and Sponsors Honor Roll
of Donors
It is a three quarter activity in which small
groups of students conduct
focused, interdisciplinary research on the
scientific, management, and policy dimensions
of a specific environmental issue.
Which is why my comments and conclusions are typically based on
scientific papers, and reason plus personal experience in the field
of «communications, human resources / training, multinational corporate executive and marketing (including surveys,
focus groups and supervising production
of TV advertisements)».
This is undoubtedly one reason hundreds
of scientists,
scientific groups including the National Academies, and even media, including the magazines Seed and Popular Science, have signed on to a campaign seeking a presidential debate this year
focused on science.
The
focus of the SPXXL
group is on large - scale
scientific / technical computing using IBM hardware.
As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible
scientific skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit
of responsible
scientific skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies about mainstream climate
scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b)
focusing on unknowns about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front
groups and Astroturf
groups that hide the real parties in interest behind claims, (d) making specious claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding claims about climate change by holding conferences in which claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to
scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.
The Cooler Heads Coalition, also known as GlobalWarming.org, is formerly a sub-
group of the National Consumer Coalition, but now run as an «informal and ad - hoc
group focused on dispelling the myths
of global warming by exposing flawed economic,
scientific, and risk analysis.»
In a letter addressed to senior IPCC chairs dated 17th April, Prof Robert Stavins - a lead author for the IPCC's Working
Group 3
focusing on climate mitigation - complained
of his «frustration» that the government approval process «built political credibility by sacrificing
scientific integrity.»
Previously private email exchanges among top IPCC climatologists reveal an entrenched
group of activists
focused less on reaching an objective
scientific conclusion than on achieving their desired outcome.
His research
focuses on the intersection
of science communication and the politics
of scientific issues, especially energy and climate change, and aims to both broaden citizen participation in
scientific issues such as energy and improve the work
of groups already active in movements toward a clean energy economy.
Castelldefels, Spain About Blog The Gender and ICT research
group (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya — IN3) analyses the gender relations involved in the design, development and use
of scientific and technological innovations, with a particular
focus on ICT and STEM.
Castelldefels, Spain About Blog The Gender and ICT research
group (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya — IN3) analyses the gender relations involved in the design, development and use
of scientific and technological innovations, with a particular
focus on ICT and STEM.
Naming the Shadows is the first book to offer practitioners and students - in - training an in - depth exploration
of a trauma -
focused approach to individual and
group psychotherapy that respects
scientific rules
of evidence and at the same time attempts to honor the complexity and subjectivity
of an individual survivor's experience.