Sentences with phrase «scientific focus of our group»

The scientific focus of our group is at the crossroads of Immunology, Inflammation, Vascular Medicine and Metabolism; we try to merge Basic Science and Translational Medicine by engaging preclinical translational animal models.

Not exact matches

Prior to Sucampo, he served as Chief Scientific Officer of Ambrx Inc., a clinical - stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of antibody - drug conjugates (ADCs) that was acquired by a consortium led by Fosun Pharmaceutical Group in 2015.
At New Legacy, language arts and social studies are combined into integrated theme - based humanities courses; math is taught in a blended environment that enables teachers to effectively support and challenge a diverse group of learners; and science is taught in six - week modules that focus on scientific inquiry and the scientific process.
Article 15 Focus Groups and Analysis A body of knowledge on the meaning of the right to benefit from scientific progress across disciplines.
Over the course of 18 months, the Coalition conducted 17 focus groups, involving 145 participants from a diversity of scientific and engineering disciplines (Protocol: Appendix C).
An initial focus group study that engaged U.S. - based scientists added clarity regarding the broad benefits of scientific progress relevant to the right and gave rise to a new conceptual framework for considering «access to science» in the context of Article 15.
Moreover, as the various S&E constituencies — disciplinary societies, government agencies, industry groups, and general scientific societies — develop training plans and programs of their own, they tend to focus on narrowly defined interests.
And even if Dominique had gotten a position in a different work group because of her different scientific focus, people would have said in secret that it was only to support me.
Scientific American worked with several proprietary research companies, in addition to leveraging its own 16,000 + audience panel, and conducted focus groups of readers and potential readers.
Until recently, Zerhouni has emphasized scientific «stars» — but in this latest desk - to - desk letter, he focused on the lower tier of emerging biomedical scientists, beyond the elite group whose success is inevitable.
AAAS has held 17 focus groups since 2010 involving 145 U.S. participants representing a broad range of scientific disciplines.
In a recent study appearing in Nature Publishing Group's Scientific Reports, the researchers focused on the properties of schreibersite and conducted experiments with the mineral to better understand how — in a chemical reaction with the corrosive effects of water called «phosphorylation» — schreibersite could have provided the phosphate important to the emergence of early biological life.
Within the work groups focusing on different types of disorders, members have faced scientific dilemmas and — in some cases — pressure from patient groups.
If making molecular movies comes across as ambitious, so will the aims of the Scientific Databases and Visualization group, headed by Dr. Isabel Rojas, which focuses on building scientific databases to organise biologScientific Databases and Visualization group, headed by Dr. Isabel Rojas, which focuses on building scientific databases to organise biologscientific databases to organise biological data.
To gain deeper insight into how Americans develop perspectives on the morality of scientific breakthroughs, Pew conducted a series of focus groups that drew from the same nationally representative sample as the survey.
The subjects of this presentation are Working Groups, which are assemblages of 10 - 14 researchers who focus on major well - defined scientific questions at the interface between biology and mathematics.
Work in this Working Group is conducted in close collaboration with other scientific bodies (IRDiRC, ICORD) and institutions (RD at NCATS, UDP at NIH, ISS) active in the field of Rare Diseases and focuses on:
One of the most promising fields of early stage cancer research, still only undertaken by a few scientific groups, is focused on interfering in telomere lengthening.
Her fourth project is conducting a series of focus groups titled «The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress» and is based on the «Universal Declaration of Human Rights» drafted by Eleanor Roosevelt and adopted by the United Nations in 1948.
He was one of three co-chairs of the National Cancer Institute's Translational Research Working Group, which worked to reengineer translational cancer science across the nation, and has been a member of the scientific advisory boards of several companies focused on the development of new technologies and treatments for human cancer, a member of the American Association of Cancer Research's Board of Directors, President of the National Coalition for Cancer Research, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Prostate Cancer Fscientific advisory boards of several companies focused on the development of new technologies and treatments for human cancer, a member of the American Association of Cancer Research's Board of Directors, President of the National Coalition for Cancer Research, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Prostate Cancer FScientific Advisory Board of the Prostate Cancer Foundation.
Year in Review: Calico and the Buck Institute Are Collaborating on Research into Aging and Potential Therapeutics for Age - related Diseases Top Grant from the NIH Faculty Awards Published Research Buck Faculty Share Their Expertise Worldwide Buck Labs Focus on mTOR Pathway Live Longer, Live Well — New Donor Groups Get Behind the Buck's Mission Full STEAM Ahead: Unique Partnership Helps Marin and Sonoma Schools Meet New Science Standards Energy and Climate Change Visionary Jostein Eikeland Pledges $ 5 Million to the Buck Scientific Advisory Board Board of Trustees Financial Summary Buck Advisory Council Cumulative Donors and Sponsors Honor Roll of Donors
It is a three quarter activity in which small groups of students conduct focused, interdisciplinary research on the scientific, management, and policy dimensions of a specific environmental issue.
Which is why my comments and conclusions are typically based on scientific papers, and reason plus personal experience in the field of «communications, human resources / training, multinational corporate executive and marketing (including surveys, focus groups and supervising production of TV advertisements)».
This is undoubtedly one reason hundreds of scientists, scientific groups including the National Academies, and even media, including the magazines Seed and Popular Science, have signed on to a campaign seeking a presidential debate this year focused on science.
The focus of the SPXXL group is on large - scale scientific / technical computing using IBM hardware.
As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible scientific skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit of responsible scientific skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies about mainstream climate scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b) focusing on unknowns about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front groups and Astroturf groups that hide the real parties in interest behind claims, (d) making specious claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding claims about climate change by holding conferences in which claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.
The Cooler Heads Coalition, also known as GlobalWarming.org, is formerly a sub-group of the National Consumer Coalition, but now run as an «informal and ad - hoc group focused on dispelling the myths of global warming by exposing flawed economic, scientific, and risk analysis.»
In a letter addressed to senior IPCC chairs dated 17th April, Prof Robert Stavins - a lead author for the IPCC's Working Group 3 focusing on climate mitigation - complained of his «frustration» that the government approval process «built political credibility by sacrificing scientific integrity.»
Previously private email exchanges among top IPCC climatologists reveal an entrenched group of activists focused less on reaching an objective scientific conclusion than on achieving their desired outcome.
His research focuses on the intersection of science communication and the politics of scientific issues, especially energy and climate change, and aims to both broaden citizen participation in scientific issues such as energy and improve the work of groups already active in movements toward a clean energy economy.
Castelldefels, Spain About Blog The Gender and ICT research group (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya — IN3) analyses the gender relations involved in the design, development and use of scientific and technological innovations, with a particular focus on ICT and STEM.
Castelldefels, Spain About Blog The Gender and ICT research group (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya — IN3) analyses the gender relations involved in the design, development and use of scientific and technological innovations, with a particular focus on ICT and STEM.
Naming the Shadows is the first book to offer practitioners and students - in - training an in - depth exploration of a trauma - focused approach to individual and group psychotherapy that respects scientific rules of evidence and at the same time attempts to honor the complexity and subjectivity of an individual survivor's experience.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z