He also discouraged a «version
of a Christianity» that is «a
house of cards» that falls apart if we find out that certain possible historic or
scientific details
of the Bible are inaccurate or that there are apparent contradictions.
In contrast to Dr. Happer's view that the science
of climate change is like a
house of cards (i.e., find one flaw and the whole sense
of understanding will fall), I have tried to give a sense
of why, as Professor Henry Pollack
of the University
of Michigan has put it, the science
of climate change is like a rope hammock (i.e., with lots
of interconnections and linkages, such that weaknesses or failure
of any particular detailed finding does not weaken the overall strength
of scientific understanding).