Not exact matches
First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of
place in a high - school science classroom because most scientists working
in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and because understanding the
scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.
First because Dr T derives any authority he has from his
place in the
scientific community, and second because unpicking the methodological
issues exposes the political.
In the
first place, you and I are not a community on this
issue, and to the best of my knowledge you are not a qualified climate scientist, or indeed even a name that might make Inhofe's list of pretenders to
scientific authority.
According to research by Yale Law School professor Dan Kahan and his colleagues, people's deep - seated views about morality, and about the way society should be ordered, strongly predict whom they consider to be a legitimate
scientific expert
in the
first place — and thus where they consider «
scientific consensus» to lie on contested
issues.