The letter ends with a promise of collaboration, saying, «We in the scientific community are prepared to work with you on
the scientific issues important to your deliberations as you seek to address the challenges of our changing climate.»
Not exact matches
Additionally, at Oregon State University, the Research and Service Grant funds connect the craft brewing community with world - class research capabilities and enable Thomas H. Shellhammer, Ph.D., Nor» Wester professor of fermentation science,
to work on industry - relevant
scientific and technical
issues that not only advance science but answer
important and practical questions faced by craft brewers.
The
important distinction here is — are those on opposite sides of the
issue all willing
to pay attention
to scientific evidence.
The letter acknowledged the Twitter response CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald
issued Sunday, assuring the public that CDC has not banned any words and will continue
to base its «
important public health programs» on
scientific facts.
Science covers news in all areas of science, from geology
to genetics, as well as science policy and
issues important to the
scientific community, such as science, technology, engineering, and math education and sexual harassment.
But Voinnet, Baulcombe writes, also showed «hard work and [the] ability
to focus on the
important scientific issues to the exclusion of everything else, including the real world.»
With this
issue in mind, a team of American researchers reviewed the available
scientific literature and suggested four
important considerations
to maximize the clinical impact of future research regarding adolescent depression symptoms and substance use.
«From a public health perspective, even a weak effect of temperature on health constitutes an
important problem due
to ubiquity of exposure,» Manuela De Sario and Paola Michelozzi, both of the Lazio Region Department of Epidemiology in Rome and co-authors of an editorial that appears in the same
issue of the BMJ, explained in an e-mail
to Scientific American.
«The
important issue is that scientists and students have access
to such courses,» remarks Mark S. Frankel, director of
Scientific Freedom, Responsibility, and Law Program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (publisher of Science's Next Wave).
«Given the neglect, distrust, denial and manipulation of evidence today, it is more
important than ever that reporters have the best available
scientific evidence — provided with clarity and context —
to inform the public about
issues so very relevant
to their lives,» said Rush Holt, chief executive officer at AAAS.
«We are not looking for them
to comment on the
scientific reliability of the paper or its originality or importance
to clinicians, but
to tell us if the research question addresses an
issue which is
important to them as patients.»
The result is that Canadians — and the rest of the world — have been denied the chance
to hear from some of the most authoritative
scientific voices on
important issues ranging from the Arctic ozone hole
to radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi reactor accident in Japan, and even the effect of aquaculture on wild salmon.
Linda Geddes's sobering report about the reliability of forensic evidence highlights an
important scientific issue: the need
to establish error...
«Beyond the
important scientific advancements we will make, I am very excited about training the next generation of scientists who will continue tackling these
issues over the next 30
to 40 years,» said Clark.
Said Fred Kavli, chairman and founder of The Kavli Foundation: «It is my hope that the Kavli Prize Science Forum provides a valuable and continuing opportunity for scientists and policymakers
to engage on
issues important to scientific research.
The ceremony is part of Kavli Prize Week - a week of special programs that celebrate extraordinary achievements in science, educate the public on
important scientific advances, and bring together distinguished members of the international community
to discuss key global
issues in science and science policy.
The primary objective of the RME course is
to provide a state - of - the - art review of various aspects of regenerative medicine including background material, the key
scientific components of the field of regenerative medicine, ethical, economic and
issues important to regenerative medicine as well as an opportunity
to network and meet leading professionals in the field.
«Crick had a superb intellect which he brought
to bear on a number of very
important scientific issues.
As part of the project requirements, preservice teachers designed their lesson
to (a) delve deeply into an
important scientific topic (lasting from one
to five class periods), (b) help their students answer an
important research question, and (c) address a pressing societal
issue.
In addition, FEDIAF's
Scientific Advisory Board has
issued a statement on nutrition of senior dogs - with a view
to extended life expectancy of pets this statement was seen as
important to explain the nutritional requirements of senior dogs.
Their initial piece, «Climate change is real: an open letter from the
scientific community,» is on The Conversation, an academic Web site aiming
to provide a credible source of information and analysis on
important issues as traditional journalism shrinks.
I submit that your real mission is not
to provide more data for a (admittedly fascinating)
scientific study of pattern recognition, it's
to disseminate accurate information on one of the world's most
important scientific issues.
Important issues should be addressed with the scientific community as well as regular citizens because modern world is derailing man from its track and 33 % of obesity promising to reach 50 % by 2050 should be an important issue for dealing to learn on the best options to curb such
Important issues should be addressed with the
scientific community as well as regular citizens because modern world is derailing man from its track and 33 % of obesity promising
to reach 50 % by 2050 should be an
important issue for dealing to learn on the best options to curb such
important issue for dealing
to learn on the best options
to curb such dilemma.
It is
important to address this
issue of
scientific concensus and look at this analogy
to ulcers.
The findings of V+S represent an
important contribution
to the ongoing
scientific discourse on the
issue of climate change impacts on tropical cyclones, and the study should spur additional work looking at the complicated
issues involved in greater detail.
(«You need
to continue
to make the lack of
scientific certainty a primary
issue in the debate...») The unlikely chain from Luntz
to Obama included two
important links, E.D.F. President Fred Krupp and Senator Lindsey Graham.
I see this as a gap given that some of the most
important issues related
to the past performance of the climate panel and its utility going forward concern the interface between its
scientific assessments, the governments that have final say over the reports and the wider audience.
I think the thread does reinforce my earlier expressed view that a careful discussion of the
issues related
to the
scientific method separate from the politics is
important.
Dear Don, your post was really informative and this is very interesting and most sensitive
issue in the present world.climate ethics are most
important for everyone.because these are an
important role in climate changes.i agree with your argument, i think
scientific measures must have been taken by the government in order
to successful implementation of the climate ethics.
Function: Chapter Lead Authors are responsible for ensuring their chapters provide an organized overview of the
important scientific, technical, economic, and social
issues regarding climate change, assessing each
issue with
scientific objectivity and attention
to all relevant evidence.
Science historians would point out that Professor Revelle did not prompt the first CO2 measurement in the atmosphere; what he prompted was the first sampling of air from locations around the world, and it was actually Harry Wexler, the head of the Weather Service at the time, who prompted and actually funded the start of the long - term monitoring program by David Keeling on Mauna Loa — so Revelle did play a very
important role in stimulating observations (and in 1965 he chaired the panel on this
issue that prepared a quite insightful appendix for the report of the President's
Scientific Advisory Council), but Revelle was not the very first
to urge CO2 be measured in the atmosphere.
But even with the «environmental» groups» strong influence, the Obama Administration may not have trusted the SAB
to render the invalid
scientific conclusions on climate alarmism they wanted in their Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and failed
to submit their GHG Endangerment Finding
to the SAB for review despite the clear need for it
to do so on such an
important and influential
issue.
I'm surprised that you're not willing
to discuss this
issue since it formed an
important part of your narrative that the politics was driving
scientific statements in IPCC reports.
Two days ago, I wrote that for me the real
issue in the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial is not so much my own personal freedom of speech but the broader freedom
to speak given «the climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs of alarmism have succeeded in imposing on an
important scientific field»:
The ability of our society and public officials
to make good decisions about
important issues depends on a free, honest, and accurate flow of
scientific research and findings.
Climate Change Reconsidered is an immensely
important contribution
to genuine
scientific debate on
issues where unscientific fear - mongering has thus far triumphed.
I would have expected a
scientific journal
to have more backbone, certainly when it comes
to the crucially
important issue of academic freedom.
This means that it must be accurate and convey the
important information, but it can not contain all of the
scientific detail, which would obfuscate
to issue (disinformation).
Of course papers are
important for the
scientific record, but if the main temperature record providers update their work in response
to the
issues we raise it'll be recorded in their publications.
In addition,
important scientific research is ongoing as there are still many questions that must be answered before we take steps
to address this
issue.
«From my point of view, the most
important issue is whether anything has been added
to or subtracted from the
scientific picture of global warming that's emerged gradually over several decades of careful analysis by thousands of experts.
Climate change is a
scientific issue — it's all about physics, and if we just explain the facts
to people, they'll understand it is
important and take action, right?
Therefore, there is a different and
important answer
to the
issue raised here: that Dyson is not only pro-humanistic because people are part of nature, but that he also grasps that ecology is a field of
scientific limitations (for example, see R. H. Peters, «A Critique For Ecology»), he rejects its religious rationalizations and rationalizers.
Scientific uncertainty and disagreement, along with other factors such as the complexity of the
issues, inefficient decision - making processes, and the influence of industry stakeholders, combine
to delay
important agency decisions.