Not exact matches
The infamous atheist and
scientific expert was prompted to campaign on the
issue after the
case against Simon Singh, an author being sued by the British Chiropractic Association for an article questioning the use
of chiropractic techniques in childhood illness.
The Program
issued urgent appeals on the AAASHRAN about Erkel's kidnapping and urged members
of the
scientific community to pressure the government to investigate the
case, ensure Erkel's safety and to hold those responsible accountable.
Civil war has nearly broken out among neuropsychologists over this
issue, so let me tread lightly here — I will simply say that I have seen no
scientific evidence for how such recovered memories might work, no supposed
cases of it documented to be legitimate in a way that should satisfy a rigorous scientist, and plenty
of scientific explanations for why various claims have not been legitimate.
SCIENTIFIC WORKFORCE: Report to Argue for More Training Funds Although many groups have tried to make the
case that the supply
of scientists is not keeping up with demand, the members
of the National Science Board's Task Force on National Workforce Policies have taken a different approach to the
issue.
«It is our belief that, in
cases involving
scientific evidence, the pre-trial phase should be used to sort out and define as many
scientific issues as possible and to consider... the best means
of resolving (for example, by further
scientific tests) any matters that may be disputed.»
In that
case, the controversy revolved around
scientific issues, not disclosure
of funding sources.
The National Academies, fulfilling a congressional request, have
issued a trio
of invaluable reports affirming the
scientific case for a growing and largely harmful human influence on climate; proposing a path and strategies for curbing American emissions
of heat - trapping gases; and urging the country to work to cut risks attending life with no new «normal» climate patterns or coastlines.
Climate change skeptics often highlight certain
scientific results as a means
of confusing this
issue, and that appears to be the
case with Mr. Gunter's description
of our recent results based on data from Argo buoys.
In this day and age, we lay - people are constantly bombarded by misinformation and in some
cases disinformation concerning the top
scientific issues of our time.
The conclusion appears to be to abandon seeking where the center and range
of scientific opinion is on this uncertain
issue, and just have some kind
of «open debate» whatever that means without quantifying uncertainty ranges, worst
case and best
case scenarios, etc..
I've worked with ministers and prime ministers from both parties over a long period
of time, and in all
cases I think I've tried to draw a line between fearless
scientific advice about
issues and actual policy development, which I think is in the realm
of government,» he said.
Scientific questions are questions
of facts and judges are supposed to restrict their rulings to
issues of law, except in those relatively few
cases where the parties have asked the court to determine questions
of fact.
Though this may be an appropriate tool in some
cases, its usefulness to the job
of shedding light on what people think about complex political and
scientific issues is debateable, and may in fact reveal more about Lewandowsky than sceptics.
Now, because
of posts like this, I predict that you and a few dozen others will go down in
scientific history on this topic, relative to defense
of scientific integrity and freedom on an
issue that spent the better part
of a generation devolving to the point where RICO
cases are suggested against dissenting scientists and corporations and «skeptics» are obliquely likened to Holocaust «deniers».
The
issue in the Mann
case is the allegation
of scientific fraud.
In this
case the main ethical
issue of concern has not been the
scientific integrity but the influence
of the results
of research on society.
Then again, the Post generally corrects errors
of scientific fact or misrepresentations
of scientists» views, as in the
case of Nigel Weiss, only after the offended scientist
issues a libel notice.
I don't know what the particular
scientific issues in this
case were, and I have areas
of disagreement with Dr. Ball.
While I hope this is not the
case (for the sake
of climatology going forward beyond the current cult
of global warming) you are to be lauded as one
of the few voices with the courage to treat this a
scientific issue rather than a political one.
Integrity is an
issue of particular importance at the science - policy interface, particularly when the
scientific case is represented by a consensus that is largely based on expert opinion.
Topic:
Case Studies
of Important
Scientific and Technological
Issues The Nature and Development
of Science and Technology Global Warming.
which was published in the April 16, 2007
issue of Newsweek and distributed by MSNBC, includes roughly a score
of statements that are contrary to the international
scientific consensus and, in many
cases, quite misleading.
Lindzen's reaction appears to be to dig in his heels and try to make the
issue even more political (or religous in this
case) however he better watch out because he has an awful lot
of dirty
scientific laundry out there in the literature.
W's administration knew they couldn't win this
case, the ESA is unambiguous regarding listing once the professional staff
of USF&W
issues its
scientific finding
of the status
of the species in question.
This paper is a great
case study
of the
issue I've been working through recently — how might the mainstream media most usefully report on these sorts
of scientific controversies?
@John Coochey You can prove that Monckton has a
case by presenting a list
of his most central claims that bring down the foundations
of climate science as it concerns the specific
issue of enhanced greenhouse effect due to fossil fuel greenhouse gas emissions, and an accompanying list
of evidence directly relevant to these central claims, and an accompanying logical argument based upon the current state
of scientific knowledge.
But critics say that the report in some
cases overstated the level
of scientific certainty on the
issue or simply got things wrong.
[13] On the second
issue, the
case management judge concluded that the
issues would require a prolonged examination
of documents and a
scientific examination within the meaning
of the sub-rule, but rejected the argument that the examination
of these documents and expert reports could not be made conveniently with a jury.
At Conroy Simberg we know that a successful mass tort defense requires an in - depth understanding
of the complex legal and technical
issues involved in the
case, as well as access to knowledgeable medical and
scientific experts.
Though most
of his
cases involve complex
scientific issues, Larkin enjoys the challenge
of condensing the technical
issues in a
case and presenting them to judge and jury in a simple, direct, and forceful manner.
The extent
of our product liability experience is most evident in the courtroom, where our lawyers have a long track record
of winning high - profile product liability
cases involving complex technical,
scientific and medical
issues.
An influx
of patent
cases to any given jurisdiction offers a new opportunity for local attorneys, yet patent litigation often involves complex
scientific issues that are new to many courts.
In fact, Omnity includes free access to a variety
of legal resources, including
issued and pending patents, U.S.
case law, SEC filings, technical and
scientific articles, and more.
His practice involves litigation
of complex business
cases, including those involving intellectual property, oil and gas, environmental
issues, business disputes, insurance law, and other
cases involving technical and
scientific issues.
For the past several years, he has focused on the development and presentation at trial
of scientific issues in pharmaceutical product liability
cases.
A successful defense in these types
of cases requires seasoned attorneys with a keen understanding
of the complex legal and medical
issues involved in asbestos litigation, as well as access to skilled medical and
scientific experts capable
of thoroughly investigating and analyzing claims.
In addition to organized seminars, Mr. Dye has sought out additional educational materials in the fields
of toxicology, gas chromatography, infrared spectroscopy and other
issues related to
scientific evidence in DUI
cases.
[9] I find that the
issues in this
case raise a level
of technical and
scientific knowledge beyond what can reasonably be expected
of counsel generally.
In their submission to Supreme Court
case addressing
issues of causation and Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal jurisdiction, IAVGO and ONIWG argue that
scientific certainty is not required (and in fact definitive
scientific evidence on work - related causation rarely exists).
Provided that in any other civil action, expert witness is defined as one who has
scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge which may assist the trier
of fact in understanding evidence and determining a fact or
issue in the
case.
We have enjoyed great victories framing
scientific issues and positioning
cases successfully for Daubert and analogous state - court challenges, often leading to summary judgment
of hundreds
of cases in favor
of our clients.
Understanding
of medical,
scientific, construction, products, engineering and similar
issues inherent in workers compensation
cases
Many
of her
cases have involved technical and
scientific issues.