Not exact matches
@geraldh — believers have always injected god to fill the
gaps in
scientific knowledge.
The benefit of this approach is that God is not consigned to the
gaps in
scientific knowledge.
As science learns more and more about how the Universe works, the ignorance
gaps in our
scientific knowledge become smaller and smaller... the same with your man made god named Jehovah.
Science is constantly in motion as we strive to fill the
gaps in our
knowledge and understanding, and the
scientific method leaves nothing off the chopping block for further refinement and alteration to fit the mounting evidence about how the world works around us.
I don't have to prove
scientific mythology because it's what science does, it fills in the
gaps of
knowledge.
• «the God for which we are arguing is not a God of the
gaps, not a God who is brought in to paste over the
gaps in our present
scientific knowledge, which might be filled later as science progresses.
Only the ones who think stupid things, like the
gaps in
scientific knowledge somehow proves God, are.
He inserts his beliefs into the
gaps of
scientific knowledge, and expects his
scientific credentials to convince others of his position.
A robust physician - scientist workforce is key to bridging the
gap between
scientific knowledge and medical practice.
Another possibility is that the relative calm is simply an information
gap, a lack of
knowledge among the international
scientific community about the country's geological history.
Gaps in the road to
scientific knowledge are not potholes to be avoided, but opportunities to be exploited.
But when it comes to explaining the Cambrian explosion, Darwin's Doubt is compromised by Meyer's lack of
scientific knowledge, his «god of the
gaps» approach, and selective scholarship that appears driven by his deep belief in an explicit role of an intelligent designer in the history of life.
The new statement reviews current
scientific evidence, points out
gaps in
knowledge and discusses the need for more research in women, said Dr. Laxmi Mehta.
To this end, the Center has developed a three - stage
knowledge transfer process: (1) Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person prese
knowledge transfer process: (1)
Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person prese
Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the
scientific community; (2)
Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person prese
Knowledge Translation — the identification of
gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate
scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3)
Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person prese
Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person presentations.
My hypothesis is that it will be beneficial to plan our STEM strategy and scope and sequence around
gaps in
scientific knowledge and understanding identified by PATS.
This 2006 workshop reviewed the current state of
knowledge, identified
gaps in
scientific knowledge and prioritized research, recommending leveraging current and future research, and development of impact metrics for evaluating impacts and trade - off options.
Employing a methodology similar to the field note — the notes detailing events leading up to the biological specimens» collection and inform its final classification — these three artists question perception's role in
knowledge production; they examine the
gap between rational
scientific systems and human idiosyncrasies.
When I say I have not found something, it is not for lack of effort, and I would like to have the specific
gaps in my
knowledge filled in with detailed, published
scientific articles and books.
The
gaps between
scientific knowledge, media coverage, and public
knowledge (and wise action) boggle the mind.
One chapter is dedicated to each indicator, describing the measurement units, relevance,
scientific basis, methodological approach, anticipated limitations, data requirements,
knowledge gaps, relevant international processes, and references.
Requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish the National Climate Change Wildlife Science Center within USGS to: (1) assess current physical and biological
knowledge and prioritize
scientific gaps in such
knowledge to forecast the ecological impacts of climate change on fish and wildlife at the ecosystem, habitat, community, population, and species levels; (2) develop and improve tools to identify, evaluate, and link
scientific approaches and models for forecasting impacts of climate change; (3) develop and evaluate tools to adaptively manage and monitor climate change impacts; and (4) develop capacities for sharing such data.
You take away the wonder of science if you say emphatically that people are wrong and you are right when the
scientific evidence is based on models, and theories with huge
gaps in the
knowledge.
This report, requested by Congress, reviews the current state of
knowledge and identifies
gaps in understanding, and provides
scientific advice to help guide the national ocean acidification research program.
Once a
scientific «paradigm» has become what Kuhn calls «normal science», most science work involves «filling in the small
gaps» of
knowledge, using the «normal paradigm» as the template.
[25] However, a discussion of these large
gaps in
scientific knowledge is largely missing in the media and policy arena.
In particular, transboundary
scientific cooperation is needed to accurately assess regional climate change impacts on Himalayan glaciers and to fill
knowledge gaps by providing
scientific findings to the policy community based on the best
scientific understanding of the issues (48, 44, 45).
Scientific agencies, like CIFOR and many others, are working hard to reduce the technical barriers and fill
knowledge gaps on all fronts to support positive actions to reduce emissions.
The authors tout as a hopeful example the International Soil Carbon Network, a
scientific initiative designed to pool data and identify
gaps in monitoring and
knowledge.
When a consensus, true or false, emerges in a
scientific discipline, it is not sufficient for critics to point out uncertainties and
gaps in
knowledge, such as always exist in science, for example Darwinian evolution or plate tectonics.
«We are witnessing alarming rates of species extinction,» said iBOL
Scientific Director Paul Hebert, «but efforts to reverse that trend are hampered by huge
gaps in our
knowledge about the distribution and diversity of life.