Sentences with phrase «scientific knowledge of these processes»

Is the current scientific knowledge of these processes well established enough to have the confidence for this company to carry this out appropriately and successfully?

Not exact matches

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

I do not mean that they had a knowledge of scientific evolution but that they looked upon reality as a process of growth.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

If this first step in human knowledge is fundamentally called into question then the scientist undermines the process of scientific enquiry and the theologian empties the significance of the Incarnation and the objectivity of all other concrete acts of God in history.

Our scientific expertise focuses on 3 major areas: the development of specific, often patented, industrial processes that account for the properties of each raw material; analytical research relying on specialized equipment and methods to standardize the various functionalities of our products; and finally, our formulation knowledge to adapt our ingredients to meet specific application requirements.

Knowledge co-production, also called «public participation in scientific research» or «citizen science,» provides «intentional collaborations in which members of the public engage in the process of research to generate new science - based knowledgKnowledge co-production, also called «public participation in scientific research» or «citizen science,» provides «intentional collaborations in which members of the public engage in the process of research to generate new science - based knowledgeknowledge.»

Eventually, they produced a three - dimensional image of a protein to reveal its working architecture, deepening scientific understanding of the processes at work — knowledge that has been used to develop pharmaceuticals.

If the growing awareness of an ongoing problem has led to more transparency, the scientific process, and the public who benefits from the knowledge it generates, will be better off.

I focus on three issues: (i) using the Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR) process to bridge SDGs and scientific communities, (ii) choosing targets, indicators, and roadmaps related to STI, and (iii) the imperative of building knowledge - based societies.

With this knowledge and the confirmation of the works of Lugassy and Barnhill on angiotropism and EVMM, the researchers in the scientific community can now begin looking for a drug target that will interfere with this EVMM process, with the hope of creating a treatment that would stop EVMM.

We need to emphasise why the scientific process is such a reliable generator of knowledge — with its respect for evidence, for scepticism, for consistency of approach, for the constant testing of ideas.

The committee that conducted the study and wrote the report said that science knowledge is only one component of science literacy, which also encompasses understanding scientific practices, such as forming and testing hypotheses, and understanding science as a social process, such as the role of peer review.

As the scientific knowledge of RNAi has expanded, a completely opposite process of RNA activation (RNAa) has been discovered.

The Subglacial Antarctic Lakes Scientific Access (SALSA) project aims to uncover new knowledge about this newly explored biome through an integrative study of subglacial geobiology, water column and sedimentary organic carbon, and geobiological processes in one of the largest subglacial lakes in West Antarctica.

Scientific knowledge input into process based models has much improved, reducing uncertainty of known science for some components of sea - level rise (e.g. steric changes), but when considering other components (e.g. ice melt from ice sheets, terrestrial water contribution) science is still emerging, and uncertainties remain high.

Our skills in data analysis are complemented by our knowledge of the scientific funding process from working in research organizations in the US, Canada, and Europe.

They are involved in developing new products and services as well as discovering and creating new knowledge about scientific and technological topics for the purpose of uncovering and enabling development of valuable new products, processes, and services.

With these concepts in mind, the Center employs the following three - stage process: • Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community.

To this end, the Center has developed a three - stage knowledge transfer process: (1) Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person preseknowledge transfer process: (1) Knowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person preseKnowledge Synthesis — a critical analysis of cutting - edge science and program evaluation research to identify core concepts and evidence - based findings that are broadly accepted by the scientific community; (2) Knowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person preseKnowledge Translation — the identification of gaps in understanding between scientists and the public, and the development of effective language to communicate accurate scientific information in a way that can inform sound public discourse; and (3) Knowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person preseKnowledge Communication — the production and dissemination of a wide variety of publications and educational media via print, the Web, and in - person presentations.

This process begins with the production of an initial draft of a working paper about the developmental impacts of chronic neglect, including a neurobiological perspective on what happens to the brain when it receives limited or inappropriate stimulation, and a discussion of the relevance of this scientific knowledge for rethinking both policy and practice in child protective services.

Water was «read» by their mind, heart, sensorial attitude, into a valuable process of transdisciplinary knowledge.3 The visit to The Water Tower4 of the town and its museum facilitated the real knowledge of the objects and instruments that were used during the centuries by the rural and urban civilization concerning the use of water; the creative workshops facilitated unexpected «meetings» between poetry, music and painting in the artistic imaginary frame of water; the presentations revealed the magic powers of the water as they are known in folklore, mythology and also the astonishing Bible significations of the water and its use in religious rituals; the scientific outlook on water brought forward for discussion its physical - chemical properties, its role in the human metabolism and in all living beings.

That is why the field laboratories on biodiversity, have put on the table an issue that brings great knowledge to the training, not only for the scientific date are of great importance in research, but also as a process of awareness individually.

And in the process, Boser acknowledges one of the fundamental contradictions related to this accrued scientific knowledge of education and human development: At no other time have we known so much about human potential — the plasticity of the brain, the conditions that activate and stimulate human performance, and the ways technology can deliver knowledge and skills - training at a scale and efficiency that was unimaginable even a decade ago.

Hundreds of thousands of AP science students — and their teachers — are now expected to grapple with the inquiry process, real world applications of scientific principles, and synthesis of content knowledge at a higher level than ever before.

Situating science in society to help students learn to use their knowledge of scientific concepts and processes to make decisions, participate in civic and cultural affairs, and contribute to economic productivity

Standards of Learning assessments in English reading, mathematics, science and history / social science are made up of 35 - 50 items or questions that measure content knowledge, scientific and mathematical processes, reasoning and critical thinking skills.

Individual original research under the direction of faculty, aimed at acquisition of research skills, appreciation of the scientific inquiry process, knowledge of scientific writing style and dissemination.

Scientific process skills should be applied in the pursuit of scientific content Scientific process skills should be applied in the pursuit of scientific content scientific content knowledge.

A: A valid VCPR involves a scientific / biological examination process, knowledge of pharmacology and experienced professional judgment exercised by a duly licensed veterinarian in deciding if, when and how medications are utilized for an animal.

His vision as a sculptor is based on observation and experience both in terms of ideas; drawn upon his early scientific background and his extensive knowledge of the history of cultural evolution, together with his visual and tactile ability to respond to the forms in his sculptures while in the process of making them.

This event might signal a crack that allows for processes of re-structuring scientific knowledge about climate change.

Here I side strongly on the role of «The Honest Broker» for those who bring the scientific knowledge to the decision making process.

The process of disregarding the knowledge of a «scientific heavy hitter on the subject» takes approximately zero seconds and the primary justification for this specious disregard is a purely childish hostility to the phrasing of a simple undisputed fact.

An appropriate circulation process is to be engaged, involving circulation to independent experts not involved in the preparation of the chapter to be reviewed, chosen with reference only to the scientific knowledge and proven analytical ability of the experts in that issue area.

Better than most works on the subject, which tend to assume too much knowledge on the part of the reader, Steele's very readable book makes clear the workings of natural weather and climate processes, in turn making clear the extent to which global warming alarmism is based on opportunistic hype and the relentless pursuit of a political — not a scientific — agenda.

Beyond realizing the scientific objectives identified above, a natural outcome of this work will be to build a community of marine scientists who understand the processes regulating trace element cycles sufficiently well to exploit this knowledge reliably in future interdisciplinary studies.

Similarly, today natural climate - change is being blamed on human activity by politicians, rather than the scientific illiteracy that's CAUSED by the politicization of the scientific process as a tool for power rather than knowledge.

Of course, the Greens abhor empirical scientific methodology as a sexist rape of knowledge, but by appropriating the language of science to advance faith - based mythology they achieve two things: First, they appropriate the authority of science, which in the modern world is the official seal of all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirOf course, the Greens abhor empirical scientific methodology as a sexist rape of knowledge, but by appropriating the language of science to advance faith - based mythology they achieve two things: First, they appropriate the authority of science, which in the modern world is the official seal of all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof knowledge, but by appropriating the language of science to advance faith - based mythology they achieve two things: First, they appropriate the authority of science, which in the modern world is the official seal of all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof science to advance faith - based mythology they achieve two things: First, they appropriate the authority of science, which in the modern world is the official seal of all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof science, which in the modern world is the official seal of all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof all approved knowledge and secondly by debasing science in the service of myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof myth, the Greens vandalise the cognitive process of rational inquirof rational inquiry.

I did mention that imho mainstream media suffers from too much emphasis on news (as opposed to robust knowledge) and on mere facts (to the detriment of explaining the scientific process of getting to understand those facts).

Assuming that the aggregated scientific opinion is strongly dependent on the strength and direction of the available evidence (i.e. having trust in the scientific process), this should give a pretty good picture of the robustness of scientific knowledge.

The goal is end - to - end access and auditability of the scientific knowledge and processes which go into forming some set of intermediate and final conclusions about the earth's climate and where it might be headed.

The long process of merging scientific and community knowledge creates an integrated understanding that can produce an adaptation plan that is both informed by science and relevant to community members who will be implementing it.

Throughout its life, the USGCRP has created and maintained a mix of atmospheric, oceanic, land, and space - based observing systems; gained new theoretical knowledge of Earth System processes; advanced understanding of the complexity of the Earth System through predictive modeling; promoted advances in computational capabilities, data management, and information sharing; and developed and harnessed an expert scientific workforce.

I am developing an interdisciplinary model of the social production of scientific ignorance — the process whereby a coalition of agents from different social fields constructs a false scientific controversy at the public level in order to undermine authoritative scientific knowledge.

So Elaine McKewon believes that there is an ongoing process «whereby a coalition of agents from different social fields constructs a false scientific controversy at the public level in order to undermine authoritative scientific knowledge.»

Louis says: So Elaine McKewon believes that there is an ongoing process «whereby a coalition of agents from different social fields constructs a false scientific controversy at the public level in order to undermine authoritative scientific knowledge.»

«Draft reports are intermediate products and do not represent the scientific view that the IPCC provides on the state of knowledge of climate change and its potential environmental and socio - economic impacts at the conclusion of the process,» it added.

The IPCC consensus building process played a useful role in the early synthesis of the scientific knowledge.

He has an absence of the prerequisite sequential process steps that lead to understanding the proper concept of the null hypothesis in determining objective scientific knowledge.