Sentences with phrase «scientific knowledge regarding»

Knowing what I know about the socially mediated neurodevelopment of the brain during childhood and its implications for child and family therapy, I am strongly of the opinion that we should require that all mental health professionals who are diagnosing and treating children possess the current scientific knowledge regarding child development and the development of the brain during childhood.

Professor Reif's assertion that global temperatures can be regulated by an international agreement to atone for our sins of emission is, therefore, at odds with scientific knowledge regarding cause and effect.

could better be stated «Such variability has important implications for the assertions of levels of certainty unsupported by the current level of scientific knowledge regarding climate change.

Overall, the Panel finds that given the current state of the science and the scope of resources available, the 2013 National Climate Assessment does a reasonable job of fulfilling its charge to inform the President, the Congress, and the nation about the current state of scientific knowledge regarding climate change effects.

This provides a clear picture of the current scientific knowledge regarding to the effects of physical activity on the health of people living with PD.

This policy statement aims to summarize the current state of scientific knowledge regarding the effects of virtual violence on children's attitudes and behaviors and to make specific recommendations for pediatricians, parents, industry, and policy makers.»

That is perfectly clear as regards an increase in the certainty of scientific knowledge regarding the actual fact of evolution.

Regarding our present scientific knowledge regarding the origin of the universe, or if there is an actual origin, the answer is «we don't know».

Not exact matches

I also think you have to consider some things such as the many medical laws in the Old Testament that were well beyond scientific knowledge at the time, regarding what people were to eat, germs, etc..

And with your knowledge of scientific understanding you should easily know that the «we don't know for sure» position is the one taken by the scientific community regarding the issue.

The scientific epistemology has dominated human knowledge; especially the method of the natural sciences has been regarded as most reliable not only for natural sciences, but also for social and human sciences.

It may be that if we had been there we might have found a «scientific» explanation of what the early Christians regarded as miraculous; and it is legitimate enough to use such knowledge as we now have, for instance, about the treatment of psychosomatic disorders, as a help toward the explanation of some of the cures reported in the gospels.

But when the psychologist is most «scientific,» he regards these answers as a part of the behavior of the subject and not as a source of knowledge of some inner, unobservable state.

Things like education, scientific knowledge, and scientific examination of the way humans act and react are needed to forestall any future «nightmare» of «biblical» proportions as regards survival of the human species.

The purpose of the program is to make practical contributions to more effective use of scientific knowledge in government, to educate the scientific communities regarding public policy, and to broaden the perspective of both the scientific and governmental communities regarding the value of such science - government interaction.

Whereas the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) believes that it is essential that federal agencies receive scientific, technical and medical advice that represents a diversity of informed views regarding the need for, and evaluation of, research and regulation in order that research and regulatory decisions are based on the best available scientific knowledge and

Additional comments made by the author himself indicate virtually no knowledge of the structure of medieval European society, or of the relationship between sacred and secular learning, and include a condemnation which even readers who are not anxious to return to the Middle Ages may regard as rather extreme: «the suppression of scientific thought by the medieval Church represents one of the blackest periods of human history».

Unfortunately, despite all the knowledge the scientific community has regarding immune mechanisms against cancer, there is still a lot more to dig in.

Now, despite the fact that we have more scientific knowledge and more access to research and literature than ever before regarding the importance of calories, the energy balance and how to structure our diets for optimal muscle building and fat loss through the use of flexible dieting, much of the training and dieting community is still stuck in the dark ages.

Our intention is to improve scientific knowledge and clinical practice regarding effective instruction for remediating reading comprehension difficulties for students in the middle grades (grades 4 and 5) and to link with previous studies that begin in grade 6.

Regarding the Georgia studies: They were performed at a time when sacrificing dogs for the sake of scientific knowledge was considered desirable and proper.

Her work springs from extensive experimentation with optical phenomena and research into philosophical debates regarding the mutability of scientific knowledge.

Regarding whether those ignorant in statistics can understand Hansen's latest papers, I'm a perfect test case: My knowledge of stats is low (if I had ever heard the term «sigma» before, I don't recall it), and only have a basic humanities major's ability to grasp scientific arguments (well, maybe a little better since I work with scientists as expert witnesses).

When a group of people claiming superior scientific knowledge and understanding refuses to grasp the extremely simple point I've been making regarding the heating capacity of an absence of volcanic eruptions, then I am forced to take all their other arguments with a huge grain of salt.

I see that once again A. Lacis has declined to share with us his thoughts, and scientific knowledge, regarding possible changes in non-radiative heat transfer from the surface.

Regarding «The search is for a robust policy, which is useful regardless of which of the diverging scientific interpretations of the knowledge is correct.»

No statement regarding the relative warmth of these periods even approaches scientific knowledge, with the exception of the statement «we don't know»

Hence the rise is attenuated; the notion of a «scientific consensus» is undermined by the true nature of the phenomenon, and of course as their skeptical knowledge deepens they also become more aware of the scientists who certainly aren't in the consensus (regarding calamity), plus the fact that the majority of themselves would be inside it if the definition remained limited to the properties of CO2.

Everywhere we look we can find virtual mountains of scientific research with regard to unsustainable pyramid schemes that are surreptitiously foisted upon the human community by a few deceitful people with knowledge at the expense of many too many others who are not «in the know».

I've paid more attention to the extreme claims in the literature warning of coming catastrophe, both because I regard the scientists there as more serious, and because I am very sympathetic to the goals of my colleagues who sometimes seem, however, to be confusing their specific scientific knowledge with their worries about the future.

One of the anonymous reviewers pointed out that the failure of policymakers to react sufficiently to the scientific understanding of global warming is paralleled by a similar failure with regard to scientific knowledge about population trajectories.

My Ph.D. in criminology and more than 20 years of criminal defense experience give me unique knowledge and insight regarding forensic evidence and the scientific aspects of my clients» cases.

Fact: There is no scientific knowledge that mental health professionals have that can assist a court in this regard.

While the presentation of research and scientific knowledge will form the core of the symposium, the objective is to place this knowledge in a management context and pose questions to Park Managers and Traditional Owners in the region, regarding future management frameworks and research directions.