Sentences with phrase «scientific majority consensus»

Not exact matches

«It will show Americans just how ideologically out of step they are with the overwhelming scientific consensus and a majority of Americans,» she said of the climate amendments.

Of course if the vast majority of the public trusts the scientific community, then to offset the misinformation, it is important that scientists speak up publicly and emphasize the consensus.

It was aimed more at reinforcing the resolve of the majority in the public and the policy - making community who, betting on the scientific consensus, are ready to move forward with a serious approach to dealing with the problem but are being slowed down by the ill - founded skepticism of a minority.

This text completely omits the consensus opinion of numerous scientific organizations, as though they did not exist, and uses politically loaded terms like «activist scientists» to label the majority of scientists.

People's political orientations are strongly related to their perception of the scientific consensus on climate change.4 In this survey, a strong majority of liberal Democrats (88 %) say most climate scientists think the Earth is warming due to human activity.

Large majorities in every major nation on the planet accept the scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.

When told a scientific consensus exists, and that it is on the order of 97 % of climate scientists, the vast majority of the public accept the science....

Despite the common perception that opinions vary across different parts of the country, survey data analyzed by Jon Krosnick at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment establishes that the vast majority of Americans are in agreement with the scientific consensus on global warming.

This has caused a problem for the skeptical community, because the majority of scientific skeptics accept the consensus of scientific opinion on anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

It is true that in west the majority of climate institutions support an undefined consensus & some scientific associations do too (but none have actually surveyed their members).

Hence the rise is attenuated; the notion of a «scientific consensus» is undermined by the true nature of the phenomenon, and of course as their skeptical knowledge deepens they also become more aware of the scientists who certainly aren't in the consensus (regarding calamity), plus the fact that the majority of themselves would be inside it if the definition remained limited to the properties of CO2.

Everywhere one looks one sees AGW proponents invoking terms like consensus, denial, settled science, vast majority of scientists, 97 % of scientists, and many others like this, all by way of claiming that there is no scientific debate.

Given that the majority view here on WUWT appears to be that the scientific consensus is simply wrong (or non-existent)-- as opposed to mendacious — I should have said ``... if anthropogenic climate change is a false alarm you — and your whole team — will without doubt deserve Nobel Prizes»

In lieu of a definitive scientific proposition linking anthropogenic CO2 to the imminent end of the world, the idea of a «consensus» was forged out of necessity (not through scientific discovery), allegedly consisting of «the vast majority of the world's top climate scientists».

From my post on why consensus matters in climate science to my follow up on why blogging is not science, it's common for climate skeptic commenters to claim that any reference to the majority of expert scientific opinion on climate change is simply an «appeal to authority».

Likewise, a majority believe there is a lot of disagreement among scientists over whether global warming is occurring, while over a fifth of the Dismissive believe there is a scientific consensus that global warming is not happening (Figure 9).