Not exact matches
John's premise is true
in that Einstein's Theory of
General Relativity, The Big Bang Theory, The Particle Physics Standard
Model, Quantum Physics / Mechanics, etc., let alone Darwin's Theory of Evolution, DO NOT PASS the «Modern
Scientific Method» when tried!
As I said
in my reply to Wegman, ordinarily I would agree with him that science shouldn't be conducted through blogs, but
in the case of climate science an opinion about global warming
in general, or the validity of multiproxy reconstructions or climate
models in particular seems to constitute for some a political viewpoint that must be either trumpeted from the rooftops or suppressed by any means possible regardless of its
scientific merit.
Now, if these
models are wrong... it * does not * mean that the
scientific community has low confidence levels
in the
general trends that future climate
models indicate which
model larger area.