Scientific publishing refers to the process of sharing scientific research and findings with the broader community. It involves publishing research papers, articles, and studies in scientific journals or online platforms, which allows researchers to share their work, receive feedback, and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.
Full definition
The demand has sparked widespread discussions among scientists, publishers, scientific societies and librarians about the future
of scientific publishing.
Are you contemplating a career
in scientific publishing — attracted by the chance to be at the forefront of scientific discourse?
However, she also briefly considered going
into scientific publishing, but she said she thinks that her nationality became an obstacle outside research.
To that end, the Society has developed a series of guidelines regarding ethical standards
for scientific publishing to assist and educate all who participate in the publication process.
During Blaser's workshop
on scientific publishing, an editor from Science will pull back the curtain on submitting to top peer - reviewed journals.
In 2008, Thomas C. Peterson, a research meteorologist at NOAA's National Climatic Data Center, wrote a peer reviewed published paper that counted all the major 68 peer reviewed
scientific published papers focusing on global climate from 1965 to 1979.
ASBMB President Suzanne Pfeffer writes about the evolution of
scientific publishing over the years and underscores the society's commitment to providing high - quality service and features to its members and journal authors.
► In
scientific publishing news, «biotech company Amgen Inc. and prominent biochemist Bruce Alberts have created a new online journal that aims to lift the curtain on often hidden results in biomedicine: failed efforts to confirm other groups» published papers,» Kaiser reported Thursday.
Spelling, grammar, and
scientific publishing Jim Austin, 12 February In the era of rapid online publishing, scientists can no longer assume that editors will catch their casual mistakes.
This month, it issued a declaration from the 1,050 journals it oversees — part of increasingly aggressive nationwide efforts to purge China's
corpulent scientific publishing industry and bring its home - grown journals, in both English and Chinese, up to international standards.
The report, «U.S.
Academic Scientific Publishing,» published November 19, follows a July 2007 NSF study which found that the absolute number of science and engineering (S&E) articles published by U.S. - based authors in the world's major peer - reviewed journals plateaued in the early 1990s even as funding and personnel increased.
An attached slideshow presentation, provided at the meeting, described a secret project called «Google Science,» a
new scientific publishing platform that combines Google Docs, Google Scholar, and YouTube.
This «sharing of solutions for further cumulative improvement,» Wisdom said, «can also be seen in music remixing, open
access scientific publishing and the use of Creative Commons licensing.»
Why
does scientific publishing only recognise these two categories — either authorship or acknowledged contributor — without any intermediate level of input?
The news came shortly
after scientific publishing giant Elsevier withdrew its support for the bill, following a threatened boycott of Elsevier journals by thousands of researchers.
February 2010 - Concerns over
scientific publishing hit the news EuroSyStem Coordinator Austin Smith has spoken out on the UK's BBC news The UK's BBC Radio 4 prime time news programme, «Today», has highlighted concerns about the scientific peer review process.
Postdoctoral scholars are expected to be able to design sound research protocols, safely perform the techniques necessary to conduct and analyze this research, and navigate the grant application and
scientific publishing processes.
There is a growing concern that the methods
ruling scientific publishing inherited from 19th century are not up to the task in the curent context.
Rasmussen went on to write: «In addition, the editors selected the referees on a nepotistic basis, which we regard as malpractice
in scientific publishing.»
The very lively debate
on scientific publishing and open access is spreading beyond the scientific and publishing circles as shown, among others, by the announcement by the European Commission of «a study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe» and by the publication of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report «Scientific Publications: Free for all?»
This report describes the challenges that advances in information technology pose for intellectual property law, and identifies a set of «core values» that should be embedded in a system
of scientific publishing.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which serves as a kind of moral compass
for scientific publishing (but has no authority to enforce its advice) has no guidance on the practice, but urges journals to vet reviewers adequately.
First, they determined the 1.1 million most common scientific words in published articles from
the scientific publishing giant Elsevier.
I would be able to relocate for the right job and would also consider working overseas.I'm not interested in
scientific publishing or journalism, but I am open to wider suggestions as I am feeling quite disillusioned about research and science in general following my recent experiences.What can a 35 - year - old academic do outside of science and technology?Jeff