It's a pretty
scientific read on the subject and came out in 1998, long before any of these books mentioned.
Not exact matches
In the two years I've been writing about open - plan offices, I've
read dozens of
scientific studies
on the
subject, all of which point out that they're a productivity disaster.
We are supposed to believe that obstetricians (with 8 years of higher education, extensive study of science and statistics, and four additional years of hands
on experience caring for pregnant women), the people who actually DO the research that represents the corpus of
scientific evidence, are ignoring their own findings while NCB advocates (generally high school graduates with no background in college science or statistics, let alone advanced study of these
subjects, and limited experience of caring for pregnant women), the people who NEVER do
scientific research, are assiduously scouring the
scientific literature,
reading the main obstetric journals each month, and changing their practice based
on the latest
scientific evidence.
And that's where I came up with the Turbulence Training program based
on interval training that I was using with athletes and the training that I was
reading about, the workouts that people were studying, and then also the workouts that I was using with
scientific subjects that I was testing for sports supplements when I was in the university.
Update: After
reading our original article
on the Shroud of Turin and its carbon dating, a USA college student writing a thesis
on the
subject asked us a The Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth that tradition associates with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus, has undergone numerous
scientific tests, the most
G. Reid Lyon, the director of the branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development that sponsors studies
on reading, has crisscrossed the country to herald the findings of
scientific research
on the
subject and press for sweeping change in
reading instruction.
The «favorite
subject» of many TEP middle school students, science excites students with a balance of hands -
on labs and rigorous
readings related to
scientific ideas.
Every morning, she carefully
reads the newspaper and, when she gets to the book listings, underlines the titles of interesting new publications — especially
on scientific subjects — which her staff orders, and she
reads.
if you don t believe those articles, feel free to
read scientific articles
on the same
subject, or talk to gardeners.
The research team surveyed the abstracts of over 12,000
scientific articles published between 1991 and 2011
on the
subjects of «global climate change» or «global warming» to see to what extent they endorsed or [continue
reading...]
Any careful
reading of the 2013 IPCC report and other recent
scientific literature about
on the
subject reveals that droughts have been worsening in some regions in recent decades while lessening in other regions, and that the IPCC's «low confidence» about a global trend relates mainly to the question of total area prone to drought and a lack of sufficient measurements to settle it.
I am someone who understands what science is and how it works, someone who has a basic world class university education in the hard sciences, someone who has participated in the space, computer and software revolutions in our society, someone who has
read extensively up
on hard science
subjects since before the computer and software revolutions, someone who figured out how to type keywords in the search bar after the software revolution, and thus, someone who has extensively
read up
on the hard science
subjects at hand after the software revolution, and thus someone who is intimately familiar with the many and evolving
scientific methods at the disposal of anyone who cares to
read up
on the
subject, and also someone who has at my fingertips all of the current results available.
It is understandably frustrating to be trained for years in a particular
subject - matter only for «joe» to come by
on» HowIfeeltoday.com» to simply assert it's all wrong, and for 100 people
reading to weight this equally to a
scientific report written by dozens of authors who have specialty in their field.
I
read the quote from Der Spiegel as evidence that the German minsters [and whoever else people can decide for themselves] made up their minds long ago
on the
subject of what they want to do and are simply not going to listen to any contrary «
scientific advice».
But the «not global, not as warm as today, «temporo - spatially heterogeneous»» parts seem more or less accurate, based
on the
scientific papers I've
read on the
subject (you have
read some, surely?).