Not exact matches
What, specifically, is the reason that you are «skeptical»
of the conclusions
of the overwhelming majority
of the world's climate scientists and every relevant
scientific organization in the world, including the national science academies
of every major country in the world, that
anthropogenic global warming is a
reality?
Brian, I'd recommend that you run the talking points through a
reality check before attaching your name to them — one excellent resource is skepticalscience.com, from whence (after.1 second
of effort) I reached the rebuttal to «Scientists predicted an impending ice age in the 1970's» («Is it really appropriate to compare the
scientific evidence for an impending ice age in the 70's to the
scientific consensus on
anthropogenic global warming today?»
What, specifically, is the reason that you are «skeptical»
of the conclusions
of the overwhelming majority
of the world's climate scientists and every relevant
scientific organization in the world, including the national science academies
of every major country in the world, that
anthropogenic global warming is a
reality?
That 40 % number is a falsehood - there is about a 98 % consensus
of all scientists who study this phenomena that
anthropogenic climate change is a
reality, and every major
scientific institution in the world supports the conclusion
of man caused
global warming.
In fact there is no genuine
scientific «debate» about the
reality of anthropogenic global warming.