Not exact matches
Out of the paper's journalistic
sloppiness the editors manage to rescue the satisfaction of once again suggesting that the Church is the enemy of
scientific progress.
I do however place trust in both
scientific process to work things out over time and in collections of scientists to spot incompetence /
sloppiness over time.
I don't know why you want to be seen as the guy selling sloppy highly politicized
scientific evaluations, and not sure why you wouldn't expect criticisms of that politicized
sloppiness.