Evolution may not have engineered our brains to know everything, but science has widened our knowledge through its stories — Big Bang cosmology writes
the scientific story of creation, chemistry writes the story of origins, biology writes the evolutionary epic, neuroscience provides the tales of the mind, and complexity sciences are producing still newer stories that cross traditional disciplinary lines.
Not exact matches
There are more
stories out
of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility...
Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and
creation «science»... which use
scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.
In the case
of creationism, for example,
scientific evidence now exists which contradicts directly with the
creation myth (unless one thinks
of the
creation story as being an allegory or something like that).
«The
creation story is taught in science and there is no evidence that pupils learn
scientific theories about the origin
of the Earth.»
The common «
creation story» emerging from the fields
of astrophysics, biology, and
scientific cosmology makes small any myth
of creation from the various religious traditions: some ten billion or so years ago the universe began from a big bang exploding the «matter,» which was infinitesimally small and infinitely dense, outward to create the untold number
of galaxies
of which our tiny planet is but one blip on the screen.
If we ask, «What are the chances that ancient Israel's
stories of creation contain valid
scientific information?»
If someone believes in the
creation story to the extent that they reject
scientific inquiry, they're not well - equipped to conduct the research and do the work needed in the future to benefit and improve the condition
of and ensure the survival
of the earth and its human and animal populations.
the biblical
story of creation was written by men with no
scientific training whatsoever.
I am interested in knowing why a group
of nearly naked primates came up with a
creation story that has survived to the present day and why it has similarities with what the
scientific method has produced as hypotheses for the history
of earth and its inhabitants.
Very readable is Brian Swimme's The Universe is a Green Dragon: A Cosmic
Creation Story (Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1984) which touches on many
of the
scientific issues discussed in this chapter.
Of course science has a different story to tell us and until someone refutes the scientific basis for the age of the earth and the evolutionary basis for the creation of life the Biblical explanation should be taught only in religious schools and has no place in secular public educatio
Of course science has a different
story to tell us and until someone refutes the
scientific basis for the age
of the earth and the evolutionary basis for the creation of life the Biblical explanation should be taught only in religious schools and has no place in secular public educatio
of the earth and the evolutionary basis for the
creation of life the Biblical explanation should be taught only in religious schools and has no place in secular public educatio
of life the Biblical explanation should be taught only in religious schools and has no place in secular public education.
She follows this account with
scientific versions
of the
creation story, drawing from them a sense
of the profound interdependence
of atmospheric, aquatic and organic systems.
Michael You're right, there were no eyewitnesses to the
creation story, but we can witness for ourselves the processes
of evolution,
of star formation, and a host
of others that form the
scientific view
of how the universe and life happened.
Genesis chapter 1 gives a poetic narrative
of human
creation, neither a fairy
story nor a modern,
scientific account.
The purpose
of the
creation story is not to give us
scientific information about the details
of the world's origin.
Taking the biblical
story of creation literally, as though it were in the same family
of propositions as
scientific statements, creationism sees modern scientifically based views
of the cosmos as exclusive
of and antagonistic toward biblical religion.
Others see the biblical
creation story as perfectly consistent with the general outlines
of scientific theories
of evolution.
Cleverstore apps are suitable for both primary and secondary age groups and designed to engage pupils and aid learning across a number
of subjects and activities such as maths games, interactive picture books,
scientific calculator,
story and song
creation, logic puzzles, periodic table and much more.
There's a wonderful
story, in fact, about the particular
scientific reason for the
creation of Big Bird.
We talked about the filmmakers» efforts to convey the
creation story in a way that meshed the storytelling power
of the Bible with time scales and images reflecting
scientific understanding
of the origins
of Earth and species.
It succeeds at telling the amazing
story of the universe and our Earth's
creation with
scientific accuracy but without diminishing the mystery and wonder.