Sentences with phrase «scientific talks by»

Gadêlha and the Oxford SIAM committee planned the agenda of the events they will hold this academic year, including an induction day for newcomers, student seminars, scientific talks by professors, networking events, visits to industry campuses, and an annual conference.

Not exact matches

You're talking about the type of «evolution» that we always knew existed and to make matters worse you're bragging about the advancements made by INTELLIGENT HUMAN BEINGS which still don't even come close to the complication of macro evolution but still required thousands of years of scientific advancement and knowledge and a team of researchers with high iq's working aroudn the clock with microscopes.
There are more stories out of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.
«The European talks of progress because by the aid of a few scientific discoveries he has established a society which has mistaken comfort for civilization».
I want to share with you a scientific discovery that the Quran talked about 1400 years ago and Muslims were perplexed by the meaning of this particular verse.
And now we get to watch while Creationists imprison Nye in a tower until he recants his sacreligous talk much in the way Galileo was imprisoned by the Church for supporting the scientific theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun rather than the universe revolving around the Earth.
’28 Kuhn's portrayal of normal science as dominated by unchallenged dogmas, his failure to specify criteria for paradigm choice, and his talk of «conversion» and «persuasion» all seem to these critics to threaten the objectivity and rationality of the scientific enterprise.
Now we may be looking at different problems here, or have different considerations in mind; but from where I view the matter, Bultmann's own statements seem to evade the crucial aspect of change in scientific thinking affecting the vision of our world; and his position, as amplified by Ogden's comments, seems to me simply not to square with the facts, as one may glean them from hearing scientists talk among themselves.
And the best way to sort it out is by carefully evaluating scientific studies - not by visiting Internet chat rooms, reading magazine articles, or talking to friends.
All she ever talked about was how hospital births and OBs are terrible, homebirth is best, vaccination hurts babies, all scientific studies are bought out by Big Pharma etc..
Apart from managing your PhD research project and science writing, you are also faced with the big challenge to present your research to a wider audience by holding scientific talks.
According to Cowal, Piot's success is due in no small measure to his scientific credentials, which gives him immense credibility when talking about the damage done by HIV and AIDS.
He was kind enough to drop by the Scientific American offices on June 18th to talk about Dirac.
This year O.H.S.U. is hosting seven weeks of activities, including talks by leading brain researchers and science writers such as Jonah Lehrer (a contributing editor for Scientific American Mind), a workshop for teachers, a brain fair and a scientifiScientific American Mind), a workshop for teachers, a brain fair and a scientificscientific meeting.
The drama implied by competition, war and selfishness passes unnoticed because people are used to this rather hyped - up way of talking even about current scientific...
Holt and talk - show host Thom Hartmann discussed a non-partisan 28 June letter sent to policymakers by 31 leading scientific societies, including AAAS, which warned of negative climate - change impacts to the global economy, natural resources, national security and human health.
At climate talks in Copenhagen a year ago, delegates were galvanised by the scientific arguments for reaching an agreement to cut emissions.
Award - winning author Douglas Fox talks about his cover story in the July issue of Scientific American about the limits of intelligence, placed there by the laws of physics
For the past 22 years, ever since finding the first exoplanets, researchers have generally preferred alphanumeric scientific designations blessed by the International Astronomical Union (IAU)-- we're talking exoplanetary handles like UScoCTIO 108b and TrES - 3b.
Reading literature in the field, writing a manuscript, attending overseas conferences, talking with leading scientists — during all these scientific activities, we need to deliver our ideas precisely and concisely in English, a foreign language that we are trained by all means throughout all our past education.
Talk about management by committee: one group of more than 800 scientist authors to cope with more than 9,000 scientific publications on climate change and more than 20,000 comments from «expert reviewers» (plus another 30,000 or so from various other interested parties.)
Many medical societies allow meeting attendees to earn CME credits by attending scientific talks; the problem is that some speakers have been company staff members.
Venter talked with Scientific American by phone about the award and his hopes for new technologies.
«We want people to engage in public affairs by getting them to run for office or be on the Hill to talk about their science and the importance of scientific integrity.»
To be sure, the exact details of the algorithm can not be evaluated because the dating sites have not yet allowed their claims to be vetted by the scientific community (eHarmony, for example, likes to talk about its «secret sauce»), but much information relevant to the algorithms is in the public domain, even if the algorithms themselves are not.
Watch a talk on the glymphatic system by Maiken Nedergaard, author of «Brain Drain» in the March Scientific American.
Scientific American's Josh Fischman talks with renowned astrophysicist and general relativity expert Kip Thorne about the discovery of gravitational waves by the LIGO Project, co-founded by Thorne.
So the National Center for Science Education decided to put together a raft trip, there's only one each summer, which for a little bit, they'll discuss what the creationists see, how they interpret what they're seeing, and then there's a geologist on board, fellow by the name of Steve Newton, and there's an evolutionary biologist who makes the trip, Josh Rozanow, and they will talk about various things that we're looking at from the scientific perspective.
The University of Michigan's Paul Mohai, a leading researcher of issues related to environmental justice, talked about the Flint water crisis at a workshop sponsored by the Institute for Journalism and Natural Resources, attended by Scientific American contributing editor Robin Lloyd.
More to explore «Carbonic Colors: Fizzy, Washable Sidewalk Paint,» from Scientific American and CrazyAuntLindsey.com «Talk through a String Telephone,» from Scientific American «Invisible Ink and More: The Science of Spying in the Revolutionary War,» from Scientific American «Invisible Ink,» from CrazyAuntLindsey.com George Washington, Spymaster: How the Americans Outspied the British and Won the Revolutionary War, by Thomas Allen Amazing Kitchen Chemistry Projects You Can Build Yourself, by Cynthia Light Brown and Blair Shedd This activity brought to you in partnership with CrazyAuntLindsey.com
It is also expected that the applicant would be of international standing as demonstrated by peer review experience, invited keynote talks, international collaboration, conference and workshop organisation etc., as indicators of scientific maturity.
While Tillerson has advocated for the US to keep a seat at international climate talks, he has also disputed the scientific consensus that global warming is mostly caused by human activity.
In addition to the invited talk by Dr. Andrei Gudkov, our CSO, company's scientific and technological achievements will be presented in 5 posters.
The Dresden Science Calendar supports interdisciplinary research in Dresden by collecting, structuring and distributing announcements of upcoming scientific talks via a unified internet platform.
while your arguments are well worth the read, you completely miss the point by failing to acknowledge that the article talks about a scientific recommendation partially inspired by historical facts and sustainable agriculture together with modern knowledge about what comprises a healthy diet.
Printed by a small publishing company known for other scientific masterpieces such as The Psychology of the Simpsons and You Do Not Talk About Fight Club» makes the rest of her article questionable at least and suspect at most.
Printed by a small publishing company known for other scientific masterpieces such as The Psychology of the Simpsons and You Do Not Talk About Fight Club, Campbell's book quickly hit the word - of - mouth circuit and skyrocketed towards bestseller status, with sales exceeding half a million copies to date.
Your answers will make up your personality profile and by using our scientific approach you could be talking to singles in St Helens in no time.
When the dead need to talk, Alex Craft is always ready to listen... As a Grave Witch, Alex solves murders by raising the dead The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and
This blog doesn't talk down to the reader, but also doesn't overwhelm her / him with the language already used by trainers or the scientific community.
Josh Campbell, Product Director at Backflip Studios, Paul Brownlow, VP of Product at Blastworks and Jeferson Valadares, GM / VP of Product Development at Bandai Namco Entertainment America will talk about optimizing IAP in a session moderated by Ted Verani, working for Scientific Revenue's Business Development department.
In light of the hard - won scientific consensus developed by the IPCC, has the time not yet come to «center» our discussion on what we know of climate change, based upon good science, and talk about what we are going to do in order to address the human - driven predicament in which humanity finds itself in these early years of Century XXI?
I also urge you to listen to this short, succinct and compelling talk in which Pandya illustrates the merits of getting the right scientific expertise to the right problem by showing how targeted meteorological forecasting helped improve the deployment of limited supplies of meningitis vaccine in sub-Saharan Africa, saving lives and money:
Here's an incomplete list of other interesting views on both the climate files and the coverage of them (or lack thereof) by the media, along with some stray tidbits, including a report on Copenhagen prostitutes fighting the city's efforts to clean up ahead of the talks and a classic case of potential scientific overreach in a story on how global warming may make sharks more aggressive:
Surely you do not think scientists or anyone else should sit idly by when politicians talk nonsense about scientific issues?
In a June 3 interview on the program Wake Up Call on WBAI - FM, the Pacifica station in New York, CSW director Rick Piltz talked about the scientific assessment of climate change released released May 29 by the U.S. government, the... Continue reading →
While those who stand in denial of climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human - induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported expert saying that climate change was not happening — or might actually be a good thing.
His comments here and elsewhere over time make clear that his skepticism is informed not by his command of the evidence and of the scientific method as it is practiced by actual scientists, but by his disdain for «orthodoxy» and his resentment at being told he doesn't know what he's talking about.
NASA's Gavin Schmidt even throws out a challenge: «Regardless of these spats, the fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the AGU or EGU meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists (not the famous ones, the ones at your local university or federal lab).
Similar deep misunderstandings of both the people, the science and the scientific method are shown by Andrew J. Hoffman in Talking Past Each Other?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z