The 2017 Postdoc Faculty Day drew over 150 attendees to the Carolina Club for a day of
scientific talks from Lineberger's top postdoctoral trainees.
There is always an opportunity to attend really interesting
scientific talks from all the Institutes and participate in Gladstone community events, such as charity walks, bake - sale fundraisers, student outreach programs, and so on.
There is therefore a foundation for distinguishing
scientific talk from theological talk in one and the same world.
Not exact matches
Author Carmine Gallo, who has written on the history of TED
Talks, cites
scientific research
from Dr. Paul King of Texas Christian University as well as insight into how the brain processes new information (and expends energy while doing so).
All of this comes
from a combination of reading
scientific literature,
talking to fitness experts, listening to lectures
from high - profile doctors, and doing my own self - experiments.
Now we may be looking at different problems here, or have different considerations in mind; but
from where I view the matter, Bultmann's own statements seem to evade the crucial aspect of change in
scientific thinking affecting the vision of our world; and his position, as amplified by Ogden's comments, seems to me simply not to square with the facts, as one may glean them
from hearing scientists
talk among themselves.
Consequently, how does one differentiate theological
talk from scientific talk?
We're not
talking porcelain, but it's practically
scientific fact that food tastes better when eaten
from a legit plate, with a fork that won't snap when you stab a piece of chicken.
This article is questionable as it has no links or actual references to the studies it
talks about, like someone above has mentioned also there is no information on how the diagnosis were made, and lastly it does not take into account that celiac disease is NOT an allergy, it is an auto immune disease where the body attacks its own cells confusing them with gluten proteins, it is not about tolerance, I would not be trusting this information, do lots of research on your own
from legitimate
scientific sources before making a decision.
In the following 2011 TED
talk, science reporter, author, and mother Annie Murphy Paul discusses the latest
scientific evidence gathered
from the fields of biology and psychology suggesting that some of our most important learning about the world happens before we are even born.
Apart
from managing your PhD research project and science writing, you are also faced with the big challenge to present your research to a wider audience by holding
scientific talks.
Talking casually with someone who has different core values and beliefs
from you (which tends to affect how people view a
scientific issue) can provide useful perspective.
For Aguilar, who learned about the program
from a professor, «I thought it would be a really great way to practice
scientific communication and
talk about conservation.»
This was the gist of a
talk Newman delivered on a cool, gray day last fall to a packed lecture hall in the cavernous Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, where more than 5,000 emergency physicians
from around the world gathered for the
Scientific Assembly of the American College of Emergency Physicians.
A job
talk is entirely different
from scientific talks or presentations at management meetings.
You need to be in a position where you can
talk freely about the
scientific merits of your previous project, the skills you can bring to the next company, and what you gained
from your postdoc (as well as some documentation to back this all up).
Listen for clips
from some of these lectures on the
Scientific American Science
Talk podcast, including Fovell's explanation as to why the notion of a freezing air mass that descends on New York City in the movie The Day After Tomorrow is goofy.
This week on the podcast: We'll hear a little more
from Alan Weisman, author of the best - selling book, «The World without Us, which is at its core — gigantic thought experiment, what would happen if human beings suddenly disappeared and we'll
talk to
Scientific American editor in chief, John Rennie, about some big doings at the magazine.
In this episode,
Scientific American.com editorial director Kate Wong
talks about the anthropology community's latest take on the remains of tiny humans
from Flores; chemist Jennifer Mass discusses how she uses her science background artistically; and journalist Paul D. Thacker reveals how what appear to be environmental groups may be wolves in sheep's clothing.
In this episode, Liz Johnson and Felicity Arengo
from the American Museum of Natural History take
Scientific American podcast host Steve Mirsky for a walk in the park — Central Park — to
talk about the spring bird migration and the role that Central Park and other green spaces plays in the lives of birds and other animals.
Scientific American's David Biello
talks about his article in the November issue that examines America's nuclear arsenal and options for the future and
Scientific American Mind magazine «sKaren Schrock gives us a rundown
from the big neuroscience meeting, that she attended last week.
In this episode,
Scientific American news editor Phil Yam discusses how veterinarians, physicians and multinational food companies need to work together in the global fight against animal - borne infectious diseases; and University of Wisconsin evolutionary biologist Sean Carroll
talks about recent research tracking the evolution of yeast genes with specific functions descended
from a single, duplicated gene with multiple functions.
Also critical: If an investigator's lab runs on federal funding
from NIH, he or she should
talk to a
scientific officer at the agency early on, to double - check that the start - up plans won't run afoul of government conflict - of - interest rules.
The irony is that,
from a comedic standpoint,
scientific talks are the perfect opportunities for absurdity because it's so unexpected.
One of them, I'd like to take a step back
from the
talk of science findings and
talk for just a minute about
scientific thinking.
Talk about management by committee: one group of more than 800 scientist authors to cope with more than 9,000
scientific publications on climate change and more than 20,000 comments
from «expert reviewers» (plus another 30,000 or so
from various other interested parties.)
We will
talk with Nobel Prize — winning physicist Frank Wilczek about the LHC and then we will get some commentary
from the
Scientific American editor George Musser.
Doing a postdoc in a lab where she was not free to set up collaborations or attend
scientific meetings to
talk about her work eventually steered former postdoc Anna Webb away
from research.
More to explore Singing Wine Glasses,
from Science Buddies
Talk through a String Telephone,
from Scientific American Blowing Bottle Tops: Making Music with Bottles,
from Science Buddies Science Activities for All Ages!
At the first Science Meets Congress event, Energy Solutions for a Sustainable Future, energy and innovation experts
from academia, government and the private sector
talked with
Scientific American Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina about American's energy future.
So the National Center for Science Education decided to put together a raft trip, there's only one each summer, which for a little bit, they'll discuss what the creationists see, how they interpret what they're seeing, and then there's a geologist on board, fellow by the name of Steve Newton, and there's an evolutionary biologist who makes the trip, Josh Rozanow, and they will
talk about various things that we're looking at
from the
scientific perspective.
Scientific American Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina and podcast host Steve Mirsky
talk about longevity differences in the sexes, the importance of music education, the pros and cons of the Kindle, and other content
from the November issue.
And in this episode, we «ll
talk about the September issue of
Scientific American magazine with Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina, and a little bit about one of the big questions of our time: Where is the money going to come
from to support new media?
More to explore «Carbonic Colors: Fizzy, Washable Sidewalk Paint,»
from Scientific American and CrazyAuntLindsey.com «
Talk through a String Telephone,»
from Scientific American «Invisible Ink and More: The Science of Spying in the Revolutionary War,»
from Scientific American «Invisible Ink,»
from CrazyAuntLindsey.com George Washington, Spymaster: How the Americans Outspied the British and Won the Revolutionary War, by Thomas Allen Amazing Kitchen Chemistry Projects You Can Build Yourself, by Cynthia Light Brown and Blair Shedd This activity brought to you in partnership with CrazyAuntLindsey.com
«At every
scientific meeting I'm at, everyone's
talking about this question: Why are some people with lots of amyloid plaques — the people who, according to our models, should get Alzheimer's — protected
from this runaway immune response?
In part 1 of this special Darwin Day podcast, celebrating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Darwin on February 12th, Richard Milner performs part of his one - man show about Darwin;
Scientific American Editor in Chief John Rennie and Darwin descendant Matthew Chapman read
from The Origin of Species; and Chapman
talks about his book 40 Days and 40 Nights, about the Dover intelligent design trial as well as about his efforts to get presidential candidates to discuss science — a project called ScienceDebate
For most of the
scientific talks and seminars announced here
scientific colleagues
from other institutions are more than welcome to attend.
The PPPL function that reaches out to students, teachers and the general public through programs ranging
from student internships to weekly
talks on
scientific topics
from January through April.
Our clients include, amongst others, Chief
Scientific Advisers; senior EU scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research f
Scientific Advisers; senior EU
scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research f
scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders
from pan-European
scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research f
scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors
from peer - reviewed journals; and various
talking - heads
from internationally renowned research facilities.
And Perdue's not the only leading recipient of Southern's political support to help spread the questionable
scientific talking points the utility has paid for: Rep. Gary Palmer, an Alabama Republican who received $ 18,000
from the company's PAC and employees in the 2014 cycle, last year told WATE that science «says global climate change is more a function of nature and solar activity than it is anything man does.»
Often these figures are not optimal for
scientific talks or oral or written presentations to audience members
from outside the field.
In this Q&A, Colbran
talks about his
scientific interests, his career path
from the United Kingdom to the United States and his work as a JBC associate editor.
There were nine
talks on citizen science and crowdsourcing, and Milton met with 16 different scientists
from all our
scientific divisions at Goddard.
«However,
from a
scientific perspective, it's important to remember that we're
talking about the first law of thermodynamics,» says Suveen Mathaudhu, a program manager in the materials science division of the U.S. Army Research Office, adjunct materials science professor at NC State University and hardcore comics fan.
While many of these gurus have earned their right to
talk, especially when they try to base their dietary advice on science and actual studies, they often declare certain kinds of food as villains and like to overinterpret data
from scientific studies.
Makeup artist Lisa Eldridge posted an Instagram Story last night of Bosworth
talking about her favorite beauty products, which, along with Emergin C
Scientific Organics Exfoliating Peel Pads and Olaplex Hair Perfector, included a surprising little supplement called Health
From the Sun Evening Primrose Oil.
But perhaps when teachers say they «know how children learn,» they are not
talking about learning
from a
scientific perspective but about craft knowledge.
Finally, Marcus
talks to Professor Philip Dawid about how juries could benefit
from an understanding of statistics when evaluating
scientific evidence.
These
talks range
from scientific to motivational, all with the aim of helping you elevate yourself as an investor and businessperson.
«I think the increased use of psychoactive drugs comes
from acceptance, even in the
scientific community, that it's okay to
talk about fear, stress and anxiety in animals,» said Carlo Siracusa, a clinical assistant professor of behavior medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine.