The great
scientific traditions of Europe have had strong national identities; one naturally thinks of Pasteur as French, Newton as British, Pauli as German.
Post-modernism substitutes relativism and subjectivism for
the scientific tradition of seeking (eventually) objective truth, and this is a grave menace.
Not exact matches
Process theologians belong to a
tradition of thought that contests the view that the best interpretation
of the
scientific data excludes any causal role for God.
Questions also are raised about the identity
of the church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account
of history, about whether there is a doctrine
of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring
of Protestantism, about the role
of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role
of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge
of modern
scientific and technological developments, about how other faith
traditions are related to this version
of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
The common «creation story» emerging from the fields
of astrophysics, biology, and
scientific cosmology makes small any myth
of creation from the various religious
traditions: some ten billion or so years ago the universe began from a big bang exploding the «matter,» which was infinitesimally small and infinitely dense, outward to create the untold number
of galaxies
of which our tiny planet is but one blip on the screen.
Luedemann [Jesus, 122 - 24] presents four (4) reasons for regarding the miraculous conception
of Jesus as unhistorical: (1) Numerous parallels in the history
of religion; (2) it represents a rare and late NT
tradition; (3) Synoptic descriptions
of Jesus» relations with his family are inconsistent with such an event; and (4)
scientific considerations.
Thus, the universal moral obligations that inhere in the
scientific commitment to truth are supplemented by the particular loyalties that are proper within the limited relationships
of actual cultural
traditions.
Dualism,
scientific materialism and the empiricist doctrine
of perception jointly constitute a compelling and nearly ineradicable
tradition of thought to which many scientists unknowingly appeal.
The Pope assures his reader, nonetheless, that in communion with the Church's living
Tradition and under the guidance
of the Holy Spirit «we can serenely examine exegetical hypotheses that all too often make exaggerated claims to certainty, claims that are already undermined by the existence
of diametrically opposed positions put forward with an equal claim to
scientific certainty» (p. 105).
The relation between Christian faith and the
scientific way
of understanding nature involves many complex and unresolved issues, but the plain fact is that
scientific understanding had to grow largely under secular auspices, with too little encouragement and understanding from the religious
tradition.
Our lead letter laments, with us, the failure
of the scholastic
tradition, from Descartes to its virtual collapse during the 20th century, to allow the implications
of scientific methodology to shape our metaphysics.
We are trying to grasp the meaning
of love in the Christian faith in responsible relationship to the scripture, to the classical
tradition, and to a contemporary
scientific and rational understanding
of our existence.46
Burhoe's point is that if cultural evolution is the subject for discussion, then the religious
traditions whose wisdom has survived millennia
of selective pressures can be left out
of the discussion only at the cost
of scientific adequacy and competency.
That the most advanced Christian thinker
of the century with a
scientific background could not see the conflict in those relations is another sign
of the inadequacies
of our spiritual
traditions, says Berry.
2Thomas Kuhn, «The Essential Tension:
Tradition and Innovation in
Scientific Research,» in The Third (1959) University
of Utah Research Conference on the Identification
of Scientific Talent, ed.
Teaching Creationism as a
scientific theory teaches people to reject the value
of evidence and accept dogma and
tradition.
The scientist as much as anyone else is dependent on the
tradition of the
scientific community, on its especial authority, responsibility and methods
of going about its
scientific tasks.
In every field
of endeavor — in
scientific inquiry, manners, family life, politics, and all the rest — man is not his own judge and master; he is «under orders,» he is answerable to principles
of «propriety,» he is responsible for the preservation, improvement, and perpetuation
of the «
traditions of civility.»
As with most academic
traditions, and especially those that are viewed as soft, there are orthodoxies and fashions, and sometimes sudden turns, that are conventionally described — following Thomas Kuhn's Structure
of Scientific Revolutions
of almost half a century ago — as paradigm shifts....
The class
of persons on whom by the
tradition of centuries the task fell,
of bringing to light the hidden presuppositions
of everyday thought, whether
scientific or historical, (I refer
of course to the official teachers
of philosophy) were treated with a contemptuous neglect.
«Instead
of defending the texts on the old complex grounds
of the oratorical
tradition, they are for the most part preaching the classics today in the name
of the Socratic or
scientific ideal
of the free - swinging intellect» (xi)
Many people try to solve this basic, problem by simply condemning the typical products
of the
scientific age and by reasserting the values
of the past — that is, by a resolute renunciation
of modernity in favor
of the «classical»
tradition.
Although his way
of working this out may not appeal to us, with our quite different
scientific knowledge, and our own philosophical idiom, the point here is that Aquinas, like the other theologians
of the great Christian
tradition, was no «spiritualist», denying or minimizing the material world and the physical body and their ways
of working.
«Some accepted examples
of actual
scientific practice — examples which include law, theory, application and instrumentation together — provide models from which spring particular coherent
traditions of scientific research.»
It also preserves Kuhn's most distinctive contributions concerning paradigms: the importance
of exemplars in the transmission
of a
scientific tradition, and the strategic value
of commitment to a research programme.
In the following three chapters I will analyse a paradigm as «a
tradition embodied in historical exemplars» and show how it dominates the patterns
of life and thought
of a
scientific or a religious community.
While Biblical hermeneutics provided the key to an understanding
of the role
of women in the church and family, dialogue between those whose
traditions have heard the Word
of God differently in other times and places held the key for the discussion
of social ethics, and engagement with the full range
of cultural activity (from psychotherapy to radical protest, from personal testimony to
scientific statement) was the locus for theological evaluation concerning homosexuality.
«More so than for any other religious
tradition, a person can become UU because
of what he already believes rather than believing what he does because
of becoming a UU,» said James Casebolt, coauthor
of two papers on the regional survey read at the Society for the
Scientific Study
of Religion annual meeting in October.
Perhaps the Eastern Christian
Tradition can provide a way to preserve the material blessings
of Western technology and
scientific insights without losing the intuitive spiritual wisdom gained earlier when Religious
Traditions experienced Grace more deeply by their participation in the natural rhythms
of life.
While well - acquainted with the
tradition of philosophical reflection on the soul and its relationship to the body, Fr Selman's knowledge
of recent
scientific research relevant to his subject appears less impressive and his terminology, and even some
of his ideas and arguments, can therefore appear outdated or irrelevant.
They also argue for the inclusion, not in the science curriculum but in the humanities,
of the comparative study
of creation accounts in the history
of the human race: various
scientific understandings, various understandings in the Judeo - Christian - Islamic
traditions, the Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto, Native American, and African
traditions.
The attitudes listed above operate less as personal motives than as presuppositions
of the whole
scientific enterprise and conditions
of work embodied in its institutions and
traditions.
Howard J. Van Till17 recently discussed the relationship
of scientific doctrines
of «self - organization» to the Christian
tradition, particularly to the writings
of Saint Basil
of Caesarea (330 - 379) and Saint Augustine
of Hippo (354 - 430).
[9] When this is so, then, it is in search, not so much
of answers, but rather
of a better understanding and appreciation
of «the truth that
scientific study
of the ancient
tradition of the Church is indispensable to success in comprehending the roots
of differences and in discerning the centre
of Christian theology,» [10] that we ought to approach the texts produced by the early church.
As we explore these issues our itinerary will be as follows: (1) we shall look first at several ways in which reflection on science has contributed to the feeling
of cosmic exile and therefore to our environmental carelessness; (2) then we shall examine how theologies from our own Christian
tradition that have hovered closely, even though critically, around modern
scientific cosmologies have perpetuated the same feeling
of cosmic exile; and (3) finally we shall look briefly at how a cosmological understanding
of religion centering on the notion
of adventure can both reconcile us to the evolving universe and at the same time allow us to embrace the feeling
of religious homelessness present in religious teachings.
Knowledge
of the existence
of a vital third (organic)
tradition — the others being Aristotelianism and mechanism — in the seventeenth century,
of its early success in promoting
scientific discoveries, and
of the dubious reasons for its defeat, may help embolden some theologians to revive this
tradition, in purified form, in a way that would be beneficial both to the religious life
of humanity and its «
scientific» understanding
of the reality in which it finds itself (p. 41)
Newbigin's contention, with which I wholeheartedly agree, is that «a standpoint outside the real human situation
of knowing subjects» is not available to us, and consequently Christianity is always received and transmitted within existing particular structures
of life and thought, as is also the case with the
tradition of scientific rationality.
You sciency - types do nt abandon your worldview even though the ancient greek
scientific philosophy that we base our western
scientific tradition on, arose in a society founded on the belief in 12 capricious anthropomorphic gods, an animistic «universe», and an unshakeable belief in the idea
of «fate».
Moreover, the premises
of freedom within the
scientific tradition imply wider freedoms; a culture which believes in the universality
of truth and shares a common dedication to it will encourage freedom
of discussion, rather than the settlement
of arguments by force.
But there is a process
of automatic co-ordination which, as Polanyi has pointed out, 4 does not endanger freedom because it is the
scientific tradition which governs individual efforts.
The basic assumptions
of the
tradition are acquired less from formal principles than from familiarity with its historical exemplars; commitment to a
scientific paradigm allows its potentialities to be systematically explored.
Princeton's James McCosh objected to such latitude and kept his college closer to the Presbyterianism that had spawned it, but even at Princeton the unsettling effect
of scientific reason on religious
tradition began to appear.
It will be a long
scientific analysis, but we will finally be able to see the original rock surface on which, according to
tradition, the body
of Christ was laid.
All
of our religious
traditions agree on this, and even
scientific humanism and nationalism agree as well.
Second, American historians
of religions must articulate their unique
tradition of scholarship so as to make significant contributions to the world - wide co-operative inquiry in the religio -
scientific study
of religions.
This essay was written with the conviction that the curriculums
of all institutions
of higher learning should include courses in the religio -
scientific study
of a variety
of religions, including some
of the major religions
of the East as well as the Judeo - Christian religious
traditions of the West.
The
tradition of the
scientific handbook as a concise, accessible source
of validated information emerged in the late nineteenth century when the factual burden
of scientific and medical subjects began to overwhelm students.
That democracy can be made to work, that by the
scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources
of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method
of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social
tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.
The Museum also continues the Academy's
tradition of research, conservation and education about nature in the Midwest through participatory exhibits and programs, educational outreach and ongoing
scientific activity.
Today the Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum continues the Academy's
tradition of nature research, conservation and education in the Midwest through participatory exhibits and programs, educational outreach and ongoing
scientific activity.