Sentences with phrase «scientific validity of claims»
I'd always wondered about the scientific validity of claims made regarding «left and right brain thinking», «Gardiner's Multiple Intelligences» and «brain gym exercise».
https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/
I can't answer for the scientific validity of the claims made by Bikram Yoga Instructors.
The formula industry objected to what it called the «grossly misleading visuals» in the ad campaign and questioned the scientific validity of claims of a higher incidence of diseases in babies who are not breast - fed.
Not exact matches
Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.
He also used this opportunity to criticize the current scientific model of publishing articles in peer - reviewed journals, claiming that it was a buddy - buddy system and peer - reviewing did not affect the validity of the article.
The claim that you need to eat many smaller meals throughout the day to accelerate fat loss still rings as true as it did two decades ago, and today we have a pile of scientific studies which support its validity.
The reality is, most of the circulating information is distributed by clever marketers, with very little scientific validity to back up their claims.
Although the landscape is extraordinary and increasingly valuable on a scientific level, there is validity to the claim that the public was cut out of the process.
A Stanford University study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, illustrates the claim's lack of scientific validity.
Mann's claim that the Oxburgh panel «exonerated» Mann on counts ranging from scientific misconduct to statistical manipulation to proper conduct and fair presentation of results has no more validity than his claim to have been awarded a Nobel prize for his supposedly seminal work «document [ing] the steady rise in surface temperatures during the 20th Century and the steep increase in measured temperatures since the 1950s.»
If you reject this, then effectively you'd be claiming that the whole field of science is crooked — and every field would fall under the same suspicion, essentially you'd be rejecting the validity of the scientific process itself.
What w. did 40 years ago in a totally different situation has no bearing on the validity of his arguments in the ongoing scientific debate surrounding the IPCC CAGW claim today.
The question I have is, are we now even more certain about the validity of the scientific claims for catastrophic warming?
As for the popular press, Al Gore, his scientific team and their claim that CFC gases are responsible for the creation of the OzH, I must say I personally have my many doubts of their validity.
An analysis of the mall study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations, internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall study within scholarly and legal arenas.