Sentences with phrase «scientific way of thinking»
The scientific way of thinking is an ideal means for resolving questions about causality, providing valuable guidance when there are conflicting views on matters concerning physical relationships.
https://link.springer.com/
You have taken this entirely reasonable and standard scientific way of thinking and claimed that Dr Hansen «proposes faking the data... to support his theory».
Stanford's d.school has developed design thinking, which is a codification of the artistic or scientific way of thinking:
A more scientific way of thinking about it is that large parts of the system have reached an ecological tipping point.
The realization of the crucial significance of relations between persons, and of the fundamentally social nature of reality is the necessary, saving corrective of the dominance of our age by the scientific way of thinking, the results of which, as we know, may involve us in universal destruction, and by the technical mastery of things, which threatens man with the no less serious fate of dehumanization.
Appeals more to my scientific way of thinking.
They need total submission «for instead to modern thoughts which are rooted in scientific way of thinking».
The new ideal was free inquiry, scientific ways of thinking, and rationalism.
But if we are to come to the roots of the problem, we have to go deeper into the mythic, theological, and scientific ways of thinking upon which our anthropocentrism is erected.
To posit a subjective capacity to feel at the heart of all the moments that make up the cosmic process goes beyond the limits of scientific ways of thinking, but it is not a position that in any way conflicts with a coherent cosmology.
Furthermore, it encompasses the understanding of key concepts and principles of science, the capacity for scientific ways of thinking, the knowledge that the study of science is a human enterprise, and an understanding of what that implies about its limitations.
Not exact matches
Keath also cites the show's use of music to inspire creative thought, and how it «always talks about something I've never heard of, some strange new discovery or scientific problem being solved in a weird way.»
«The way we think about it is that we used to have a very narrow focus on weight, and now weight is one of things we focus on but it's not the only thing,» Gary Foster, Weight Watchers» chief scientific officer, told Time magazine in late 2015.
If you liked this post you might also like The secret to creativity, intelligence and scientific thinking: Being able to make connections and The science of self - control: 6 ways to improve your willpower
Ever since we posted our view on emergency funds, we have been thinking about a succinct, straightforward but also scientific way to debunk that bad, bad, bad advice that investors should hold large amounts of cash in a money market account.
Under your approach, one could look at previous eras of scientific thought (which, by the way at one time also believed that the earth was flat) and, finding mistakes, decide that all of science was no more than a bunch of hooey!
By the way, if you think there is no scientific evidence for the origin of love (as apposed to similar emotions, like lust), you're wrong.
Scientific «truth» can be thought of as the same way.
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»
«In light of [the] would - be scientific intellectual model, matters of faith appear as archaic... This way of thinking... has changed man's basic orientation towards reality.
Unless you establish that you know something specific in the Quran that contradicts your LOGIC and way of thinking (challenges established truths and scientific evidences), I am puzzled why you are not Muslims yet?
Also the scientific method is more than a concept, it actually describes a way of thinking.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
This theoretical attitude, which comes so naturally to modern scientific humankind, is likely to be far more destructive to Christianity than any attack that the atheists might launch, because it can cut the very heart out of the Christian life — and in such a way that the individual does not at all think of himself or herself as having given up the faith.
They typically don't think that prayer and devotion can affect the outcome of scientific experiments so they can keep their religious beliefs separate from the ways in which they view the world working.
Our Western culture has moved so rapidly in the past half century, our ways of thinking have been so affected by the scientific, technological, and secular advances, that our situation seems divorced almost completely from society as presupposed in biblical and traditional theological thinking.
In this way, non-theological currents of thought, including scientific ones, inevitably and often unconsciously influence the ideas of theologians.
One passing thought, I suggest that you can prove the existence of God in a scientific way.
Similarly, in scientific thought, where once again we are indebted to Whitehead, among others, for making clear to us the way in which such thought, along with the procedures it uses and the attitudes it takes, represents a genuine process of development and not sheer novelty entirely unrelated to the past.
With that being said, I'm not a huge fan of his theory as it is not really a quality scientific theory, but rather a paradigm or way of thinking that has generated many poo infested discussions on the topic.
What Genesis did was essentially put divinity over the material world in such a way that made it fair game for the type of Western thought, reason and scientific inquiry that exists today.
Our scientific - critical thinking, our total experience of life, our emotional and volitional ways of reaction, are strongly shaped by our specific Christian presuppositions and Western ways of thought and life.
Certainly that is ONE way to interpret the current data, and I happen to think it is very likely that your statement is correct (I am a «believer» in my own mind of this statement), but it is not an automatic a ssumption and there are several scientific and philosophical papers that describe viable mechanisms that would overturn that a ssumption.
I think I was put on this earth to make the world a better place — or help people to get more out of life — in a way that doesn't require any scientific knowledge.
My sons demonstrated scientific thinking far more when they wrote computer programs, or tried out new ways of building lego structures, or new ingredients for baking.
While many researchers think of citizen science as a way to engage children and teenagers, many of citizen scientists are adults, some of whom bring scientific expertise from other fields, she said.
The AAAS training also helped Ernst start a Twitter account (@ernstkc)(«I used to think it was a forum to just share trivial personal details about your day, but I have been impressed by the level of scientific discourse that goes on in the Twittersphere»), publish an op - ed on public health in the border region, and embrace the wide range of ways scientists can engage with the public.
Asked for comment, a NASA spokesperson called doubts about Kepler 452 b «an example of the scientific method at work and the way in which science is an evolving process as new information challenges us to revise our thinking and fine - tune our hypotheses.
«Innovation is fundamental to all aspects of our business,» adds Norbert Bischofberger, Gilead's executive vice president, research and development, and chief scientific officer, «from what our researchers do in the lab to how we think about reaching patients to the way we work with government, public health, and industry partners.»
It's probably worth at least a footnote that like many things in our memory, they are not always as trustworthy as you think — and I think some people would go back and look at some of those old issues and be a little bit disappointed that some things were not exactly the way that they remembered them — but the fact is that for its time, Scientific American was a fantastic science magazine.
«Given this complete absence of interest in a space now approaching 3 years, I think it's fair to say the scientific community has come up with other ways to answer the kinds of questions they used to ask with chimpanzees,» Collins tells Science.
«Prior to this, there has never been an easy way to measure teachers» knowledge of student thinking, while we have probably been placing too much emphasis on testing for advanced scientific knowledge.
To our knowledge, never before has a videogame intervention been developed with such extensive input from its target audience, and tested through rigorous scientific methods over a long stretch of time, demonstrating that kids will engage in a game with serious content and learn things that impact the way they think and potentially what they do.»
The research, published in the journal Scientific Reports, shows for the first time that the way in which fat is made within the body is not «pre-programmed» during the early years of development as previously thought but even in adulthood cells can be influenced by our environment to change the type of fat that is formed.
Each chapter details one scientific discovery, clinical advance, dreaded illness, or conceptual shift that altered the way people thought of the body or treated disease.
Published in Scientific Reports, the model is a new way of thinking about glass and details the extremely unusual properties of a perfect glass.
«It may seem hypocritical, but I don't think the use of social media is a good way to establish a scientific career at all,» proflikesubstance writes.
«I think it's kind of fun,» says Larry Abbott, a physicist at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts, «but I don't think it's a sensible way to disseminate scientific results in general.»
There is a hunger out there for wonder, for understanding, and there are people out there who think that the scientific worldview somehow denies, somehow reduces the poetic vision of the universe, which in its petty, paltry way their religion seems to give them.
Chapman: Yeah, and that's a good piece of work and what it did for me — to go on to continue that thought about the way in which it was an education — is what I saw was that it was possible for a complicated scientific subject to be discussed in front of a lay audience, not be patronizing to the lay audience, get across a lot of information and excite people because the local people were meeting outside the court and they were saying, «Well did you hear the things about the bacterial flagellum?»