Sentences with phrase «scientific work by»

These patterns included attempts to change science statements, generally either to downgrade the significance of certain issues of concern or to downgrade accomplishments of previous scientific work by creating an enhanced sense of scientific uncertainty.

There is credible peer - reviewed scientific work by leading climate scientists, published more than a decade ago, that hypothesized that precisely this sort of blocking pattern would become more frequent with disappearing Arctic sea ice.

One of the most interesting scientific work by the skeptics is a paper by Indur M. Goklany, a former scientist at the U.S. Department of the Interior, now associated with the Cato Institute.

He adds that this represents a body of scientific work by hundreds of scientists going back to the 19th Century.

By serendipity, the scientific work by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) is building bridges across difficult political borders to help achieve shared goals in food security and poverty alleviation.

The essays vary from the bogglingly scientific works by former MIT Meteorology professor, Richard Lindzen, and scientist Willie Soon, to the beloved snark and witticisms of Mark Steyn, who is currently engaged in a lawsuit against Michael Mann, creator of the «hockey stick» graph.

Not exact matches

Despite decades of work by public - health researchers hoping to prove their case on a scientific basis, conclusive evidence is nowhere to be seen.

I was struck by their commitment to and faith in their inner artistic voice, a message that inspired me to be more creatively courageous, both in my scientific work and in my personal life,» she says.

But to every rule there is an exception, and glad I was to be called out (and called up) by the founder and CEO of one mobile - health company whose entire premise is based on scientific research with repeatable results — the exact study, in fact, I had used as my example of what works better than a health app.

Perhaps the best historical quip relevant to the taxation of cryptocurrency comes from Thomas Kuhn's 1962 work «The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,» in which he states, «scientific revolutions are here taken to be those non-cumulative developmental episodes in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole or in part by an incompatible new oScientific Revolutions,» in which he states, «scientific revolutions are here taken to be those non-cumulative developmental episodes in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole or in part by an incompatible new oscientific revolutions are here taken to be those non-cumulative developmental episodes in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole or in part by an incompatible new one.»

GFI builds the capacity of the animal advocacy movement by recruiting scientists and entrepreneurs to work in cellular agriculture and plant - based technology and by doing scientific research.

You're talking about the type of «evolution» that we always knew existed and to make matters worse you're bragging about the advancements made by INTELLIGENT HUMAN BEINGS which still don't even come close to the complication of macro evolution but still required thousands of years of scientific advancement and knowledge and a team of researchers with high iq's working aroudn the clock with microscopes.

Definition of «miracle:» A surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency.»

This work helped Protestant and Catholic scholars break out of tired, polemical post-Reformation patterns of interpretation (which were greatly reinforced by earlier, supposedly «scientific» Protestant historical critics in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries).

Evolution is a scientific theory that explains how the natural world works and is supported by facts, observation, laws, and repeated testing.

In another publication, Fletcher wrote that «I am afraid that reality has overtaken Meyer's book and its flawed reasoning» in pointing out scientific problems with Meyer's work by citing how RNA «survived and evolved into our own human protein - making factory, and continues to make our fingers and toes.»

Then by all means, post the names of these many scientists, their qualifications, the research centers where they work, the age ranges they propose along with the scientific research that supports their claims.

«Miracle: A surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency.»

@ total non sense Perhaps we're splitting hairs here, but I was trying to be kind by implying that rather than treating religiosity as a mental disability, for which the supposedly clinically sick can receive insurance benefits and evade personal actionable responsibility by claiming illness, it would be better to treat religiosity as a societal functional disorder which can be addressed through better education and a perceptional shift towards accepting scientific explanations for how the world works rather than relying on literal interpretations of ancient bronze age mythologies and their many derivations since.

It does this, not by guess work, and certainly not by indulging personal preference or caprice, but by employing scientific methods of observation, analysis, hypothesis and verification, which are well tested in other fields of study.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single bit of modern scientific knowledge that wasn't discovered, or heavily influenced by, the work of devout Christians.

Again, proof and evidence guided by the scientific method or a preponderance of evidence weighed objectively seems to work better than taking as «proof» anecdotal testimony.

However, common sense that is also backed by scientific research is a valuable resource, and a gift to those whose everyday work can be helped by the insight it provides.

Others have insisted that their work is social - scientific in the strong sense of the term — that is, as work guided by the correlation of models and data, as are more purely sociological and social - psychological studies.

And that his work was being discounted by the rest of the scientific community.

Being a YEC is not an automatic disqualification for doing scientific work because science is driven by an objective methodology, so as long as that methodology is not compromised then one is free to think whatever they please.

Feminists began their critical work in response to insults and injustices generated — to paraphrase Sobrino — by scientific and philosophical understandings that «explained» and «gave meaning to existing realities» of exclusion, especially of women.

While there are no guarantees that any scientific proposal will work as predicted, this proposal is exceptionally well supported by a large body of established scientific evidence.

This does not mean, of course, that the author ever forgets or betrays his science; what it does mean is: that the reader's approach, and response, to these pages must of necessity be quite different from those demanded by the scientific works.

Thus believing theology can begin its work by taking for granted a system of theological concepts and affirmations with a proved scientific basis.

Science and Logic (I'm an engineer btw and use the scientific method at my work daily) are the offspring of philosophy and limited by such.

but fortunately there are psychologists, mental health practitioners and others who do and I have benefitted greatly from their work, personal testimonies and the various articles / publications which they have produced --(for example, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology; The Religious & Spiritual Problems category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) published by the American Psychiatric Association; The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed.gov database of healthcare and scientific literature)-- about the adverse psychological effects which can arise when persons engage in intense / deep spiritual practices such as intense / deep prayer, fasting and meditation which alter their state of consciousness.

Kuhn held that the thought and action of a scientific community are dominated by its paradigms, defined as «standard examples of scientific work which embody a set of conceptual, methodological and metaphysical assumptions».

Some of the easier parts of Whitehead, then Plato, then a whole series of thinkers lighted up by these two, helped me to glimpse a few of the simpler presuppositions that scientific men take for granted in their work, and encouraged me to look further.

[37] In another publication, Fletcher wrote that «I am afraid that reality has overtaken Meyer's book and its flawed reasoning» in pointing out scientific problems with Meyer's work by citing how RNA «survived and evolved into our own human protein - making factory, and continues to make our fingers and toes.»

The publication of related scientific literature (which up till now has been strictly forbidden and persecuted by the autocratic feudal government) must now form one of the items of our party work.22

The statement, therefore, that everything is matter, has no precise sense on the lips of a materialist who is working with purely scientific methods, for in his system and with his methods he can not say what he understands by matter.

«Investigation by the University of Leicester, working with the Looking for Richard Project, has provided further scientific insights.

One man working in an industrial laboratory, with half his salary paid by the government, was given his instructions beforehand: «Any discoveries you make which have any scientific or commercial value, and any work you do which is at all profitable, is to appear on the books as having been done on «company time»; the rest is the government's half of your time.

Some scientists have gone overseas as medical, agricultural, or scientific missionaries and teachers; are there not in America most of the same opportunities for service to mankind and for witness by word and work to one's religious faith?

And if there are some scientific geniuses who can give the greatest service to society by giving attention only to their work, they should do even this as an expression of, not an escape from, responsibility.

In fact, the process is a good deal more deductive — the vast majority of working scientists begin by assuming scientific realism, then asking what underlying, noumenal features of the world might lead to the kind of evidence that we observe, then building a theory concerning what other kinds of evidence these noumena might produce, then seeking confirmatory and disconfirmatory evidence.

What is notable about them is that they lead us to acknowledge that scientific work is energized throughout by a faith or trust that truth is worth pursuing, by a faith that it is worthwhile joining with others in an effort to uncover the facts about the world, and by the belief that it is wrong to deviate from a method that brings us to the truth.

But he has not yet been informed by the inspector general's office of specific charges or questions related to the scientific integrity of his work, said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

Traditional and comfortable certainties about God, man, and the universe have been threatened or destroyed for many by the impact of two world wars and the scientific revolutions wrought by Copernicus, Darwin, and Freud.

The Decision was not made by any scientific study it was a personal decision that took H0m0s off the DSM and in turn since you cant seem to follow this the DSM is what most physcs use so in turn they like you parrot a view point so they also chime in that is how science works.

The complaints are tempered by her biologist's curiosity, and the mix of memoir and scientific observation works.

Since the twentieth century worked out its initial attitude toward the «historical Jesus» in terms of the only available reconstruction, that of the nineteenth century with all its glaring limitations, it is not surprising to find as a second consequence a tendency to disassociate the expression «the historical Jesus» from «Jesus of Nazareth as he actually was», and to reserve the expression for: «What can be known of Jesus of Nazareth by means of the scientific methods of the historian».

Church growth people attempt to apply to the American scene the scientific principles of church growth as developed by Donald McGavran, based on his 30 years of missionary work in India.

Human cognition, whether scientific or religious, can work only by being selective.