Sentences with phrase «scientific work has been done»

I don't know of any scientific work has been done to confirm that.

Not exact matches

This is the first thing we talk about in Lean Startup because you can not do any of the techniques of Lean Startup — the rapid experimentation, the scientific approach, the broad development — none of it makes any sense and can't work unless you have a vision for what you are trying to accomplish.

For the last two decades, we had been trying to work out the fundamental science of quantum computing, and right now, a lot of the scientific advances are done.

As a genuine request, look into the scientific research that the RCC is and has been doing and you will find that their scientific division works on the same cutting edge problems as non-Christian Scientists.

I don't want the next generation of doctors and scientists to not know how basic immunology really works because they have been brainwashed into beliefs over scientific experimentation and theory.

Without God, we are torn in two directions: universities praise diversity, but students still form cliques; politicians promise a bright future, but our news programmes are distressing; people are obsessed with scientific explanations of everything, and equally obsessed with the sentimental love expressed in pop songs; sexual abuse with a minor is the most shameful of all crimes, but everyone has a right to complete sexual liberation once they reach the age of consent; we relocate all over the world, preferring to live anywhere but home, yet we still agonise over our local sports club; we own many things, and still feel we don't have enough; we believe in discipline at school or at work, but we all have a right to «let ourselves go» at the weekend; we tolerate everything, except people that don't agree with us.

You do understand that EVERY scientific theory and equation has been modified and will continue to be modified, e.g. Newton's laws of motion were wrong — they worked ok at low speeds, but were nontheless wrong: they have since been modified.

but fortunately there are psychologists, mental health practitioners and others who do and I have benefitted greatly from their work, personal testimonies and the various articles / publications which they have produced --(for example, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology; The Religious & Spiritual Problems category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) published by the American Psychiatric Association; The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed.gov database of healthcare and scientific literature)-- about the adverse psychological effects which can arise when persons engage in intense / deep spiritual practices such as intense / deep prayer, fasting and meditation which alter their state of consciousness.

What we call supernatural is just God's way of doing his work, we have tried to come up with a scientific explanation of God's work to help us understand what happened.

Then, when medicine and faith work together and you are healed, give praise and glory to God, both for what He has done in your body, and also for what He has taught the medical - scientific world about how the body works.

Of contemporary scientists, 70 per cent believe in the existence of God and 40 per cent are church members.1 Do such beliefs have any relation to scientific work?

One man working in an industrial laboratory, with half his salary paid by the government, was given his instructions beforehand: «Any discoveries you make which have any scientific or commercial value, and any work you do which is at all profitable, is to appear on the books as having been done on «company time»; the rest is the government's half of your time.

«Great involvement in science and scientific work did not temper Lemaitre's religious impulse that had led him to the priesthood -LSB-...] He was a very good priest, very comprehensive, considering Christianity on a much deeper level than its exterior formalisms.

I would say that form as «transcendent» indeed seems to be coherent with recent scientific work, especially in biology - yet with a qualification: we must not locate this transcendence in a «world of forms» as Plato did (this is such a poor reading of Thomas - not that I accuse you of it).

Without God, we are torn in two directions: universities praise diversity, but students still form cliques; politicians promise a bright future, but all our news programs are distressing; people are obsessed with scientific explanations of everything, and equally obsessed with sentimental love in every pop song; sexual abuse with a minor is the most shameful of all crimes, but everyone has a right to complete sexual liberation once they reach the age of consent; we relocate all over the world, preferring to live anywhere but home, yet we still agonize over our local sports team; we own many things, and still feel like we don't have enough; we believe in discipline at school or at work, but we all have a right to «let ourselves go» on the weekend; we tolerate everything, except people that don't agree with us.

That democracy can be made to work, that by the scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.

While I can't promise that this approach will work for everyone and I don't have any scientific reasons to justify it, it's at least worth trying, especially if you can work from home (or visit your baby in day care) at least a couple times during the week to help maintain your supply (I was able to do this), and if you can pump or feed your baby before you leave for work and right when you return home (I also did this).

Scientific research shows that physical punishment does not work in the long run, is associated with an increased risk for many behavioral and psychological problems, and is simply unnecessary given that we have non-violent discipline techniques that are very effective.

I've done the bum patting, rocking, rocking in different rhythms, sometimes dancing, sometimes fit ball bouncing, we had an elvis song he loved that worked for months while we rocked him, and if he seemed to fight sleep in my arms, I used a «pattern break» — something you'd be aware of I think, as you are quite scientific.

I would be able to relocate for the right job and would also consider working overseas.I'm not interested in scientific publishing or journalism, but I am open to wider suggestions as I am feeling quite disillusioned about research and science in general following my recent experiences.What can a 35 - year - old academic do outside of science and technology?Jeff

«We did scientific theoretical work that told us this would work, but this was the first time we proved our prediction,» Sharma said.

For Fanaroff as well as other workshop speakers, science diplomacy — or the use of scientific collaboration among nations to build international partnerships — has been integral to their work, even if they did not realize it at the outset.

It's «phenomenal» work — both in terms of what it reveals about Picasso's artistry and the development of new technology, says Jennifer Mass, a cultural heritage scientist at the Scientific Analysis of Fine Art in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who has done similar imaging work on another one of Picasso's paintings but was not involved in the new research.

«One of the intriguing aspects of this project is that for us to better understand this dinosaur in our home state, we had to also rely, in part, on the results of the scientific work the Perot Museum has been doing in Arctic Alaska over the same window of time.»

Because her training in India had led her to take a descriptive scientific approach rather than attempting to unravel how things work, Smith recalls, «I didn't know if she was actually going to make a scientist or not.»

That said, one could argue that it is too much to expect that any of these three would be able to catch this type of fraud and that, in fact, the scientific process did work.

Besides the interesting scientific work I got to do, I was able — indeed had — to learn all the skills necessary for running a company.

Rennie: Sure, Eugenie Scott from the National Center for Science and Natural Education, who has done wonderful work for years in trying to make sure that evolution, is taught appropriately in public schools and to try to discourage the teaching of creationism under any of its various guises as a bad scientific alternative to that.

The work of Krech, Gerlache, Borchgravink, and Bruce had not yet been done; the examinations of the «Belgica,» the «Francais,» and the «Pourquoi Pas» had not yet made known the extension of Palmer Land to the southwestward along the southern confines of the Pacific Ocean; the explorations of the German Antarctic Expedition in the «Gauss» had not yet confirmed the conclusion of Wilkes that the long coast which he had discovered in 1840 extended still farther to the westward; the Antarctic Continent had not yet been entered at any point and consequently that acquaintance with the general topography which constitutes the first essential to the scientific investigation of a country was wholly wanting,

Scientists at the highest ranking universities published fewer papers between 1993 and 1997 than did their peers at other institutions, but the work was rated as having higher scientific impact.

I was hired to do scientific research for which I had prepared, and it is fair to expect reasonable compensation for this work.

Doing productive science with colleagues from other countries — whether you've gone abroad as an international student, postdoc, or more senior researcher, or are working in your own country with collaborators or subjects located elsewhere — thus demands not only «high - level scientific skills» but also attention to «cultural and social aspects [that] are not intuitive.»

What do you do when you have worked to build a scientific career all these years and suddenly you are told that you need to think about doing something else?

To be of interest to LMB, young scientists should have done important or original work in more than one scientific setting.

«The people who get lots of grants are by and large brilliant people doing really good work,» says Ross McKinney, chief scientific officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, D.C. «We'd really like to see the details because we could change the incentives in ways that are not constructive if we are not careful.»

It all started in 2011, when Chirayath — a photo enthusiast whose subjects have included astronomical objects, marine and natural subjects, and nonprofit work he did in Kenya — was looking for ways to combine his love of fashion photography, laboratory - grade optical effects, and scientific topics.

DiChristina: Yeah, I mean I think one of the things we don't realize working on the insides of Scientific American all the time is that the editor is not just working with the scientists but also they're reporting and going out to meetings and doing other things; they're [scouring] the world for the best science that matters for readers, have a lot of expertise themselves and it just seemed to me that this would be the kind of thing that readers might really find fascinating — what the editors of Scientific American [are] thinking based on all their conversations with the experts of the day covering the various areas of science and technology and how it affects our lives; and this was the genesis of this story.

But given that the government is introducing it, we've decided we should work with them to get it as effective as possible so we don't limit the introduction of scientific talent coming from overseas.»

Of the great whales, humpbacks have had a hell of a lot of scientific work done on them, yet here's this really basic bit of information about them that's just coming out now.

The policies governing NIH grants, contained in a document called Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, do not include a broader impacts criterion, although PIs and postdocs each have a «dual role» as persons who are simultaneously both working on a specific research project and giving or receiving training, says Walter Schaffer, NIH senior scientific adviser for extramural research, in an interview with Science Careers.

Mariette: The other half of that quote is «Information also wants to be expensive,» and it goes on to explain that because if you want quality information, that takes time to produce and it is thus very precious; and I think it's with that half of the quote in mind that Scientific American and other publications need to make these step - by - step choices to find out what ultimately will be best for you, our readers, because if the magazine does not have a working model of providing good quality material, then no one is served.

Also, as a scientist, having the support of the scientific cores, the purchasing, information technology, and editorial departments, and more, is a huge plus, especially for someone who has worked at other institutions where you have to do almost everything by yourself.

While there is still plenty of work to be done on the implications, the scientific debate over whether rising greenhouse gas levels are the principal cause of this warming has effectively been dead for years, despite the heroic efforts of some sections of the media to keep it on life - support.»

Greenpeace was there to ask Heartland about the report's funders, including billionaire Barre Seid, and to challenge Heartland's assertion that their work has any scientific validity (it doesn't).

Now we've explained the work in detail, you can hopefully see why we don't think it's appropriate for the news media, or the scientific community, to herald these two drugs as «wonder drugs».

Fedor: The journal has been slowly adapting to the changing frontiers in science and the changing composition of the scientific community, but there's still more work to do if we're going to capture emerging areas and draw in the international scientific community.

Historically much of the scientific community has rallied vigorously against any attempt by the humane community to regulate in any way what may be done to animals in the name of research and education, even by grade school children working with little or no training and qualified adult supervision.

There's a lot of anecdotal evidence that this eating strategy works for some people, but according to a number of scientific studies, the frequency of meals has absolutely no effect on fat loss [1, 2], but does have beneficial metabolic effects on dietary thermogenesis and insulin sensitivity [3](in other words, it helps regulate your blood sugar levels, which in turn can help keep your appetite under control).

He doesn't promote anything unless he's seen scientific proof it works or has used it himself.

This is most likely the reason why so many scientific research done on losing weight and maintaining the lost body weight have revealed that you would probably have to work harder to maintain your slim stature than you worked to shed your excess body fat in the first place.