And if there are
scientifically valid arguments on both sides of a controversial topic, we present both sides so that people can make their own decisions.
As a RealClimate blogger, I would never ask you to write your Congressman, but it is very much within our purview to do what we can to assure that journalists use
scientifically valid arguments.
Not exact matches
Even if the
argument is
valid or
scientifically support, such as when human life begins.
They challenge this on rather solid empirical grounds and with physical
arguments and data analysis that is every bit as
scientifically valid as that used to support larger estimates, often obtaining numbers that are in better agreement with observation.
My point is not that everyone who is not a PhD (Climate Science) is an idiot, but that I can't tell whose opinion is or isn't worth consideration in the blogosphere and whose
argument is
scientifically valid or who is just plain bonkers.