How can you call
yourself a scientist behaving that way?
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, a group of 20
scientists studying the Otway Project in Australia since 2008 confirmed Dec. 14 that the CO2 there was
behaving as it was expected to and the practice is indeed an effective
way to keep greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere for thousands and perhaps millions of years.
All of these, including random mutations, are limited by the regular
way in which matter
behaves, indicated by the fact that
scientists have been able from their observations to deduce particular «laws» of physics and chemistry.
In some
ways, genetically normal littermates
behave like mice that carry an autism - related mutation, despite not having the mutation themselves,
scientists report.
Though many
scientists are working with nanotechnology, the
way the tiniest of nanoparticles
behave when they crash into each other is largely an open question, Takato says.
Despite the many obviously irrational
ways we
behave, social
scientists have only just begun to systematically document and understand this central aspect of our nature.
But recently,
scientists have spotted asteroids
behaving and dying in unexpected
ways: Some have tails, some break apart into chunks and others disintegrate into smears of dust, with no obvious second asteroid in sight.
The problem is that
scientists have long seen molecular diodes
behaving in either of the two Marcus regimes in
ways they did not understand.
Chimps don't teach their young to be nice the
way humans do, but in 2007
scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, found that chimps do
behave selflessly, helping their human caretakers reach a stick or unfamiliar chimps open a cage full of food, without expecting a reward.
Some
scientists might explore how and why the neural circuits that detect threats and store fearful memories sometimes
behave in unusual
ways after traumatic events — the kinds of changes that are partially responsible for post-traumatic stress disorder.
And while weather patterns can change from year to year, Lake Superior appears to be
behaving in
ways that, to
scientists, indicate long - term climate change: Water temperatures are rising and evaporation is up, which leads to lower water levels in some seasons.
Scientists think plant cells living in space do not
behave the same
way as cells in plants on Earth, and the experiments will examine these changes on a molecular level.
Hidden camera traps have offered
scientists unprecedented access into the native habitats of endangered species, and they
ways they
behave.
Scientists have found that when test monkeys spent five minutes learning how to use a rake, some of the neurons in their hands began
behaving in a new
way.
However, plasma this hot is extremely turbulent and can
behave in surprising
ways that baffle
scientists, at times becoming unstable, and dissipating before any fusion reactions can take place.
I mean there were for a long time, for many decades,
scientists believe that Neandertals were fundamentally different from modern humans in the
way that they
behaved.
Scientists thought particle accelerators might be repurposed to churn out X-rays in a
way that would
behave like a laser — a light beam made by exciting atoms.
Scientists believe that the ability to
behave in a
way that appears random arises from some of the most highly developed cognitive processes in humans, and may be connected to abilities such as human creativity.
If you haven't heard of it, here's a quick definition from a 2008 paper by Nick Bostrom and Anders Sandberg, two
scientists at the University of Oxford: «The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail and construct a software model of it so faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will
behave in essentially the same
way as the original brain.»
But how will
scientists be really sure that there is a black hole in our Milky
Way and not something else that behaves in a very similar w
Way and not something else that
behaves in a very similar
wayway?
He discovered very painfully that in fact petitions weren't the
way you should
behave anymore, because he sent a copy to James Franck, who had been his colleague and his advisor and with whom he shared many things, and Franck wrote him a very touching but powerful letter saying that, «It's not our right as
scientists just because we're
scientists to intervene in all sorts of policy debate unless it's specific to our own concern.
Scientists have known that Ezh2
behaves in different
ways depending on the specific type of cancer.
As the video from the Feynman lecture points out, real
scientists don't let their intuitions about how things should
behave interfere will discovering and correctly applying theories that accurately explain the
way our world
behaves.»
I can not recognise the attitudes of people like Kevin and Gavin — they do not
behave in the
way I would expect decent responsible
scientists to
behave.
If you really think that
scientists behaving in a
way that others would regard as acceptable would improve things, then you don't understand the goal of science.
Furthermore, his tactics suggest that many other climate
scientists behave the same
way.
I also think the
way Climate
Scientists have
behaved could be very bad for the scientific community at large.
I was simply arguing that even if we judge Gleick or someone else to have
behaved in a
way we disapprove of from the perspective of citizenship in a democracy, that's separate from whether he has compromised his integrity as a
scientist.
Especially when the «
scientists»
behave in
ways that are contrary to any form of science that the sceptics have worked with over thirty forty or fifty years of real practical experience
Also yesterday, Tom Fuller at ClimateScepticism wrote a hard - hitting critique of the Bioscience article that similarly noted the sexist nature of this harassment and the fact that this is the
way Michael Mann and his colleagues
behave toward female
scientists who cross them or their supporters.
But it seems impossible to get
scientists, far less the general public, to accept that not only is the climate system non-linear, it
behaves that
way.
By suggesting that
scientists should somehow
behave in a more trusting
way, implies that you want to trust them as individuals.