Sentences with phrase «scientist in a conflict of interest»

Not exact matches

For example, the scientists involved in the systematic reviews that reported having no conflict of interest may have had preexisting prejudices that affected their interpretation of their findings.

Conflicts of interest are just one of the challenges that academic scientists face in cultivating productive relationships with industry.

Further, in an attempt to make the agency more credible and independent, the law aims to limit the number of scientists with financial conflicts of interest who can serve on FDA advisory panels.

The two representatives refer to a controversy over the use of CT scans to detect lung cancer in which scientists on both sides of a debate about the usefulness of this technology were accused of having conflicts of interest.

Early in the game of creating a company, says Perls, perhaps the most important player with which an academic scientist should communicate is the institutional conflict - of - interest panel, whose job is to assure that financial stakes with a commercial entity don't bias research results or compromise the safety of human subjects.

These might include information about your own availability, related work being reviewed at other journals (from your lab or other labs), or the names of other scientists who are working on the same problem and so would have a conflict of interest in reviewing your paper.

It has become a way of glossing over irresolvable conflict between groups with some interests in common, such as taxpayers (who want to save money), scientists (who want to spend it on exciting projects) and people with disabilities (who hope public funds will improve the quality of their life).

Finally, Roger A. Pielke Jr., a political scientist and specialist in the intersection of climate and disasters at the University of Colorado, Boulder, has been deeply critical of the climate panel for years, contending that it misrepresented work he co-authored and is mired in conflicts of interest.

What conflict of interest can possibly arise if a scientist simply conducts his research and experiments driven by his own curiosity and ability, and then reports his results in a paper submitted to a scientific journal?

The conflict here may be mostly the result of some very wealthy business interests who have a hidden agenda on this issue, and they are known to be spending a lot of money to confuse this issue in any way they can, often by involving a small number of otherwise fine scientists and others to spread doubt on their behalf.

So while climate scientists and gatekeepers in state funding streams are inherently suspect — having this conflict of interest — those in physics are not.

(Dr Pilkey went on to write a global warming book in 2011 in which there is no mistaking his enslavement to Naomi Oreskes» repetition of the «reposition global warming» phrase while apparently being unaware that Oreskes is enslaved to Ross Gelbspan for that phrase as an indictment of skeptic climate scientists» «conflicts of interest guilt.»)

First, a vintage explanation of what was an early effort to tie the medical science aspect of the situation to physical science, from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) Press Release «Scientists Call on Journals to Disclose Authors» Conflicts of Interest», February 4, 2002:

Conflicts of interest are particularly hard in climate because it involves buying in the notion that governmental regulation based on climate scientists» findings will somehow harm fossil fuel companies and the companies are somehow afraid of it.

So, all those scientists serving on Boards of green advocacy groups [Climate Scientists Joining Green Advocacy Groups] who publish in Science on any environmental or climate change topic should be declaring a conflict ofscientists serving on Boards of green advocacy groups [Climate Scientists Joining Green Advocacy Groups] who publish in Science on any environmental or climate change topic should be declaring a conflict ofScientists Joining Green Advocacy Groups] who publish in Science on any environmental or climate change topic should be declaring a conflict of interest.

It is being attended by some of the world's foremost climate scientists, as well as experts in policy formulation and conflict resolution, and some laymen and women with an interest in climate science, including yours truly — me!