Rather, they are the result of a messy, arduous process that pits
scientists against politicians.
Not exact matches
Taking «backfire effect» as a starting point — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given factual evidence
against them — Tillmans has interviewed
scientists,
politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand the political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus on right - wing populism and fake news.
Taking as a starting point the «backfire effect» — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given factual evidence
against them — Tillmans interviewed
scientists,
politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand changes in the international political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus on right - wing populism and fake news.
Scientists should spent their time on science and not on defending themselves
against attacks from
politicians associated to the oil industry.
He suggests that the origin of this objection is most beneficial to a general PR campaign
against climate
scientists, encouraging
politicians and public alike to ignore the advice of climate science.
How can one be guilty of denunciating the ones responsible for knowingly harming people, both directly and indirectly,
against the many advices of individuals, groups, some
politicians and many notorious
scientists and nobel prizes, on all continents through many generations, voluntarily ignoring the signs visible everyday either in the media or directly out their own -LSB-...]
Ultimately, a big increase in government spending on basic energy research will happen only if
scientists can persuade the public and
politicians that it is an essential hedge
against potential calamity.
We also call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by
politicians seeking distractions to avoid taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.
We call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by
politicians seeking distractions to avoid taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.
The Stanford University climate
scientist was a passionate advocate for sober and reasoned discourse on the globe's changing climate, and he often spoke out
against dishonesty in the public sphere — whether by opinion - makers,
politicians, fossil fuel interests, or news personalities.
Further, «We also call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by
politicians seeking distractions to avoid taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.»