Climate science, for example, has been made part of the vision for social justice; whether or not all climate
scientists are happy about it, climate science has been tied to a climate justice movement.
Not exact matches
For
scientists, body / soul dualism
is out — but they
're pretty
happy talking
about consciousness in non-bodily terms, and leaving it to the philosophers to explain its interaction with our brains in the way Descartes had to explain the soul.
I
am not a
scientist or a researcher but I
am passionate
about achieving vibrant health and
am happy to share my experiences and stories with you in the hopes that it will help you forge your own path.
You just go in there and talk
about what you care
about and, in my case, say» I
am a constituent in Arizona and I
am a climate
scientist and I
am happy to
be a resource and or
be helpful to you and connect you to other resources.
«At first, I wasn't
happy about changing comets,» says deputy project
scientist Rita Schulz of ESA in Noordwijk, the Netherlands.
Early - career
scientists in particular
are eager for Sharp to write
about their work on FYFD — which Sharp
is generally
happy to do because it provides a «nice situation» for her to «point people to that research.
But the
scientists here
are so passionate and
are happy to talk to me
about their research.
But skeptical
scientists will
be quick to ask, «Couldn't it simply
be that when people feel good
about themselves, feel
happy, and feel satisfied with their relationships, they'll forgive almost anything?
The program
was peer - reviewed by animal
scientists and canine welfare experts from major academic institutions to corroborate credibility and the most up - to - date scientific knowledge
about dogs, how their brains work and what makes them healthy and
happy.
I
was so
happy recently to read
about all the neurons
scientists are finding in your stomach — you have this second brain in your stomach.
It
's useful to think of this as an example of Bayesian priors in action — given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear
about climate science
are bogus or based on deep confusions
about what modeling
is for, scepticism
is an appropriate first response, but because we
are actually
scientists, not shills, we
are happy to correct real errors — sometimes they will matter, and sometimes they won't.
I
'm happy I found this site, and
am happy bonafide
scientists are addressing errors of the skeptics, who seem to have little concern
about avoiding false negatives (or our biological and economic welfare) and
are excessively fearful of false positives for whatever reasons.
From the article:... You might think this would
be great news for all those
scientists who have
been warning us over the last few years
about the impending horrors of «man - made global warming» but in fact they
are not
happy about it, not one bit.
Anonymous 1:42 (the «Real»
scientist): You talk
about providing evidence, so I
'm sure you will
be happy to provide evidence that the reason NOAA gave for the removal of information
was false and that there
is therefore a «coverup» going on?
After the EF
is revoked, the dam of fakery will break and a herd of
scientists may become
happy to admit long harbored doubts
about the extravagant claims of alarmists.
People who know little
about the science want to lead the discussion to science instead of
being happy to discuss on issues they understand as well as
scientists.
There
are some media outlets that
are happy to publish lower estimates of sensitivity or more
about doubt, and some
scientists who will only talk to those media because they know that
is what they want to hear.
Climate
scientists shouldn't
be too
happy about this.
Not surprisingly,
scientists in the EU
are not very
happy about the outcome.
While
scientists and gamers
are blaming cryptocurrency miners for the dearth of GPUs, Blockchain - based virtual currency miners
are also not
happy about the increasing costs of purchasing these cards.