It's bad enough that your argument essentially consists of wholesale slander of
scientists as liars, but employing a blatant falsehood not even supported by your «sources» is downright dumb and self - defeating.
Not exact matches
Skeptics may still speak somewhere, of course, but if your fellow reports talk of them
as crooked
liars, Tribune readers never become informed from you about the depth of the migraine - inducing levels of science - based detail from skeptic
scientists and skeptic speakers.
The odd thing is, if Professor Ove Hoegh - Guldberg had simply asked at the start to make a statement (like a professional
scientist normally would) Professor Carter (who chaired the meeting) would have gladly done so and I would have given my approval
as well, even though he has called both myself and Dr. Carter «
liars» in advance.
As this despicable lefty elite reminded us, most politicians, academics,
scientists, journalists and bureaucrats (the «elites) are pathological
liars, besides being serial exaggerators.
Monckton sent a characteristically unhinged reply where he labels the climate
scientists as either criminal, serial
liars, mentally disable or having had their emails stolen in Climategate (good to see he still eschews ad hominem attacks).
One other item, another of the commenter Friends at Gelbspan's Facebook post is Desmogblog financier John Lefebvre, the person owning the private jet that Desmogblog co-founder James Hoggan was flying on when he declared —
as I detailed here — that he (Hoggan) knew nothing about climate change but felt compelled to start Desmogblog in order to expose skeptic climate
scientists, which he knew to be
liars as a result of reading Gelbspan's 2004 «Boiling Point» book.
You've just described yourself
as a professional
liar... unlike your projection of your lack of integrity onto climate
scientists, I'm sure your self - identification
as a snake oil salesman is 100 % correct.
If that were to happen, it would become increasingly difficult to accurately label
scientists as «unequivocal»
liars.
2) In spite of the title of this email, I'm well aware —
as are those who read this blog — that global warming alarmists have been exposed
as fearmongering chicken little
liars (not to mention hypocrites) for decades, but rarely has it been on a level where you actually have «
scientists» and their associates caught on paper attempting to suppress data that is contra to their pre-desired result.
Its supplemental online interview of the late IPCC
scientist Dr Stephen Schneider quoted his opinion about the Global Climate Coalition
as being «a coalition of
liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition global warming
as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17 here).
I've already detailed the way Desmog's founder James Hoggan essentially torpedoes his site's entire existence with the way he first admits he knows nothing about climate science, but is certain that skeptic climate
scientists are
liars, the latter of which he derives entirely from Ross Gelbspan, the «Pulitzer - winning investigator» who Al Gore says discovered the supposedly leaked Western Fuels Association «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) PR campaign's sinister strategy to «reposition global warming
as theory rather than fact.»
When I'm branded
as a crook and a
liar by folks who literally can not and will not dispute a solitary detail of what I say about the smear of skeptic climate
scientists, it doesn't harm me, it harms them in a way that's obvious for all to see.