Sentences with phrase «scientists believe in evolution»

Many Christian scientists believe in evolution.

In citing the fact that many religious scientists believe in evolution, I was not saying «gee, they must all be right» because «all those good people seem to agree about....

A scientist believes in evolution because of the overwhelming evidence supporting it and the total lack of evidence for any alternative.

Not exact matches

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

As for numerologists, scientists, and non-believers in general... to explain anything within our universe completely and fully (even the big bang theory or evolution), one must eventually take a leap of faith and believe in something that equations or definitions can't quantify.

I have seen people, previously inclined to believe whatever «science says,» become skeptical when they realize that the scientists actually do seem to think that variations in finch beaks or peppered moths, or the mere existence of fossils, proves all the vast claims of «evolution.»

I wonder how many scientists, especially in the USA, have ceased to believe in God because they believe in evolution, and think that incompatible with faith in God?

Why must kids totally believe in evolution to become taxpayers, scientists, and engineers?

Many scientists believe in a god — they just believe that evolution took place not a six day wonderous creation.

Evolution is not a theory that some scientists believe in.

Yet the enlightened modern man is told by so - called scientists to «believe» in the theory of evolution...

Mega-evolutionists have found that slow, gradual evolution from species to species is mathematically and bio-genetically impossible — yet many «scientists» who've realized this say, «Nevertheless, I believe in mega-evolution.»

I personally know scientists that believe in Jesus Christ and believe that evolution is part of God's design.

Scientists who are christian and understand evolution but think it has many errors believe in evolution..

Scientists who are christian and understand evolution believe in it..

now, you can try and try to show that indeed, no intelligent person does nt believe in evolution as you have defined it, namely necessarily excluding any external entity To which I would simply point to the scores of scientists who believe in ID / Theistic evolution, also including Francis Collins the leader of the Human Genome Project and the author of «The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief»

Actually 97 % of scientists believe in a form of «evolution.»

Many scientists believe in both god AND evolution, like Ken Miller, biology professor, textbook author, and key trial for the teaching of evolution in the Dover trial... who is also a devout and practicing Catholic.

Perhaps most disconcerting to me was the fact that the overwhelming majority of scientists — something like 98 percent — believed in evolution and were working off of evolutionary principles.

Nevertheless, most scientists believe that life — or evolution — can, in principle, be described by the laws of physics.

Harvard's Steven Pinker, the celebrated author of The Blank Slate and an expert on the evolution of language and the mind, addressed that point in an interview in New Scientist magazine: «People, including me, would rather believe that significant human biological evolution stopped between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, before the races diverged, which would ensure that racial and ethnic groups are biologically equivalent.»

«Modified organisms are more complex than we had previously believed,» says Frederic Thomas, a scientist at the Genetics and Evolution of Infectious Diseases research group in Montpellier, France, and the department of biology at the University of Montreal.

He is now organizing a group of experts, including evolutionary scientists and theologians who believe in evolution, to counter the SRT's campaign by working to improve the teaching of evolution in the classroom, and in broader public life.

While some scientists believe there was indeed an explosion of diversity (the so - called punctuated equilibrium theory elaborated by Nils Eldredge the late Stephen J. Gould - Models In Paleobiology, 1972), others believe that such rapid acceleration of evolution is not possible; they posit that there was an extended period of evolutionary progression of all the animal groups, the evidence for which is lost in the all but nonexistent precambrian fossil recorIn Paleobiology, 1972), others believe that such rapid acceleration of evolution is not possible; they posit that there was an extended period of evolutionary progression of all the animal groups, the evidence for which is lost in the all but nonexistent precambrian fossil recorin the all but nonexistent precambrian fossil record.

Scientists believe that the ability to use our brain to differentiate between words and intonation was a huge step in the human evolution and development of speech.

One leading scientist recently argued that a discussion of evolution is necessary because a politician who doesn't believe in evolution won't heed scientists on any other issue either, but this is demonstrably untrue.