Perhaps this failure of honesty and integrity occurred because, as biologist Peter Medawar wrote of Teilhard de Chardin, before climate
scientists deceived the public, they had taken great pains to deceive themselves.
Not exact matches
Although Monsanto has long insisted that their product is harmless to humans, newly released documents related to the lawsuit reveal that the company has long been aware of glyphosate's toxicity — and suppressed research, bribed
scientists and even suborned perjury in an attempt to
deceive the
public.
But the problem is the core message of each sequence is pretty much the same: «climate
scientists have it all wrong and are conspiring to
deceive the
public.»
precise rest mass data of the 3,000 types of atoms that compromise ALL MATTER: Publicly funded
scientists have
deceived the
public for the past seventy years about the source of energy that powers the cosmos and sustains our lives!
Fear of nuclear annihilation drove this alliance of
scientists and world leaders to
deceive the
public in 1945.
Eighteen Democrats in the US House of Representatives directly cited UCS in a letter requesting a formal investigation into Exxon, among others, stating, «UCS uncovered many internal company documents confirming a massive coordinated campaign of deception conducted by the industry to
deceive the
public of climate science that even their own
scientists confirmed.»
Tim Flannery, a
scientist and former director of the Australian government's Climate Commission, accused Lomborg and prime minister Tony Abbott's government of an «ideological attempt at
deceiving the Australian
public.»
Imagine the fallout if he was to become fully informed about Oreskes, Al Gore, Ross Gelbspan, and so many others on that side of the issue who
deceived the
public when they seemingly obscured the collective truth about skeptic climate
scientists.
Jan P Perlwitz: Now, one could ask, is this twisting of Gavin's words, that he was asking for blind faith into science, even though his use of the term «bad faith» implies the opposite, he asks for sticking to the truth and to facts, is based on a lack of knowledge about the English language or is this itself an example for how a statement made by a climate
scientist is twisted in bad faith, for the purpose to deliberately
deceive the
public?
There are lots of interests at stake here, and those in the best position to play games and
deceive the
public are not climate
scientists.
Click on the links within that piece, and you will soon see the entire notion that skeptic climate
scientists are paid industry money to
deceive the
public is anything but a nice, tidy accusation with no loose ends.