Sentences with phrase «scientists doing studies»

«When scientists do the study to examine what tissue you are losing, they find that it's water.»

Ever since my high school biology teacher in East Greenwich, R.I., got our class hooked up with state natural resources scientists doing a study of a salt marsh, I've understood the educational value of getting dirty and wet.

The scientists did the study to put the global temperature trends into a long - range perspective, Marcott said.

Not exact matches

In a new study based on mice, scientists at Lancaster University found that a drug that goes after three diabetes - related targets «significantly reversed the memory deficit» in mice who got the drug, as measured by their performance in a maze test when compared to mice who didn't get the drug.

Rosekind, the scientist who studied the benefits of naps and developed a «fatigue countermeasures» program for NASA, put it in terms business people can understand: «Which person do you want on the job, the one with 34 % better performance [after a nap] and 100 % more alert — or the other guy?»

Not only do scientists need to find a place on Europa's surface that will be worth studying, they also need to find a place to land that won't completely destroy the lander upon touch down, Jim Green, NASA's Director of Planetary Science, told Business Insider.

«We suspected that the young are most vulnerable because of their immature immune systems, but we didn't have a lot of hard evidence to show that before,» said study lead author Bo Hang, a Berkeley Lab staff scientist who previously found that thirdhand smoke could lead to genetic mutations in human cells.

People who marry and don't divorce have about double the net worth of their peers who never wed, according to Jay Zagorsky, an economist and research scientist at Ohio State University, who studied the financial patterns of thousands of adults born from 1957 to 1964.

Scientists do know that the same exercises won't always have the same allergic result, according to a study published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports.

When researchers out of Russia examined the sleep and wakefulness rhythms of 130 study subjects (by keeping the obliging participants up for a full 24 hours and quizzing them periodically about how they were feeling), the scientists found that some folks really didn't prefer early or late hours.

The scientists advising the French government did not all agree with the conclusions the report drew from the new studies.

The B.C. government announced a halt to increased shipments of diluted bitumen until scientists can finally study what this toxic blend of heavy crude does when it spills.

Scientists study science, do you get angry at mechanics for knowing more than you about your car?

Are you aware that in every study and poll for the past 90 years — the first one done in 1916, the most recent in 2006 — the number of scientists who believe in God (i.e., specifically a God that one can «interact» with) has not budged?

For example, some scientists do attempt to throw light on human behavior through the study of other creatures.

Survey social scientists with expertise in surveys and the study of religion to learn if they do or do not have confidence in polls about religion.

Unfortunately, there are examples of at least one study, which claims 97 percent of climate scientists agree global warming is happening and is manmade, which may have done a not - so - great job of reaching such a conclusion.

To the Christian, such an atheistic approach to human nature is essentially inhuman, since men do not exist without a fundamental religious vocation any more than they exist in this life without physical needs, individuality or communities, all aspects of the human condition eagerly studied by social scientists.

(I didn't consider myself a scientist so I went and looked up the word, indeed I was a scientist because I studied all I could about the work I was doing.

But we shouldn't take as our paradigm of knowing the most technical and rigorous kinds of focusing — like what scientists do when they're studying a virus.

In fact, scientists have copied nature to produce machines, there is a field of study its called biomimicry, and its a science, who did it first?

4) You're right — me rejecting it doesn't mean a thing because I haven't studied it to the extreme as the world renowned scientists who have.

Research studies have shown that many scientists are now trending towards believing in at least some form of divinity however; I think it's largely that we're only now letting science get the oppression it experienced over some of the religious wars fought over political reasons with little to do with actual beliefs or study.

Like the testimony of an elite scientist, Lord William Kelvin, who says «I believe that the more thoroughly science is studied, the further does it take us from anything comparable to atheism.»

That, at least, is what the author of the article and, though not so assertively, the scientists who produced the study, have done.

I don't think any scientist in his right mind would try to get a grant for such a study.

As for the flood and plagues in the old testament, there have been studies done by credible scientists that have shown some possible reasons for such things.

The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it... because it is beautiful.

The difficulties do not preclude finding great satisfaction in this work; 87 per cent of 4,000 scientists surveyed answered «Yes» to the question «If you had it to do over again, would you choose the same line of study?»

They have articles and studies done by scientists that back up the creationist story.

How can I know why a study was rejected if I don't even know what study or scientists or experiments you're talking about?

No scientist has proven all of the principles that he uses to study, as well as all of the related principles required in order to prove the first, and no engineer has done the same with all of the equations she uses to design.

PE does NOT decimate darwinian gradualism, as you would know if you studied the science of PE and the various arguments by scientists that deal with it..

Because Scientists can not study that which they can not see... they don't have all the facts, do they?

If one omits the happy ending of Stage 7 (which Joan Jackson could include because her study was done in an AA wife's group), and translates the language of the social scientist into the parlance of everyday living, one has a picture of the starkest interpersonal tragedy.

Abraham Ayrookuzhiel did study the dalit religiosity but had remained a social scientist and never attempted to allow Christian «god - talk» to dialogue with dalit cultural resources.5 V. Devasahayam in his «Outside the Camp» has made a deliberate attempt to utilize the cultural resources of dalits in interpreting the Biblical texts.6

I'll take the studies done by scientists that all come to the same basic conclusion over your god any day.

My scientist dad has taught me that you can't always trust studies, as some are done improperly or stretch the findings to match the theory.

Sayers adds, «Scientists also did a study of Native American plains Indians and found that while some died of tuberculosis and other infectious diseases, they never found any evidence of cancer or heart or stroke problems.

Secret to terroir may lie in bacteria, say scientists: Researchers in the U.S. have published a study suggesting that the characteristics associated with terroir could have more to do with microbes found around the root system of a vine, than the soil that it grows in...

Once the study came to an end, the scientists discovered that baobab powder DOES have an analgesic effect when given in the recommended dose.

They even fund research scientists at prestigious universities to conduct studies and write policy papers that are skewed toward saying that their products don't contribute to diabetes, heart disease, obesity etc..

The scientists studied the medical records for a random sample of more than 500 families, comparing those who got nurse visits to those who didn't.

Despite finding that underreporting continues to be what she wrote in two 2013 studies to be an «alarming» and «overwhelming» problem, Dr. Johna Register - Mihalik, a research scientist and member of the faculty at the Matthew Gfeller Sport - Related TBI Research Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, recently told MomsTEAM that the reason she and her colleagues did not recommend the use of impact sensors in addressing the problem was that she viewed «the use of impact sensors in concussion detection, as the science, although a growing field of information, [as] just not quite there in [terms of] how the [y] may best be used from a clinical standpoint and across all sport settings.»

If you don't trust the FDA take comfort in the knowledge that many of those studies were undertaken by scientists with no affiliation to any government with funding from non-governmental sources.

What we know from scientists studying bullying, is if your child watching from the outside says to the bully, «Hey, I don't like that.

As a scientist myself, I want to pass on a very important piece of information to everyone — do not believe what you read in the summaries or headlines of scientific studies!

One thing that jumps to mind is a series of studies done by scientists in Switzerland, who compared the brain scans of parents to those of childless people.

More work has to be done on humans as many of the results showed up in mice samples, however in studying the human brains of women who had AD scientists found significantly less male fetal tissue in their brains as in the same of women who did not have AD.

I happen to know that doctors are not scientists, and in general most do not employ the scientific method in their so - callled «studies.»