Sentences with phrase «scientists feel they understand»

There is a hierarchy of weather events which scientists feel they understand well enough for establishing climate change links.

Not exact matches

«Your presentation was incredible — a great combination of information and humor — and I truly feel as if I have a better understanding of who Warren Buffett is as a person, a businessman, a scientist, a genius, and a humanitarian.

Scientists use hunches, gut feel, etc. to direct research into the frontier of understanding along with reason.

And worse, how few understand enough science not to feel an immediate defensiveness, wariness and hostility whenever the work of scientists reaches the front pages of the newspapers?

As an agnostic scientist I feel more spiritual, a better understanding of life, nature and even death.

It was a great afternoon, and I was left feeling grateful that although we have come far in our understanding of the processes behind it all, our love of the magic of nature still inspires artists and scientists alike.

When we review and edit letters of recommendation, our goal is for each letter to «spoon - feed» the most interesting information about the research to INS; to explain the relevance of the research so that the adjudicator understands that he or she will personally benefit from this research; and to leave the adjudicator with a feeling of excitement that he or she is aiding science by bringing an excellent scientist permanently to the United States.

Dale feels strongly that science communicators should be scientists who understand the science behind the issues and can get past the emotions.

Many social animals start to feel itchy after watching one of their fellows scratch, and scientists now have a better understanding of why an itch can spread through a group.

On the largest of scales, scientists feel they are closer than ever before to understanding how the universe began and how it will end (page 36).

«I was let go from the hospital and I felt better,» he says, «but the whole thing bothered me, and being a scientist by nature I tried to understand what I had.»

It is important that engineers and scientists who begin their careers with excitement, filled with bright hope and aspirations of making significant contributions to their technical community and the organization for which they work, do not feel frustrated by organizational structure, operations, or interactions that they do not understand.

«Here's the thing,» says UVM scientist Ingi Agnarsson, «we need to understand and protect biodiversity in its many forms, and we felt compelled to recognize leaders that understand this.»

«The half - degree estimate was the offshoot of a series of papers over a decade by the scientists, research that proved pivotal in the evolving understanding of the ties [Kigali agreement], of course it feels great that people are using your work,» he says.

Many scientists and clinicians working with cancer have the feeling that if there was a much greater fundamental understanding of neoplasia at the cellular, molecular, and genetic levels, then improved therapies and better preventive measures could and would be developed.

I hope the industry executives and paid scientists who contributed to this epidemic for their own financial gain can somehow and someday understand the enormity of their actions and feel the weight of what they have done on their shoulders.

I think that I can actually understand this argument; however, I think most vets and other scientists feel that it is a bad argument for the simple reason that dogs are no longer really wild animals.

The run - up in climate science funding is rather modest compared to other areas of science funding, and a more reasonable interpretation of the funding picture isn't that climate scientists are trying to act alarmed in order to run up their funding, but rather that they (we) are trying to run up funding because they actually are alarmed and feel that the subject needs to be understood better.

«I can understand how a scientist without tenure can feel the community pressures,» says environmental scientist Roger Pielke Jr., a colleague of Vranes» at the University of Colorado.

I get the feeling that if more people were exposed to that type of journalism they would begin to understand the scientists and science are not infallible.

Among the general public, it's the people who don't feel confident about their understanding of the issue, who are in the most agreement with the scientists about it.

Whereas belief in the human causation of global warming is overwhelmingly high among the scientists who specialize in the subject, belief in it decreases among the U.S. public to the extent that a member of the public feels confident that he or she understands it.

His caveat at the end is ironic given that what he is struggling with regarding this so called «double ethical bind» is the compunction a scientists feels to take political action based upon their understanding of the science.

While I understand why the scientists here feel justly upset about the tone of the editorial, IMO it is the only tone that could change the opinion of WSJ readers.

Identified by renowned scientists, including a number of research psychologists, there are certain physiological signs that can help us to understand what we are feeling.