Sentences with phrase «scientists have an eye on»

Cryopreserving organs could one day revolutionize transplantation, but some scientists have their eyes on an even larger prize: freezing entire human bodies.

Not exact matches

All of the blind people in the world would love to hear your analysis on this scientist that can make eyes, and are they the ones that one can actually use to see with, or the ones to appear as though you have eyes?

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

But David Asante says the Alliance has testimony of an eye witness who is also a scientist claiming the police used nitrous oxide or sleeping gas on the protesters.

But with three sets of eyes on the eruption, each of them spaced nearly evenly around the Sun, the scientists could use their models to recreate a 3 - D view.

The report had recommended that NSF lean on Antarctic scientists to keep a sharper eye on the costs of instrumentation deployment and operation support by considering those costs in the review and selection of science projects.

A few scientists think a near - Earth asteroid on a bull's - eye path might even have reshaped human history (see «Did a Comet Cause the Great Flood?»).

Based on everything that scientists knew about mammalian eyes, nothing should have happened.

Scientists working for CBI's parent company, Skai Ventures, originally had their eye on an entirely different product when they discovered the sticky gel.

Earlier research by other scientists has shown that the drug verteporfin, used to treat abnormal blood vessel formation in the eye, acts on the YAP pathway inhibiting the protein's YAP function.

Scientists have been keeping a wary eye on Greenland's ice sheet, which holds in its frozen waters the equivalent of 7.4 meters of sea level rise.

If there are more than four dimensions, however, most people can't quite visualize what's going on — scientists have yet to invent n - D glasses for the mind's eye.

Platt's work on HIV / AIDS has taken him to South Africa and Ethiopia and opened his eyes to the need for doctors and scientists to become activists at times.

«The idea was to have a system that would read steps to them under their control, so they could keep their hands and eyes on whatever task they were doing,» says Beth Ann Hockey, a computer scientist who leads the project at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, US.

The work also has implications for whether scientists who study eye contact should focus on social brain regions rather than those involved in fear and anxiety.

Scientists may begin their studies with an eye on a tenure - track position, but these coveted jobs have been vanishing under a glut of science degrees and university budget cuts.

By programming instructions into their genes, scientists have engineered E. coli that act like computers, assembling into glowing bull's - eye shapes on command.

If you've signed the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (http://am.ascb.org/dora/), or you just don't think a metric designed for a journal should be used to evaluate individual scientists, avert your eyes: Journal impact factor has a strong influence on a scientist's probability of attaining PI - ship.

The scientist has bore witness to the final moments of more than 100 stars, although these fiery orbs have, in actuality, been dead for eons by the time Still lays eyes on them.

Working in a Stanford - funded lab on the island country, the scientists report that they already have identified more than 20 individual lemurs with unique genetic traits, including obesity, high cholesterol, high blood sugar, cardiac arrhythmias, progressive eye disease and motor and personality disorders.

Despite years of searching, however, scientists have not found a mutation for blue eyes on the gene.

Coral reefs may look static to the naked eye, but scientists have now seen «violent» activity on their surface.

They are so inaccessible that even scientists who study them may not have laid eyes on them.

At least some scientists have concluded that the head - bobbing seen in pigeons and many other bird species with eyes on opposite sides of the head also serves to provide parallax data from two different positions.

The FDA's announcement several months ago that it would hold a public hearing on the subject elicited an outcry from scientists, ethicists and religious groups, who say the technology raises grave safety concerns and could open the door to creating «designer» babies, whose eye color, intelligence and other characteristics are selected by parents.

Hot on the heels of last weeks report of the successful use of gene therapy to treat the eye disease Leber's congenital amaurosis comes a report that scientists lead by Nathalie Cartier and Patrick Aubourg of the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research have combined gene therapy and stem cell medicine to successfully... Continue reading Gene therapy on the brain

Since its launch, Hubble has reshaped our view of space, with scientists writing thousands of papers based on the telescope's clear - eyed findings on important stuff like the age of the universe, gigantic black holes or what stars look like in the throes of death.

Scientists said they'd be keeping a close eye on the solar region where the flare erupted to monitor for any future bursts.

More eyes on the data could be a good thing for the search as a whole, but I think that NASA still has to be concerned for the careers of the scientists, and presumably students, working with these proprietary data.

Even now, when the world was filling up with surprisingly young scientists and army officers and plant managers — the older ones having taken to disappearing by night, leaving silence behind them, and gaps in every hierarchy to be plugged by anxious twentysomethings working all hours to learn their new jobs — even now, pinched and tired as he was, dull - skinned like everyone else on the tram, he still had the occasional difficulty with someone misled by his big adam's apple, and his big eyes, and his sticking - out ears.

Rogers has a scientist's curiosity and a poet's eye and consequently writes of the cosmos — from the subatomic world to the stars, from a bird perching on a branch to the workings of the human brain — with passionate specificity, philosophical insight, and elegantly expressed exaltation.

To overcome this difficulty, governments and the broader society have established assessment mechanisms in which the full range of scientists, volunteering in the public eye for the public good, provide up - to - date information on what is solid, what speculative, and what silly.

Eric Berger of the Houston Chronicle has weighed in with an excellent post on the letter, noting that none of the complainants are climate scientists; that NASA's position as an agency reflects the brunt of science pointing to a human - heated planet; and that the personal stances of high - profile NASA scientists, Hansen, for instance, are indeed likely to damage the agency's credibility in the eyes of a public divided on global warming.

Now, Canadian scientists are seeking additional funding for more and better «eyes» with which to observe our sun, which has a bigger impact on Earth's climate than all the tailpipes and smokestacks on our planet combined.

It is a very eye opening read but for many here it will just reinforce that what is already known and that is any weakness in the scientific arguments on ACC / AGW is exploited as needing more research (scientists have to acknowledge this I suppose as its in their nature) and hence action and legislation is delayed.

yeah, if only «they» were a monolith, they might have official bodies capable of issuing position statements on behalf of their scientist members, they might have some sort of (I don't know) Royal Society even... they might, in short, be capable of at least a rudimentary form of self - policing, perhaps even enough to render themselves culpable en masse for the abuses they collectively turned a blind eye to, despite having the collective ability to stop them.

Because they're skeptics, scientists know to tread carefully when they come across stories that begin with the words «According to a new study...» But, a new study published last week about the impact of global warming on precipitation patterns in the lower and middle latitudes has caught the eye of John Walsh and other researchers.

From 5 months out, the forecast for such a high number was being scoffed at, but if someone told you, as a scientist, there was going to 16 - 18 storms and 5 majors arguably 6 (Alex was 947 mb with a 12 mile wide eye) what would have been your impact conclusion on the US coastline.

In other words, when it comes to the practice of science, the scientists must never have an eye on the audience.

That said, when — if — the reports start filtering in, expect the angle on the stories not to be about the damaging information in the emails — information that, to my layman's eyes, appears to show «scientists» trying to hide data that would hinder their pro-alarmist agenda, but instead about how it was an «invasion of privacy» with quotes from «scientists» and those in related fields expressing «outrage» that the hard work of their colleagues has been «compromised.»

We are so quick as scientists, non experts, the lay public, some ill informed undergrads, ad infinitum, to argue in this blog, however, you as a first hand expert modeling paleoclimate and modern climate trends and obviously with a handle on chemistry and physics, also have a vested interest in our planet and though you do the modeling for a living, I do not doubt it has helped you gain inisghts and opened up your eyes to the complexity and current to future detriments and potentialities we all face as humanity.

Brought a tear to my eye, Al, that you're so moved that a scientist would have their motives impugned on the basis of their source of funding.