Sentences with phrase «scientists in a relevant field»

You have been told repeatedly thay 99.95 % of all scientists in the relevant fields state evolution is a fact.

A guy who has published nothing since 24 years ago, and has never published anything related to climate science and never worked as a scientists in a relevant field.

Not exact matches

99.95 % of ALL relevant scientists in the fields related to evolution agree that the Theory of Evolution describes the diversification of life on earth.

But it also means that people like Voytek have to deal with a flood of relevant information coming in from all of those scientific fields and figure out how to get scientists from those disciplines to work together.

According to the scientists, this property in particular makes the discovery relevant for potential applications, because such conductive channels cause low conduction loss on the one hand and can be used directly to transmit and process information in the field of spintronics on the other.

Another # 300 million will be spent on fellowships for early - and midcareer scientists, grants to attract foreign scientists, and support for an additional 1000 Ph.D. students in fields relevant to the industrial strategy.

One older Canadian scientist, well - known in the field for his decades of patient measurements, still felt the science of permafrost would not be relevant until later this century.

Practically by definition, for a scientist in his or her field the relevant abstract models have become quasi-concrete, because working with them has become intuitive to a considerable degree; the models are manipulable at will, and implications and interactions involving them will be relatively self - evident, or at least discoverable.

I would be energetically seeking out opinion pieces, articles, and letters from leaders in the various fields, i.e., relevant scientists, relevant moral philosophers, relevant economists, relevant psychologists, and so forth.

To be sure a «debate» over whether or not human activity is altering the climate still rages, but it is not a clear - headed objective debate about the science among scientists actually working in the relevant fields, it's a debate about the science and its impact on human society in the court of public opinion.

I'd love to see these thousands of scientists (at least ones with background in fields like geology or climatology that are relevant) who disagree with the consensus that has been illustrated by the likes of the National Academies and IPCC.

We take our cue from Lindzen because no scientist with expertise in the relevant field makes this point quite so eloquently or persuasively.»

Said study invariably being a paper written by Real Scientists, on data collected by themselves, and published in a Real Scientific Journal, specializing in the relevant field.

Yet who despite lack of relevant expertise, do not welcome the appraisal of experts — and on this topic the experts are those scientists in directly related fields who professionally study this issue — but often, at least with the more general anti climate change efforts that have massively skewed the «discussion,» in fact often expend a great deal of effort to find any possible fault, real or imagined with anything they assert, then erroneously turn that into a refutation of the broader issue, along with, often, denigrating climate science efforts, and often climate scientists.

Some argue that the views of an untutored blogger, or even a scientist from another discipline, should never carry the same weight as those of someone with a lifetime's expertise in a relevant field.

Relevant scientists that work in the field now have 99 % confidence in the relevant data and its impliRelevant scientists that work in the field now have 99 % confidence in the relevant data and its implirelevant data and its implications.

The routine assumption that the analyses put forward of innumerate bloggers are just as valid as (in fact more valid than) as those of scientists who have devoted their life to the relevant field is one aspect of this, as is the constant demand to «teach the controversy» on evolution, climate science, wind turbine health scares, vaccination and so on.