Scientists know for certain that these differences exist, but we are not yet sure why.
When one of its samples released carbon dioxide after being heated to a high temperature,
scientists knew for certain that the sample contained calcium carbonate.
Not exact matches
Atheists: I
know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking
for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he
knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the
Scientist of
Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
June 4, 2013 —
Scientists may not know for certain whether life exists in outer space, but new research from a team of scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on m
Scientists may not
know for certain whether life exists in outer space, but new research from a team of
scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on m
scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on meteorites.
Life - Producing Phosphorus Carried to Earth by Meteorites June 4, 2013 —
Scientists may not know for certain whether life exists in outer space, but new research from a team of scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on m
Scientists may not
know for certain whether life exists in outer space, but new research from a team of
scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on m
scientists led by a University of South Florida astrobiologist now shows that one key element that produced life on Earth was carried here on meteorites.
«That is really the greatest challenge, because many
scientists can come up with new materials
for certain applications,... but if they don't
know how these materials are going to be placed in the body and interact with the cells, interact with biological fluids and so on, they have no appreciation of the total problem,» Peppas says.
«There is a
certain ironic satisfaction in seeing a study funded by the Koch Brothers — the greatest funders of climate change denial and disinformation on the planet — demonstrate what
scientists have
known with some degree of confidence
for nearly two decades: that the globe is indeed warming, and that this warming can only be explained by human - caused increases in greenhouse gas concentrations,» he wrote.
In an article published in the journal Physical Review E
scientists at the Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences (INP PAS) in Krakow, Poland, have shown
for the first time that
certain overlooked features of the graphs of multifractals,
known as singularity spectra of the time series, have in fact a close relationship with the nature of the analyzed phenomena.
While
scientists have long
known that
certain species use UVA light
for communication, this was the first study to demonstrate that some are also able to detect shorter - wavelength UVB light.
«There may be a non-zero safe ash level
for commercial jets, of so many particles of a
certain size per minute,» he told New
Scientist, «but we just don't
know.»
No one
knows for certain how PBDEs get into the human body, but
scientists suspect it may result from ingesting foam or plastic dust particles or from eating contaminated fish.
That property makes it a powerful weapon
for combating
certain cancers, but
scientists don't
know how it works.
Scientists have
known for a long time that as people grow older, their brain recruits alternate neural regions to help when
certain areas naturally decline.
Remarkably, we do
know for certain where the crossover happened because
scientists can track it.
For years,
scientists have wondered if
certain surface features are the result of plate tectonics, which, if true, would make Europa the only
known place in the Solar System other than Earth to experience large, subduction - driven quakes.
Scientists need to explain to the public that while they continue to study the details of anthropogentic global warming and consequent climate change, that we already
know enough to be
certain that continued unmitigated warming will be a disaster
for all humanity, and that we urgently need to phase out all fossil fuel use as quickly as possible.
Scientists knew that cells broke down their own proteins under
certain conditions: to dispose of defective proteins and to use them
for food when starved.
While we understand that anti-depressant medications such as selective serotonin and selective serotonin and norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs and SNRIs) work better than placebo (in about 40 - 60 % of cases),
scientists don't
know for certain why they have an affect.
While
scientists have
known for decades that tropical reservoirs are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, new research from Washington State University - Vancouver has revealed that temperate reservoirs can produce a significant surge in emissions during
certain times in their operation.
As has been discussed at this site previously,
no matter how much people (or
certain climate
scientists) fear additional atmospheric CO2, humans are not going to lower their total emissions
for several decades.
Though 1500
scientists refused to deny the climate engineering issue on the record, you somehow
know for certain that no climate engineering whatsoever is taking place?
Even worse, it is actually misleading to say the world is heading
for 3.5 °C of warming, or 3.0 °C or 4.0 °C, because to do so gives the impression that we can set the global thermostat at a
certain temperature, whereas beyond a
certain amount of warming (maybe 2.0 °C although
scientists do not really
know) feedback mechanisms will be set in train that will amplify human - induced warming and take the Earth to a warmer, perhaps much warmer, state.
Scientists need to explain to the public that while they continue to study the details of anthropogentic global warming and consequent climate change, that we already
know enough to be
certain that continued unmitigated warming will be a disaster
for all humanity, and that we urgently need to phase out all fossil fuel use as quickly as possible.
I've already detailed the way Desmog's founder James Hoggan essentially torpedoes his site's entire existence with the way he first admits he
knows nothing about climate science, but is
certain that skeptic climate
scientists are liars, the latter of which he derives entirely from Ross Gelbspan, the «Pulitzer - winning investigator» who Al Gore says discovered the supposedly leaked Western Fuels Association «Information Council
for the Environment» (ICE) PR campaign's sinister strategy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»
When even genuine climate
scientists can not get a short article published, that tries make other climate
scientists aware of data that might have a slightly negative effect on AGW theory (as in the CO2 warming might not be as bad as predicted by climate models), well, you
know for certain that climate science is
no - longer functioning as a science.
At Least Three Individual Whales Found, Maybe More The
scientists don't
know for certain how many individual right whales they recorded, but say that because at times they recorded right whales on the same day from widely spaced sites, the absolute minimum it is three.
What I learned about ocean methane was reasonably reassuring, with the caveat that
scientists would like to
know a great deal more about these deposits before declaring
for certain that the hazard is minimal.