Not exact matches
CLAIMS that a common human parasite could have begun to outwit its
main drug enemy have triggered a heated
argument between
scientists.
My
main reason for these discussions is to present my
arguments before a group of
scientists who know what they are talking about, to see if they can shoot holes in them, And for that I have been extremely successful.
And we also learned that (what the NYT calls) «
main - stream
scientists» are becoming desperate as they run out of
arguments to support AGW.
I often tell my friends that when you really flay away all the bullshit, the
main argument by climate catastrophists for anthropogenic origens of climate change is that
scientists «can't think of anything else it can be.»