The reason climate
scientists measure the temperatures in all three regions is that the continent has varied climates.
Not exact matches
The
scientists incubated soil from a peatland and a forest in Minnesota at different
temperatures and
measured the efficiency with which microbes grew.
To
measure the van der Waals forces,
scientists in Basel used a low -
temperature atomic force microscope with a single xenon atom on the tip.
Here, the
scientists used the new HERMES instrument to
measure the
temperature of semiconducting hexagonal boron nitride by directly observing the atomic vibrations that correspond to heat in the material.
A team of
scientists using an innovative fiber - optic cable — based technology has
measured temperature changes within and below the ice over 14 months.
By
measuring the effect for different material thicknesses in the range of a few nanometers up to several micrometers as well as for different
temperatures, the
scientists have found characteristic behavior.
By
measuring the remaining difference — the 20,000 - year old ice deep in the West Antarctic ice sheet is about 1 degree Celsius cooler than the surface — the
scientists were able to estimate the original
temperature based on how fast pure ice warms up.
Now a group of American and British
scientists have used a new chemical technique to
measure the change in terrestrial
temperature associated with this shift in global atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
Climate
scientist Gilbert Compo's response to that was: Well, I'll
measure those
temperatures differently.
Scientists know that there are various forms of energy, including sensible heat (which we
measure as
temperature), radiant energy (like what we feel from the sun), and latent heat.
Now, using the Doppler effect to add a third dimension to their data, the
scientists have been able to
measure the speed of the moving plasma, as well as its direction,
temperature and density.
The «smart» Solar Glasses designed as a case study by the
scientist and his team at KIT, is self - powered to
measure and display the solar illumination intensity and ambient
temperature.
Scientists have since graduated to vastly improved technologies for
measuring the ocean's
temperatures.
To demonstrate the feasibility of the conductors, the
scientists fabricated fully printed stretchable pressure and
temperature sensors — that can sense weak force and
measure heat close to body and room
temperatures — wired with the printable elastic conductors on textiles.
To explore the links between climatic warming and rainfall in drylands,
scientists from the Universities of Cardiff and Bristol analysed more than 50 years of detailed rainfall data (
measured every minute) from a semi-arid drainage basin in south east Arizona exhibiting an upward trend in
temperatures during that period.
«Whereas WMAP has
measured roughly 10 percent of the information that we can obtain from the CMB
temperature fluctuations, Planck should
measure essentially all of it,» says project
scientist Charles Lawrence of JPL, Goldsmith's counterpart on the Planck mission.
Scientists often
measure the effects of
temperature on insects to predict how climate change will affect their distribution and abundance, but a Dartmouth study shows for the first time that insects» fear of their predators, in addition to
temperature, ultimately limits how fast they grow.
Gestwicki's team decided to use a technology called differential scanning fluorimetry, which allows
scientists to
measure the
temperature at which a target protein begins to melt.
Scientists measured how much carbon dioxide the artificially warmed plants respired — released into the air via their leaves — and learned that over time, the trees acclimated to warmer
temperatures and increased their carbon emissions less than expected.
Scientists can
measure temperature, pressure and gas motions when they study the signature of molecules in the signals they detect.
Until the giant galactic void was further studied by the University of Minnesota researchers, it was known as the «WMAP Cold Spot» because NASA
scientists measured colder
temperatures in the region than in surrounding areas.
Scientists only know El Niño and La Niña years are on their way by
measuring sea surface
temperatures and other weather hints.
This understanding is likely to grow dramatically: since 2000 or so,
scientists have deployed some 3,500 autonomous Argo floats, which
measure ocean
temperature and salinity automatically and continuously — a much more reliable set of records than you can get from ships.
There's no satellite in space that's capable of directly
measuring ocean acidity, but an international team of
scientists writing in the journal Environmental Science & Technology described last week how satellite measurements of sea surface
temperatures, salinity and plankton activity could be combined and used to estimate pH.
In 1749, Scottish
scientist Alexander Wilson used several kites, attached in a row, to
measure and compare air
temperature at different altitudes.
Before today's basic refrigerator could ever be born though,
scientists had to tease apart the meaning of
temperature, find a standard way to
measure it, discover what it takes for water to freeze, and how ice melts.
Because variations in the ground surface
temperature over time affect the distribution of
temperature in the subsurface,
scientists can carefully
measure the
temperature at depth within these holes and then use mathematical formulas to infer past
temperatures at the surface.
Scientists at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) gather data from a global network of some 800 climate - monitoring stations to
measure changes in the earth's average
temperature.
The NOAA letter states: ``... we have: provided the Committee with the data it has requested, to the extent such data exist; provided citations to peer - reviewed articles that explain the methodology that NOAA
scientist use to analyze the data; and explained how the
temperature is
measured by various means and how such data must be corrected for non-climatic factors.
Scientists rely on automatic stream gauges to
measure the
temperature of rivers.
While enough small
measures could help reduce emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 (the goal of the climate bill that died early in his first term), climate
scientists caution that won't be enough to avert the worst impacts of global
temperature rise.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's
temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
Although ocean
temperatures are more difficult to
measure than land
temperatures,
scientists can use several methods to create an extensive ocean record.
For decades,
scientists studying climate change have
measured the oxygen isotope ratio in tree - ring cellulose to determine the ambient
temperature and relative humidity of past climates.
The international agreements forming the IPCC and the UNFCCC were designed to prevent greenhouse gas warming of the atmosphere, and as those agreements were hammered out, two American
scientists, Roy Spencer and John Christy, developed a method that uses data collected from weather satellites to produce science's first comprehensive
measure of global atmospheric
temperatures.
As the Spencer - Christy method to
measure atmospheric
temperatures was being developed — a method that would permit
scientists to test the greenhouse gas warming hypothesis in the Charney Report — international organizations did not wait to act.
To conduct the research, a team of
scientists led by John Fasullo of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, combined data from three sources: NASA's GRACE satellites, which make detailed measurements of Earth's gravitational field, enabling
scientists to monitor changes in the mass of continents; the Argo global array of 3,000 free - drifting floats, which
measure the
temperature and salinity of the upper layers of the oceans; and satellite - based altimeters that are continuously calibrated against a network of tide gauges.
We take a look at how
scientists measure global
temperature.
Because we didn't have a systematic global set of thermometer measurements before the 1880s,
scientists look at other things they can
measure — sediment deposits, or tree ring growth in certain ancient, slow - growing trees — which tend to vary along with
temperature.
That winter was also to be the coldest in the UK since 1978/79, when climate
scientists were still scaring us with stories about imminent global cooling and satellites were only just starting to
measure the
temperature of the lower troposphere and the beginnings of the «catastrophic» decline in Arctic sea - ice.
If empirical evidence, based on raw data, tested and verified by skeptical
scientists, using the same code, algorithms and methods used by Michael Mann, Phil Jones, the IPCC or anyone else showed a cause and effect relationship between rising anthropogenic CO2 emissions followed by rising global
temperatures, the amount of which could be quantified and
measured, I would have to accept that catastrophic AGW was the likely cause.
Scientists typically
measure the
temperature of permafrost near the top of the «active layer,» which freezes and thaws seasonally.
In a rather bizarre manner that non-biased
scientists would not employ, this study massively adjusted up the ocean buoy
temperature measurements in order to match the ship records of engine water intake
temperature; yet the buoys were designed to
measure surrounding sea
temperatures, and the engine intakes were not.
When
scientists measure global warming, they examine how much
temperatures have changed over time.
I have my doubts that
scientists can
measure global average
temperature to within tenths of a degree at any given time.
Ocean
temperatures have risen only 0.1 degree Celsius over the last five decades, according to a landmark study some
scientists argue could change the way researchers
measure the ocean's
temperature levels.
Unlike other
scientists in the global warming field who have had to continually backtrack, sidestep and spin erroneous findings when their models proved embarrassingly wrong, Abdussamatov's studies over the last decade have stayed on course, in keeping with the actual
temperature readings that ultimately provide a true
measure of climate change.
To learn more about how
scientists measure surface
temperatures from space and the ground, read the new Earth Observatory feature, Where is the Hottest Place on Earth?.
NoTricksZone reader Indomitable Snowman, a
scientist who wishes to remain anonymous, has submitted an analysis of June
temperature in Germany
measured by the DWD German Weather Service.
As just one example; «How we can know an average global sea surface
temperature back to 1850 when so much of the world was unexplored let alone its oceans
measured» should be just one example that should make
scientists question whether the models they build are actually using reliable data, or whether they think they already know the answer and therefore just use data that supports it, no matter its doubtful provenance.