«There is no reason for such an appointment when there are
scientists of every political stripe who adhere to the scientific method, have the humility to accept when they are wrong and would be willing to serve their country if asked by an incoming president.»
Not exact matches
For example, if you agree that people
of all ideological and cultural and
political stripes are vulnerable to identity - oriented «motivated - reasoning,» then what do you think about articles that finger point about about the biases among «liberal»
scientists even as the
political orientation
of the author is dismissed as a potentially relevant factor?
The fact that today's «science»
of AGW is quite murky and has a disgusting odor therefore suggests that
scientists of all
stripes are not policing their turf well at all, and are themselves therefore very complicit in the «
political» shenanigans that have been going on for the past 30 years.